Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 July 12
July 12
editCategory:Vegetation templates
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:49, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Vegetation templates to Category:Botany navigational boxes
- Nominator's rationale: I propose upmerging the only template in the category – Template:Vegetation – into the parent category Botany navigational boxes. —andrybak (talk) 23:49, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:12, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- No objections as the category creator. This category has been around since 2007, and has been heavily repurposed over the years - I don't know what happened with its original content (possibly already moved over, e.g., [1]). The Botany category was only created in 2023, but the 2016-era Vegetation template fits well into it. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:25, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 15:40, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Stanley Cup Finals
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 16:13, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Stanley Cup Finals to Category:Stanley Cup Final
- Nominator's rationale: This may qualify as WP:C2D in response to Talk:Stanley Cup Final#RfC/RM on "Final" vs "Finals" (discussion can be seen here), though this request was challenged by one editor. Left guide (talk) 22:35, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- I do not understand the nomination. This is a set category with multiple finals, right? Marcocapelle (talk) 06:14, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose whilst each event may be a Final, this is a category of Final articles, so should use Finals? Joseph2302 (talk) 17:44, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Keep per Joseph2302. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Neomexicano slave owners
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:50, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Underpopulated category and it's not clear to me that this intersection is defining given that there is no Category:Neomexicano people. SMasonGarrison 22:17, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Smasongarrison What happened to the other people in the category? Somebody emptied it. It would be worth finding out why before this category is deleted. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 17:37, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- I suspect that JPL removed them [2] SMasonGarrison 20:00, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- @User:Johnpacklambert If so, what was the reason for removal? Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 02:36, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- I suspect that JPL removed them [2] SMasonGarrison 20:00, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Smasongarrison What happened to the other people in the category? Somebody emptied it. It would be worth finding out why before this category is deleted. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 17:37, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:15, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 15:41, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Mister World templates
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:50, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Propose splitting Category:Mister World templates to Category:Mister World and Category:Beauty pageant templates
- Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. This template category only has
onetwo templates in it SMasonGarrison 20:57, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge at least to Category:Beauty pageant templates. I am not sure if templates belong directy in the other parent category. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:17, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per Marco. -- Just N. (talk) 15:42, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Proto-punk groups
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:50, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Proto-punk groups to Category:Protopunk groups
- Nominator's rationale: Merge newly created category into previously existing category. Gjs238 (talk) 20:03, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Manually merge, the articles may already be in the tree of Category:Protopunk groups by nationality. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:34, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support manually merge, but leave this category as a redirect to prevent it from being recreated in the future. SMasonGarrison 21:01, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 15:44, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Monarchs of Epirus
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Heads of state of former countries. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:52, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Monarchs of Epirus to Category:Kings of Epirus
- Nominator's rationale: Redundant layer (0 P, 1 C). NLeeuw (talk) 18:49, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose You removed the Category:Despots of Epirus from the category before nominating it, right? Conveniently overlooking several centuries of monarchs. Dimadick (talk) 19:19, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- I was unable to confirm that in the edit history. - RevelationDirect (talk) 13:25, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Alt merge to Category:Heads of state of former countries, the two former countries under the name of Epirus are entirely unrelated. There is more than 1000 years in between. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:32, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Alt Merge per Marcocapelle to distinguish between the ancient and medieval. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:45, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Alt Merge per Marco. -- Just N. (talk) 15:45, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Croatian monarchs
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:52, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Croatian monarchs to Category:Monarchs of Croatia
- Nominator's rationale: Same scope. Parents Category:People of medieval Croatia, Category:Heads of state of Croatia, Category:Heads of state of former countries indicate per WP:C2C the name should be of Croatia. NLeeuw (talk) 18:42, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:48, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nom, but merge and leave a redirect. SMasonGarrison 20:59, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 15:46, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Serb families
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:53, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Serb families to Category:Serbian families
- Nominator's rationale: Manually merge per WP:NARROWCAT, WP:OVERLAPCAT. The only child categories not already in Category:Serbian families are:
- Category:Dedijer family, already in Category:Bosnia and Herzegovina families; I propose manually moving this from Category:Serb families to Category:Serbs of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Jevto Dedijer is already in it, and the other two would fit in as well).
- Category:Radonjić–Rajićević family, already in Category:Montenegrin noble families; I propose manually moving this from Category:Serb families to Category:Serbs of Montenegro.
- The only articles not already in Category:Serbian families are:
- Ruđić; I propose manually moving this article from Category:Serb families to Category:Serbs of Montenegro.
