Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 July 1

July 1

edit

Category:20th-century Lebanese illustrators

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: underpopulated category. Upmerge for now. SMasonGarrison 22:12, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bohemian emigrants to the Thirteen Colonies

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge for now. underpopulated category at the intersection of two former countries SMasonGarrison 22:01, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Events by country and city

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename per precedent about splitting organized events versus past events, see earlier discussions at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_February_26#Historical_events_categories and Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_May_16#Events_by_location. I have already moved battles, disasters, etc. to the history tree, so the remainder is organized events. After this the city subcategories can follow, hopefully they can be speedied. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:07, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1550s treaties

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:OCYEAR; Not enough pages to require dividing them into individual years. – numbermaniac 18:13, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Plurilateral relations

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:36, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I don't see the difference between these two categories. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:24, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Plurilateral means multiple countries (essentially an extension of bilateral), multilateral means basically any and all countries in the context of organizations (i.e. the UN or the WHO). GreekApple123 (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Trilateral relations

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:37, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not enough content to warrant this layer. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:24, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Canada–United Kingdom–United States relations

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:37, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unneeded one-item category whose sole member isn't really about foreign relations at all. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:24, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bangladesh–India–Pakistan–United Kingdom relations

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:37, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unneeded one-item category, the sole member seems to be in appropriate parents. This will leave a large number of content-free parent layers empty. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:17, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Color navigational boxes

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category newly created for just one navigational box. Since Category:Color templates already exists, and the one navigational box filed here is already in it alongside this (and was already in it before this got created, to boot), this is also potentially just redundant -- I'm willing to withdraw this if there's a consensus that it would be useful to move navigational boxes from the other category, but it isn't needed for just one thing if nobody actually sees any value in segregating navbox templates from non-navbox templates in this context. Bearcat (talk) 14:03, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Daffodil International University

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Eponymous category for a thing without enough spinoff content to justify an eponymous category. The only article filed here is the eponym itself, while the other contents here are associated image files -- but non-free image files aren't allowed to be galleried in articlespace categories, and since the images are both already in the eponymous article as it is, they don't need a category to group them for browsability purposes with the same article that they're already in. Bearcat (talk) 13:58, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hee haw cast members

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:PERFCAT. Per longstanding consensus, we do not categorize performers for their status as members of individual television, radio, film or theatre casts, as that would lead to extreme category bloat as they were progressively added to another category for every cast they had ever been in, potentially swelling into hundreds of cast categories for people with long enough careers. And even if there were a valid reason to treat Hee Haw as a special exception, it would still have to be moved to fix the incorrect capitalization of "haw" here anyway. Bearcat (talk) 13:45, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Westampton Township, New Jersey

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Match title of parent article at Westampton, New Jersey Alansohn (talk) 13:31, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Countries results at Mister World

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: underpopulated category. upmerge for now SMasonGarrison 13:17, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:American companies disestablished in 1811

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge/delete * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Each of these categories only has 1 article, so these category intersections are not necessary.
The "Companies disestablished in [year] by country" categories have been nominated because they would become empty after these categories are merged. – numbermaniac 06:57, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:19th-century Armenian illustrators

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Category is underpopulated SMasonGarrison 04:41, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Social and solidarity economy

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:37, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Hodgepodge of unrelated things that doesn't make to a coherent category (and perverts logic by making Category:Sharing an indirect subcat of Category:Democracy, among other things). * Pppery * it has begun... 04:00, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. UsernamesArePublic.Unfortunately. (talk) 17:01, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bahamian directors

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Redundant category upmerge for now SMasonGarrison 03:24, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Democratic Republic of the Congo virologists

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only 1 entry. Also merge with Category:Democratic Republic of the Congo scientists.

Also nominating for merge:


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.