The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: To more clearly indicate that this is a people category, not a title category. By the way, the text of the header assumes that it is a title category, but that does not match with the actual use of the category. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both this nomination and an expansion to the noble titles tree as all the ones I checked are trees for people mainly, not just titles. "Nobility by title" allows us to include both. SFB22:26, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment is there a distinguishing between theatres no longer used as theatres, but still existing, and theatre buildings that are no longer theatres but have been renovated into something else? And theatre buildings than have been destroyed/demolished? -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 04:26, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: These incidents are not in any sense an "epidemic". This category was created and named by a disruptive, now-blocked user, who created hundreds of pages and nearly 50 categories in pursuit of an anti-alcohol POV. At the AfD for the related article "Methanol outbreaks", consensus favored the name "List of methanol poisoning incidents" for that article. I believe this category should follow the same format. MelanieN (talk) 14:59, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per nom. Revelation Direct makes a good observation, but on that formulation I fear we'll have lots of one-off bio's of wives and husbands who have been murdered by methanol showing up. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This is a completely unnecessary category. We already have Category:South African Army officers (a subcat of SA Army personnel), Category:South African Air Force personnel and Category:South African Navy personnel, all falling under Category:South African military personnel. This extra category will just add confusion. Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - As above. There are other categories which consolidate the officers of the various arms of service for other countries. BoonDock (talk) 08:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:speedy redirected. No prejudice against a comprehensive discussion if anyone feels that all of the sibling categories should be at "sport" instead of "sports", but as long as they are at "sports" this one needs to follow suit. Bearcat (talk) 19:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is an empty category that simply duplicates another category that already existed, so it can simply be {{categoryredirect}}ed to the existing category name without requiring discussion — and even if this were populated and the proposed target didn't already exist, this could still have been cfr-speedied as a C2C for conformity with its siblings. That said, however, the overall parent for this tree is Category:Sport in Canada rather than "sports", so there may actually be a case to be made for renaming all the subcats of Category:Canadian sports by year — but that would require a comprehensive discussion well outside the scope of this particular nomination alone. Speedy redirected. Bearcat (talk) 19:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Why use the word overseas? From Vietnam to Europe you don't necessarily go over a sea. I admit there's currently not an article about Vietnamese commerce in Europe, but I presume it's not the intention of this category to exclude this? Marcocapelle (talk) 20:09, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