- Sinobad, which is already in Category:Croatian families, Category:Republic of Venice families, and Category:Serbs of Croatia etc.; I propose purging this article from Category:Serb families before the merger. NLeeuw (talk) 17:30, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Manually empty per nom. Too much overlap. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:49, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 15:47, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Albanian monarchs
editRelisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 July 20#Category:Albanian monarchs
Category:Annenberg
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:55, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Annenberg to Category:Annenberg Foundation
- Nominator's rationale: I think we should rename this to Annenberg Foundation and purge it so it avoids the pitfall of being a category of things named after the Category:Annenberg family SMasonGarrison 16:42, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note I moved Ranch A to Category:Annenberg family parent category. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:55, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Rename Really per WP:C2D since Annenberg Foundation is the de facto main article. Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts was the only article I thought should be purged. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:55, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Renamee per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 15:49, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Celtic families
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:54, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Another language family / geography WP:OR WP:ARBITRARYCAT WP:CROSSCAT. Follow-up to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 July 22#Category:Celtic clans, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of Celtic clans, Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 April 21#Category:Celtic women, etc. As these precedents have established, it is inappropriate to label anyone 'Celtic' after the year 500 BCE. Celts (modern) is a modern idea about the identity of people living in certain modern regions of Europe, whether they actually speak any Celtic language or not, and whether they actually self-identify with it or not. I took some samples from Category:Cornish families (basically all of them), Category:Irish families, and Category:Scottish families. None of them was about families mentioned in sources before the year 1000 BCE, none of them was about anything 'Celtic' (except maybe their surname), and many of these families immigrated from elsewhere, e.g. to Cornwall from England, Normandy, Brittany, Ireland etc. so that we can't assume that they even spoke Celtic languages, or that if they did, this was WP:DEFINING for who they were as a family. For comparison: all other siblings in Category:European families are defined by nationality (except Category:Germanic families, which I have just speeded to be renamed to Early Germanic families, because that category tree is limited to pre-1200 people and groups of people by long-standing consensus). There is no Category:Slavic families, no Category:Romance families or Category:Latin families, no Category:Baltic families etc., and rightly so. NLeeuw (talk) 16:34, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, the suggestion of the category is that these are speakers of a Celtic language. But you can't establish that for a whole family, even less for all e.g. Welsh families. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:44, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A ridiculous category, and the first article I clicked through to isn't so much a "Celtic" family as an Anglo-Norman family who were one of the colonisers of Ireland. Not Celtic at all, at least back then! BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 16:59, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 15:51, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Countries results at Miss Universe
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:55, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Countries results at Miss Universe to Category:Miss Universe templates
- Nominator's rationale: highly overlapping SMasonGarrison 15:52, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge, the templates should be in a templates category. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:46, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 15:51, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Military history of the Byzantine Empire
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:55, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Military history of the Byzantine Empire to Category:Byzantine military
- Nominator's rationale: Since the Byazantine empire no longer exists everything it (or its army) did is by definition history; also these two categories form a loop. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:51, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. I already broke the loop. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:48, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 15:52, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Battles involving the Mongols
editRelisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 July 20#Category:Battles involving the Mongols
Category:Egyptian beauty pageant templates
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:56, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Egyptian beauty pageant templates to Category:Beauty pageant templates
- Nominator's rationale: underpopluated category. only one template in here SMasonGarrison 15:49, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:59, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 15:54, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:James River Watershed
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:56, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: This category forms a loop with Category:James River (Virginia) and is not a defining characteristic of Chesapeake Bay Interpretive Buoy System. Manually move Category:James River (Virginia) up to Category:Chesapeake Bay watershed. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:45, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Manually empty per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:00, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 15:55, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Attempted assassinations of presidents of the United States
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:57, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Rename per actual content, and to more clearly distinguish from successful assasinations, which are in a separate category (that is currently forming a category loop with this one). * Pppery * it has begun... 15:39, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support in principle if Category:Assassinations of presidents of the United States is Purged as suggested by nom. NLeeuw (talk) 18:30, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Rename per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 15:56, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Face of Beauty International
