The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose the end goal drops family, which we want. Since there is no evidence of a need to disambiguate these from other noted families with these last names, I see no reason to chance the names.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:35, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Which are not the families involved here. Just because some families need to be disambiguated does not mean such is needed for all families. We only disambiguate where it is needed.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:40, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No, those categories you mention are not in this nomination, so they are not involved in this nomination. I see no evidence we need to disambiguate these specific familes. The fact that some entries in a category need to be disambiguated does not mean we have to disambiguate all of them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:14, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Knights of Rhodes archaeological sites in Greece
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Reverse merge "Presidencies of X". Essentially as diffusion to the subcat. - jc3721:48, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Completely redundant. What's the inherent difference between the presidencies of Theodore Roosevelt and James K. Polk? Nevertheless, Presidency of Theodore Roosevelt is in Presidencies of the United States, while Category:Presidency of James K. Polk is in United States presidential administrations. Presidencies is currently the parent for administrations, so normally I'd propose upmerging administrations into presidencies, but the "administrations" name is better ("presidencies", plural, is something more appropriate for things like the Bombay Presidency), so a downmerge seems more appropriate here. Nevertheless, I'm open to upmerging: the important thing is that this redundancy be removed. Nyttend (talk) 03:36, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The target name matches the titles of the members worse. The pages contained generally do not include the word "administration". Category titles should follow article titles. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 15:45, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
