Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 December 27

< Wikipedia:Files for deletion
< December 26 December 28 >

December 27

edit

File:EdgarSnyderPATBusStop.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:EdgarSnyderPATBusStop.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HoboJones (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nwflight253.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nwflight253.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ishwasafish (notify | contribs).
  • This is a bad fair use rationale. This is a high interest news story and the AP makes money by selling images exactly like this. They are losing out on potential revenue. The picture depicts the whole plane in relatively high resolution. If this were three or four months from now, fair use would make sense. But currrenlty, this jeopardizes the merchantability of this image. Relisted from: [1]I3409234 (talk) 00:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree...Too high resolution for an image to be fair use. Spikydan1 (talk) 21:27, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unless drastic changes are made.username 1 (talk) 00:56, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: high-resolution or not, a boring exterior shot of an aircraft with a stairway rolled up has absolutely no encyclopedic value when the article is about an event that took place inside the aircraft. An editor could take a free image of the aircraft tonight at the airport (weather notwithstanding) and it would have identical encyclopedic value to this article - little to none. --NellieBly (talk) 02:44, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Above Good Me.JPG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Above Good Me.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stellar comet15 (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amerrittrush81.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Not the best quality but it's free and now unorphaned. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amerrittrush81.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Packerfan22 (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Balacona ed.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Balacona ed.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Massaregbari (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BernadetteSeacrest2006.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BernadetteSeacrest2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bernadetteseacrest (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Heraldic achievement of Father Guy Selvester by Alexander Liptak.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Xeno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heraldic achievement of Father Guy Selvester by Alexander Liptak.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xanderliptak (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Heraldic achievement of John F. Kennedy by Alexander Liptak.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Xeno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heraldic achievement of John F. Kennedy by Alexander Liptak.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xanderliptak (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Heraldic achievement of Gilbert Edward Greenall, Esq. by Alexander Liptak.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Xeno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heraldic achievement of Gilbert Edward Greenall, Esq. by Alexander Liptak.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xanderliptak (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Heraldic achievement of Theodore Roosevelt by Alexander Liptak.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Xeno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heraldic achievement of Theodore Roosevelt by Alexander Liptak.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xanderliptak (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Heraldic achievement of the Office of the Lord Lyon King of Arms by Alexander Liptak.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Xeno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heraldic achievement of the Office of the Lord Lyon King of Arms by Alexander Liptak.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xanderliptak (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mcdonalds-logo.svg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by JamieS93 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:14, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mcdonalds-logo.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Koman90 (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Imnotdeadplatinumedition.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:52, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imnotdeadplatinumedition.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ahmedfarhat (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ADOLF HITLER an appreciation by Eustace Mullins.pdf

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ADOLF HITLER an appreciation by Eustace Mullins.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Adam Holland (notify | contribs).
  • This file is not linked to any works at Wikipedia. Further, one should question whether this is a work of the US Government. The body of the report would by such, however, this text as an appendix only appeared in the report of a committee. It would seem unlikely that this would extinguish copyright and put the work into the public ___domain. billinghurst (talk) 10:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405ad.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405ad.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405ae.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405ae.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405af.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405af.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405ah.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405ah.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405c.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405c.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405d.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405d.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405f.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405f.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405g.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405g.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405h.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405h.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405i.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405i.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405j.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405j.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405k.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405k.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405l.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405l.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405n.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405n.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405r.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405r.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405s.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405s.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405t.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405t.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405v.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405v.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405w.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405w.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405x.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405x.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405y.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405y.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405z.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405z.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:100th user editNew Picture123.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:100th user editNew Picture123.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Photoguy439 (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1337-neg1.gif

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:1337-neg1.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chortos-2 (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:17 article DYK hook.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:17 article DYK hook.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Doug Coldwell (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2005Nov TR3 wikipedia files.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2005Nov TR3 wikipedia files.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jakob Suckale (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2008 main page redesign proposal Kollision2.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008 main page redesign proposal Kollision2.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kollision (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2008 main page redesign study Cacycle 800x600 correct.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008 main page redesign study Cacycle 800x600 correct.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cacycle (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2008 main page redesign study Cacycle 800x600.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008 main page redesign study Cacycle 800x600.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by David Levy (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2008 main page redesign study Cacycle.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008 main page redesign study Cacycle.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cacycle (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2008 main page redesign study current 800x600.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008 main page redesign study current 800x600.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by David Levy (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:200theditNew Picture (8)y87y.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:200theditNew Picture (8)y87y.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Photoguy439 (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:010405b.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:010405b.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Esteffect (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:'What links here' screen shot 2-28-08 for talk page.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chuck Marean (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BBCworldident1999.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Wikiwoohoo (talk) 19:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BBCworldident1999.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs).
  • History of BBC television idents has too many fair use images. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 20:46, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (for now) Fair use image, no reason for selection of particular image billinghurst (talk) 22:46, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment That an article has too many fair use items would seem to be an issue about the article itself, not the individual images. This should be resolved by other means, and then non-free images that are unused should be deleted by the process that exists for such items. billinghurst (talk)
  • As to whether the article contains too many images as a whole, I dispute that. (See my comments on the two BBC1 logos below). After all, the very topic of the article is the history of the BBC's idents; and the legal fair use case is overwhelming.
With regard to this particular image, it's nothing particularly stunning; but I think the channel, as the representative of the BBC's global ambition, is significant; and the 1999 image is useful for showing when BBC World adopted the (basically still current) BBC News look, although it is also useful to show how this has subsequently been revised. Therefore, on balance, keep. Jheald (talk) 18:22, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I would also dispute that the article has too many images as a whole - it currently has 32 images describing the development of on-air identities on 9 broadcast channels over a cumulative broadcast period of 172 years; one image for every 6 broadcast years does not seem excessive, particularly as there are many more idents which could have been used. -- Arwel Parry (talk) 01:37, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BBC World 2007.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 19:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BBC World 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BBC-one-1985.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 19:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BBC-one-1985.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs).
  • See above listing Wikiwoohoo (talk) 20:52, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (provisional) see above billinghurst (talk) 22:47, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The "Computer Originated World" animation (or "COW") was - and to some extent still is - seen as completely groundbreaking. Generated live every usage for six years, it pushed the capability of computer graphics at the time to their limits, and radically dusted-off the BBC's face to the world. (Indeed it still stands up well today). See [2] for a good article on the technology behind it. The reader's understanding is hugely improved by being able to see, and assess for themselves, what is being talked about, and how it compared to what went before and what came after. This image is eminently justified under NFCC #8.
As for the general claim made above, the article does not contain "too many fair use images". It contains an appropriate number of fair use images for the purpose of directly adding to reader understanding of the very topic of the article, namely the History of BBC television idents -- and is in conformance both with U.S. Fair Use law (compare Bill Graham Archives vs. Dorling Kindersley) and with Wikipedia policy. See also discussion on the article talk page. Jheald (talk) 17:58, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BBC-one1991.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 19:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BBC-one1991.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs).
Moved from 28 December to keep discussion of the images together. Jheald (talk) 18:35, 28 December 2009 (UTC) [reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BBC World 1997.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 19:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BBC World 1997.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs).
Moved from 28 December to keep discussion of the images together. Jheald (talk) 18:35, 28 December 2009 (UTC) [reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Itv1-3d.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Itv1-3d.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aidsoo (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Itv1-jan06.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Itv1-jan06.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aidsoo (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_December_27&oldid=1142599670"