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:57, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Delete for now. this only contains the eponymous article and the logo. SMasonGarrison 15:01, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete in the spirit of WP:C2F. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:02, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 15:57, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:2013 crimes in New Jersey
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:57, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:2013 crimes in New Jersey to Category:2010s crimes in New Jersey and Category:2013 in New Jersey
- Propose merging Category:2016 crimes in New Jersey to Category:2010s crimes in New Jersey and Category:2016 in New Jersey
- Propose merging Category:2018 crimes in New Jersey to Category:2010s crimes in New Jersey and Category:2018 in New Jersey
- Propose merging Category:2019 crimes in New Jersey to Category:2010s crimes in New Jersey and Category:2019 in New Jersey
- Nominator's rationale: Each of these categories only has 1-2 pages. Per WP:OCYEAR, suggesting a merge to the decade category. – numbermaniac 14:14, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Upmerge for now per WP:MFN. NLeeuw (talk) 16:45, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:03, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge for Now Currently too narrow to aid navigation, per WP:NARROWCAT. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:57, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Upmerge for now as the creator of these. A quick look at List of U.S. states and territories by population § State and territory rankings shows why it makes sense that only the 2010s crimes in California, Texas, Florida and New York should really need to be separated into subcats. I remember working hard to try and find more candidates for New Jersey, so I doubt there is much I could have overlooked. That being said, I'm pretty sure an Illinois-centric editor could come up with some entries to fill up a Category:2010s crimes in Illinois. StonyBrook babble 07:38, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed. I did a quick query on PetScan and it came up with 11 potential candidates for such a category. I haven't checked each page individually but it looks like there's enough for a decade-wide category there. – numbermaniac 06:37, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 15:57, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
National Gallery (Norway) → National Museum of Norway
editRelisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 July 21#National Gallery (Norway) → National Museum of Norway
Category:Orders of battle Russian invasion of Ukraine
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Russian invasion of Ukraine orders of battle. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 16:15, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Current category name is not grammatical in the English language. SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 09:33, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Alt rename to Category:Russian invasion of Ukraine orders of battle per WP:C2C, see Category:Orders of battle. The default formula is [name of conflict] orders of battle. NLeeuw (talk) 18:24, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Alt rename per WP:C2C. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:06, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Canadian people of Norman descent
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:58, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: merge, with few exceptions we do not categorize people by provincial descent. These are people of Normandian descent rather than Norman descent per se. The main article Norman Canadians is also of questionable quality. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:05, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge This weren't Norse immigrants, at least not with a lot of generations in between. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:59, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment aren't Channel Islanders also Norman, and not French of France? -- 65.93.183.181 (talk) 17:30, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 16:00, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Crime in the Dutch East Indies by type
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:58, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Merging is unnecessary, the subcategory is already in Category:Social history of the Dutch East Indies. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:00, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nom SMasonGarrison 15:02, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 16:01, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:20th-century Slovenian novels. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:59, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:1999 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
- Propose merging Category:1998 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
- Propose merging Category:1997 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
- Propose merging Category:1993 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
- Propose merging Category:1990 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
- Propose merging Category:1987 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
- Propose merging Category:1985 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
- Propose merging Category:1999 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
- Propose merging Category:1963 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
- Propose merging Category:1961 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
- Propose merging Category:1942 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
- Propose merging Category:1938 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
- Propose merging Category:1937 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
- Propose merging Category:1913 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
- Propose merging Category:1904 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1900-2000
- Nominator's rationale: WP:OCYEAR. It makes more sense to group them into centuries since most decades are empty and some years have a single entry. TurboSuperA+(connect) 08:41, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- I haven't yet finished categorizing these novels. Only one decade - the 1920s - would be empty in the end. So I'd suggest grouping by decade rather than century. I think this would be more useful. 19th century novels may seem like a reasonable group, but there is a lot of difference between a novel from the 1900s and one from the 1950s or 1990s. Meanwhile, I'll wait to see what is decided. Robina Fox (talk) 14:56, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Instead of "1900-2000", it should be Category:20th-century Slovenian novels. See Category:20th-century novels for similar categories by nationality or language. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:12, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
I'll wait to see what is decided.
