The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I wouldn't agree that everything that existed deserves a category. The main concern is that the one member of this category remains in the Primates tree, and fortunately that is the case because he was an Archbishops of Mainz, hence a primate. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Categorization is redundant, the two articles in this category already refer to each other in the text of the article, while the child category does not belong here. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete this and its siblings are a "current" category. Political parties are banned, unbanned, etc., with remarkable frequency. The Nazi Party is in the German sister category. Banned now, but not in 1920-1945. Where are the all the now-OK parties of Germany that were banned from 1933-1945, like SPD?? Oh, they're not banned now, so we don't categorize them as banned. Thus, these categories are merely "current" and that which is transitory isn't defining. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 05:30, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Award is not significant enough to warrant categorisation on the subject articles. The topic is much better dealt with by the list already at Sheffield Legends. SFB19:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
deleteCategory:Cybersecurity since it does nothing but point back to itself and has no content whatsoever. Does anyone actually read and think about the category being nominated or are editors just looking at names and reacting. Hmains (talk) 05:05, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
