Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 June 26

June 26

edit

Category:Villages in Egypt

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 23:29, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Each governorate now has its own "Populated places in X Governorate" category making this much broader category obsolete as any article that would fit into this category would also fit into one of the more narrow categories. I have also gone through all the pages in this category to ensure ___location information is accurate and they are all in the appropriate governorate category. Giuliotf (talk) 21:46, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Schools accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename * Pppery * it has begun... 23:29, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The school divisions of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, the Northwest Accreditation Commission and the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools merged together to form one organization and that organization was eventually renamed Cognia. See also the history here[1] and the reference to "legacy agencies" here[2] Jahaza (talk) 21:36, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Schools accredited by the Northwest Accreditation Commission

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 23:29, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per the above. Jahaza (talk) 21:36, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Anthropomorphic weasels

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 July 4#Category:Anthropomorphic weasels

Category:British Secretaries of State

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Woko Sapien makes a god argument that JOBTITLES does indeed call for lowercase in this instance. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 15:10, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Make these categories conform to MOS:JOBTITLES. Woko Sapien (talk) 15:18, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's note: Just to be clear, none of these categories denote titles (the left column of MOS:JOBTITLES). A title must be completely unmodified, and these categories names are modified by virtue of being plural. Per the text: "a formal title for a specific entity...is addressed as a title or position in and of itself, is not plural, is not preceded by a modifier (including a definite or indefinite article), and is not a reworded description." Woko Sapien (talk) 13:59, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Political parties disestablished in the 1650s

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 23:29, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only 1 member in the 1651 category, and 1 member in the 1650s category. – numbermaniac 13:41, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Type 094 submarines

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 23:29, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:OVERCAT Category with only 1 eponymous article. Gjs238 (talk) 12:54, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Type 092 submarines

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 23:29, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:OVERCAT 1-article category and will always be a 1-article category. Only one boat of this class constructed. Gjs238 (talk) 12:51, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Roads in West Flanders

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 July 4#Category:Roads in West Flanders

Category:Organizations disestablished in 1769

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 23:29, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one page in each category - overcategorisation. – numbermaniac 04:36, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
More categories added at 18:10, 26 June 2025 (UTC).

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:UCA albums

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 23:29, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only entry is a redirect of a non-notable album released on a label with no mention in any article except being listed in discography article where the redirect points. UCA is also very ambiguous with, as far as I can tell from Discogs, at least 4 different labels that use/have used UCA. The category is just unhelpful as an aid for readers. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 03:26, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.