- @Robina Fox I'd suggest you continue adding novels so that we can see whether there are enough of them to justify grouping them by decade. TurboSuperA+(connect) 10:19, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Rather than that: 1900s - 2, 1910s - 1, 1930s - 3, 1940s - 1, 1950s - 1, 1960s - 5, 1970s - 3, 1980s - 5, 1990s - 20. This includes all current 1900 to 1999 Slovenian novel articles. Not enough, I expect, though perhaps the 1990s could be a separate subcat under 20th-century Slovenian novels. --- Robina Fox (talk) 16:29, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, I think it makes sense to create a subcat for 1990. TurboSuperA+(connect) 05:41, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- Rather than that: 1900s - 2, 1910s - 1, 1930s - 3, 1940s - 1, 1950s - 1, 1960s - 5, 1970s - 3, 1980s - 5, 1990s - 20. This includes all current 1900 to 1999 Slovenian novel articles. Not enough, I expect, though perhaps the 1990s could be a separate subcat under 20th-century Slovenian novels. --- Robina Fox (talk) 16:29, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- I haven't yet finished categorizing these novels. Only one decade - the 1920s - would be empty in the end. So I'd suggest grouping by decade rather than century. I think this would be more useful. 19th century novels may seem like a reasonable group, but there is a lot of difference between a novel from the 1900s and one from the 1950s or 1990s. Meanwhile, I'll wait to see what is decided. Robina Fox (talk) 14:56, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Alt merge to Category:20th-century Slovenian novels per Metropolitan90. Robina Fox, I would advise you not to create new categories unless you could put at least 5 articles in it. You might want to create an (offline) overview for yourself, to see which decades you could fill with at least 5 book articles; that's better than creating a category for every year in which at least 1 book was published. Good luck with it, and good day, NLeeuw (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Alt merge to Category:20th-century Slovenian novels per Metropolitan90. Create decade categories only if they can be decently populated (it looks like this is not the case yet). Marcocapelle (talk) 20:09, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Alt Merge per Metropolitan. -- Just N. (talk) 16:03, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Slovenian novels 1800-1900
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:59, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:1873 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1800-1900
- Propose merging Category:1881 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1800-1900
- Propose merging Category:1883 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1800-1900
- Propose merging Category:1893 Slovenian novels to Category:Slovenian novels 1800-1900
- Nominator's rationale: WP:OCYEAR. It wouldn't make sense to group them by decade because some decades would have only one entry. Grouping them by the century makes sense. TurboSuperA+(connect) 08:26, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Fine. I'll hold off adding to or creating these categories until this is decided. Robina Fox (talk) 14:47, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Instead of "1800-1900", it should be Category:19th-century Slovenian novels. See Category:19th-century novels for similar categories by nationality or language. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:13, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Alt merge to Category:19th-century Slovenian novels per Metropolitan90. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:10, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- I support altmerge SMasonGarrison 21:46, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Alt merge for Now to Category:19th-century Slovenian novels, but open to revisiting if we get a bunch more articles on Slovenian novels per WP:MFN. - RevelationDirect (talk) 02:00, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Alt merge. You're right, it's a better name. TurboSuperA+(connect) 10:16, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Alt Merge per Metropolitan. -- Just N. (talk) 16:04, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Cagua players
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:00, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: delete, not a defining characteristic. There is even no mention of it in the articles at all. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:33, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 16:05, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sabaneta, Barinas
editRelisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 July 21#Category:Sabaneta, Barinas
Category:User python-0.5
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:00, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:USERCAT for lacking any discernible collaborative function, compare Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_November_27#Category:User_fr-0.5, Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_November_19#Category:User_ru-0.5, Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/User/Archive/May_2007#Category:User_Hrkt-0.5. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:59, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, overly precise distinction. Maybe some of these users will reclassify themselves to level 1, which is fine. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:03, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, The users in the category page have the Python level 1 template, Not the Python level 0.5 template. 22f (Talk💬 • Contributions✏️) 02:38, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 16:07, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:French people of Norman descent
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:04, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: delete, these are French people whose parents came from the (former) province of Normandy. We do not normally categorize people by provincial descent in their own country. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:58, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete I was open minded that these might be defining for Norse Norman descent, but it looks like an off-Wikipedia source Is being used since the articles I looked at mentioned neither Normandy nor the Normans. - RevelationDirect (talk) 02:03, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Channel Islanders are Norman but not French of France... and there are historical people who should be clearly distinguishable, for the Duchy. -- 65.93.183.181 (talk) 17:29, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Secretaries-general of political parties
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Secretaries-general of political parties to Category:General secretaries
- Nominator's rationale: Highly overlapping. Merge target states that "This category is for holders of positions of General secretary, Secretary-general, First secretary or other associated titles, given to leaders of some international organizations political parties, trade unions and other organizations." SMasonGarrison 04:51, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose, there are not only secretaries-general of political parties but also of organizations such as UN, NATO, etc. Category:Secretaries-general of political parties fits perfectly well under Category:Leaders of political parties, in fact that would be a more appropriate merge target. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:02, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- So which would you prefer as an alternative merge target? @Marcocapelle SMasonGarrison 21:47, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- If merged then to Category:Leaders of political parties (but only if Category:General secretaries is also merged to Category:Leaders of organizations). Marcocapelle (talk) 05:47, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- So which would you prefer as an alternative merge target? @Marcocapelle SMasonGarrison 21:47, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Marcocapelle's comment. Category populated, many thanks. --NoonIcarus (talk) 01:23, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Marco. -- Just N. (talk) 16:11, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Leaders of political parties by ideology
edit- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:04, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Redundant category layer. SMasonGarrison 04:49, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge, we could add communists secretaries-general of course, but that would still be too little to make this useful as a separate category layer. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:15, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. -- Just N. (talk) 16:12, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.