Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2025 June 24

24 June 2025

• Cheong Yoke Choy (history · last edit · rewrite) from [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. I've removed content copied from these six sources and have done my best to clean the page, but I strongly suspect there's still plenty of copyvio here that I've missed. Would appreciate if someone could take a second look. MCE89 (talk) 10:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @MCE89@WP:CP I have rewritten sections where issues have been flagged and have also had a look at the entire article to edit bits where potentially they may be issues. Please let me know if there is anything else I need to do in order for the article to be restored. Many thanks. NaKaTaTuNa (talk) 01:35, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Internet Governance Forum (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://igf.wgig.org/igf/Summary.Final.07.11.2006.htm (Archived 2025-06-24 at the Wayback Machine). There's a whole lot of other stuff - click-to-unhide "conference summaries" - on the same page that looks similar, but it's not clear so far how much is copy/pasted. Boud (talk) 12:30, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • This specific edit dates back to 20 June 2013. It largely consists of selecting key sentences. The IGF Secretariat asserts standard (Berne convention) copyright 2005-2007, and that's not 70 years ago. Boud (talk) 12:35, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • The same edit includes a wording error that 10 years a similar ("ago" is missing) copied verbatim from the source. Boud (talk) 12:54, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Second specific copyvio on this article: Internet Governance Forum (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/a68d65_bn_IGF.pdf (Archived 2025-06-24 at the Wayback Machine. The copyvio edit of 04:00, 18 June 2013 has a slightly edited copyvio Youth representation and activity was also sited to be a notable achievement of the original sentence Youth delegate representation and activity was also sited to be a notable achievement of this year's IGF that includes the original error "sited" for "cited". Boud (talk) 13:08, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Depending on how much work copyvio clerks are willing to do, I would tend to revdel the whole section from IGF I to IGF X, inclusive, and put the sources on the talk page for anyone willing to write encyclopedic summaries of the first ten IGF meetings. Trying to separate copy/pastes from original text could be quite a bit of work. So not quite WP:TNT, more like mini-TNT. Boud (talk) 13:08, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • UN copyright rules at Commons may help decide whether IGF materials are PD or not. Boud (talk) 19:40, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • The content in question should be deleted as unsourced WP:NOTDIR-violating cruft even if it isn't a copyvio. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:53, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Draft:Amon Temple (Siwa) (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.recuperando.com/en/classic-antiques/13764-zeus-ammone-barracco-museum-rome-terracotta. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:55, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    No copyright concern. Material is PD, license compatible, or ineligible for copyright protection. The editor now tells me that the content was copied/translated from the Wikipedia page at fr:Temple d'Amon (Siwa). — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:01, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]