Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 December 5

< Wikipedia:Files for deletion

< December 4	December 6 >

December 5

File:DrWho42-2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File is no longer orphaned, nominator has withdrawn. — ξ ^xplicit 01:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DrWho42-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DoctorWho42 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, unknown person Zoo Fari 00:13, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown person is DoctorWho42.--DrWho42 (talk) 21:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw now that it's used. Zoo Fari 23:47, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reverse K.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reverse K.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Michael J (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality, superseded by File:Reverse K.png Zoo Fari 00:16, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WUSTLuserImage2007-01-26 15-11-40.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WUSTLuserImage2007-01-26 15-11-40.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lmbstl (notify | contribs).

Originally used for demonstration of {{User WUSTL}}. Obviously it doesn't go under that format nowadays, thus unneeded. Zoo Fari 00:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Skew3.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skew3.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SabbeRubbish (notify | contribs).

Originally for Skew heap, but replaced by an SVG and orphaned. JaGa^talk 00:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Skew1.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skew1.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SabbeRubbish (notify | contribs).

Originally for Skew heap but replaced by SVGs. JaGa^talk 00:22, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Skew2.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Image now at commons. Wizardman 02:08, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skew2.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SabbeRubbish (notify | contribs).

Originally for Skew heap but replaced by SVGs. JaGa^talk 00:23, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Skew6.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skew6.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SabbeRubbish (notify | contribs).

Originally for Skew heap but replaced by SVGs. JaGa^talk 00:23, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Skew7.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skew7.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SabbeRubbish (notify | contribs).

Originally for Skew heap but replaced by SVGs. JaGa^talk 00:23, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1-over-x-plus-x.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Image at commons showing. Wizardman 02:09, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:1-over-x-plus-x.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eraserhead1 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality, little encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 05:44, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ruthie Henshall.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruthie Henshall.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vicenarian (notify | contribs).

Orphaned and pointless when this file is available. Rockfang (talk) 08:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:White-phosperous-weapons2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:White-phosperous-weapons2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jim Fitzgerald (notify | contribs).

This is a copyrighted picture of white phosphorus munitions used by Israel during the last Gaza War, originally published by The Times of London. It's used in United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict. I don't think it significantly contributes to readers' understanding of the subject, and the article already has a free image (of these weapons in use) which serves the same purpose. Prezbo (talk) 21:49, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SANY0262.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SANY0262.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KatieSchmelter (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality, no value. JaGa^talk 21:51, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's what I've got. When we get a better picture, it will be replaced.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SANY0254.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SANY0254.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KatieSchmelter (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality, no value. JaGa^talk 21:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's of the lobby of AMC Country Club Mall movie theatre, thus, serves a purpose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KatieSchmelter (talk • contribs) 16:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SilenceLibrary1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SilenceLibrary1.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HenryPage23 (notify | contribs).

This image can clearly be replaced by text (the FUR claims it is necessary to illustrate a "key moment" in the episode, but the characters' relative positions can easily be described; if it were to show what the actors looked like, that would be different). ╟─Treasury Tag►constablewick─╢ 22:31, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The image's purpose isn't to describe their relative position, it is there to show what the character looks like, and to describe her relationship to the Doctor. — Edokter • Talk • 23:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That is not what the FUR says – it says, "Purpose of use: to show a scene from the episode, showing River Song sharing her memories with the Doctor." Aside from it being ungrammatical, it does not mention either of the things that you just did, namely (1) the actress' physical characteristics, and (2) her relationship to the Doctor. ╟─Treasury Tag►co-prince─╢ 12:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What parts of "showing River Song" and "sharing her memories" do not describe their purpose? If you are going to argue deletion based purely on technical grammar, you are going about it the wrong way; either fix the grammar of the FUR yourself, suggest how to do it, or come up with with a valid reason to delete. — Edokter • Talk • 21:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's not just the grammar, it's the content. Nothing in the FUR indicates either of the two purposes you suggested above. No part of, "to show a scene from the episode, showing River Song sharing her memories with the Doctor," involves what Alex Kingston looks like, and no part of, "to show a scene from the episode, showing River Song sharing her memories with the Doctor," is anything to do with her relationship with the Doctor. The FUR focusses entirely on the physical positions of the two people. ╟─Treasury Tag►Tellers' wands─╢ 21:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That is rediculous. If that were true, the FUR would read "River Song sits opposite the Doctor, facing 45 degrees toward the camera, while the Doctor is shown at a 10 degree angle." Do I really need to spell out every aspect? Images are there to prevent having to do that in the first place. You don't even notice River holding her blue book holding all her memoires. I shall put that in there as well. — Edokter • Talk • 23:30, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you mean that the purpose of the image is (and I quote you, from above) "to show what the character looks like, and to describe her relationship to the Doctor," then why, for Heaven's sake, doesn't the FUR say that? (And by 'that', I mean the text in quote-marks that I just typed.) Currently, it says something completely different. ╟─Treasury Tag►presiding officer─╢ 06:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_December_5&oldid=1146492936"