Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 June 12

June 12

edit

Category:Deaths by LTTE suicide bomber

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 June 22#Category:Deaths by LTTE suicide bomber

Category:Tamil politicians assassinated by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 16:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The user who created this arbitrarily singled out victims of one ethnicity to reflect the editorial POV of a Sri Lankan newspaper [1] that has been criticized for biased coverage of the topic.[2]. Petextrodon (talk) 18:45, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lovers

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 June 22#Category:Lovers

Category:Artists supporting the protests in Thailand 2020–2021

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 16:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overcategorization by opinion or preference of an issue or topic. Not appropriate scope for a category. Paul_012 (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Columbus Discoverers players

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Split * Pppery * it has begun... 16:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: These two teams are completely unrelated to one another; they did not play in the same "Columbus," in the same league, at the same time or with any of the same players. Having one category for these two teams makes even less sense than it would to have one category for players of the San Diego Padres of the major and minor leagues; at least those teams represented the same city, played in the same ballpark, etc. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 15:36, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Volleyball players from Asahikawa

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 16:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category with just one entry. Also merge to Category:Volleyball players from Hokkaido

Also propose merging-

Category:Volleyball players from Muroran to Category:Sportspeople from Muroran and Category:Volleyball players from Hokkaido . Also a category with just one entry. Lost in Quebec (talk) 09:42, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Australian people of Italian-Jewish descent

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 16:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only 1 entry. Also merge with Category:Australian people of Italian descent and Category:People of Italian-Jewish descent.

Also nominating for merge:

LibStar (talk) 07:35, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Belgian Shia Muslims

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 16:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one article and he’s not Shia. Thepharoah17 (talk) 04:41, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bermudian Muslims

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 16:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one article in the category and he’s not Muslim. Already in relevant Bermudian cats. Thepharoah17 (talk) 03:24, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Brazilian Sunni Muslims

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 16:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only 1 article and he’s already in the Category:Brazilian Muslims and it doesn’t say in his article that he’s Sunni. Thepharoah17 (talk) 03:14, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Brazilian Shia Muslims

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 16:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The only article in the category is not a Shia Muslim. He’s already present in relevant Brazilian categories. Also propose deleting Category:Shia Islam in Brazil since it’s its parent cat and that’s it’s only child cat. Thepharoah17 (talk) 03:02, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:16th-century Indian inventors

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 16:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. This category is underpopulated, and there's not a nearby category (Category:17th-century Indian inventors) SMasonGarrison 02:38, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mikrani People of Nepal

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 June 22#Category:Mikrani People of Nepal