Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 January 26

< January 25	January 27 >

January 26

File:Plácido Domingo, 2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as I8 by Hmwith (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plácido Domingo, 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nrswanson (notify | contribs).

Duplicated photo with WikiCommon - Jay (talk) 04:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pbslogo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pbslogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Snobba (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 01:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pbxbear.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pbxbear.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Paulyb (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 01:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pbxoslogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pbxoslogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Paulyb (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 01:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pc_logo_2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pc_logo_2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lee_A_Bradley (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 01:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pc-inside.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pc-inside.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Directoryguru (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 01:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pc-load-letter.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pc-load-letter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KUsam (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Low quality Nv8200p talk 01:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pc1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pc1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Metal_Loaf (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Low quality, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 01:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pc3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pc3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Metal_Loaf (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 01:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pcdimmer31.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pcdimmer31.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Christian.noeding (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 01:05, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pcdlogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pcdlogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hainerob (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 01:05, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pcs_map.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pcs_map.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Iijam (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 01:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pcsk.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pcsk.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Iijam (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 01:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

PdCatalogueRGB.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PdCatalogueRGB.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tigeritasca (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 01:07, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pda1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pda1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Smarkham (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 01:07, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pdc.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pdc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cwernert (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Obsolete by File:PDC chimera cropped r3 c4.jpg Nv8200p talk 01:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pdm2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pdm2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Proudtobeaj (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 01:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

PearQn.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Daniel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PearQn.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Daniel (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 01:13, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

FSchmitt.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Result was delete. The subject's permission doesn't apply--he's clearly out in public, and we've long accepted such public photographs of both public and private individuals both here and over on the Commons side of the house. Licensing is fine, since it's PD, so no worries there, but it's still orphaned, and I agree that's very unlikely to change; and this Francois person doesn't appear to be anyone notable that we can use this in. So, delete based on it being an orphaned image of no particular value, and not on any licensing concerns and definitely not on the personality rights. rootology (C)(T) 21:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:FSchmitt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jb5-hy (notify | contribs).

The portrait lacks permission of the person being portrayed. Fenke (talk) 09:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of the subject's permission is irrelevant: the photograph was taken in a public place, and the subject is clearly aware that the photograph is being taken. --Carnildo (talk) 23:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not correct, you need the subjects permission to publish their portrait, public place or not. The subject's (assumed) awareness of their photo being taken does not automatically mean they would have been aware of their photograh being published worldwide. Their assumed permission for the photograph being taken does not automatically transform into a permission to publish it. Fenke (talk) 12:56, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In which legal system? In the US, personality rights only apply to commercial exploitation of someone's name or appearance. --Carnildo (talk) 09:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Define 'commercial'? How does GFDL/cc-sa-3 protect from commercial use? Btw, you are your changing your arguments, so I assume you'd agree your earlier arguments weren't very accurate? Fenke (talk) 10:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CC-BY-SA doesn't protect from commercial use. Personality rights law and caselaw define "commercial exploitation" in this situation, and provide the protection. It's independent of copyright. --Carnildo (talk) 11:05, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but when is it commercial, and when not? Wikipedia raises funds and has paid employees. We do use images with articles to make the product more attractive, which ultimately raises funds, although that serves the (non-commercial) goal of the project. Where is the line drawn? Fenke (talk) 11:35, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's still orphaned btw, and it's not likely that this will change. Fenke (talk) 11:35, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The line is a very complicated one, based on several hundred years of legislation and case law in hundreds of jurisdictions. As a gross simplification, if it bears at least a passing resemblance to advertising, it's covered. --Carnildo (talk) 01:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So, it would likely not be allowed to be used on the cover of a magazine but it would be allowed if it was placed with an article? Fenke (talk) 16:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, it is not suitable for the article it was added to. Fenke (talk) 09:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Type 64 MAT missile.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Type 64 MAT missile.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ominae (notify | contribs).

A free equivalent of this image could easily be created by any person with a camera. DavidDCM (talk) 09:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is already a free image related to it in the article and it may be possible to get a free equivilant. Lorax (talk) 02:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

KAMG squad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:KAMG squad.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ominae (notify | contribs).

Licence is "non-free TV screenshot", which says the image may only be used "for identification and critical commentary on the station ID or program and its contents". This does not happen. Image is only used in an article about the police unit. --DavidDCM (talk) 09:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC) DavidDCM (talk) 09:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

SST operators.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SST operators.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ominae (notify | contribs).

Licence is "non-free TV screenshot", which says the image may only be used "for identification and critical commentary on the station ID or program and its contents". This does not happen. Image is only used in an article about the police unit. --DavidDCM (talk) 09:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC) DavidDCM (talk) 09:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

SST Team.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SST Team.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ominae (notify | contribs).

CopyVio? "Non-free fair use"-licence. But a free image of this police unit could easily be created whenever they appear in public. DavidDCM (talk) 09:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Couch Casting From California Adventure.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Couch Casting From California Adventure.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jeremedia (notify | contribs).

Claims to be self-made public ___domain image, but it's just a photo of a logo. Damiens.rf 11:52, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

FacegarySpainLaserBeam.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:FacegarySpainLaserBeam.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xanni (notify | contribs).

Image is an orphan and not likely to be used in an article. Whpq (talk) 11:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete under WP:NOTMYSPACE. --Marianian (talk) 19:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

FacegaryIntro.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:FacegaryIntro.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xanni (notify | contribs).

Image is an orphan and not likely to have any future use in an article Whpq (talk) 11:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

DPR Crest.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as I5 by East718 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DPR Crest.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DPRVig (notify | contribs).

Unfree use image that isn't used in any article. -- Darth Mike (join the dark side) 14:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Chiasm-prefrontal-cdcover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Result was delete, per NFCC#8. rootology (C)(T) 21:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chiasm-prefrontal-cdcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KikiT (notify | contribs).

Decorative album cover in biographical article. PhilKnight (talk) 19:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Being used to identify the album in the section of the article discussing the album, in conformance with usual rules for WP:NFC. It is not being used at the top of the article to identify the singer. Jheald (talk) 11:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete = simple identification of a subject is insufficient to significantly increase reader's understanding - fails NFCC#8 - Peripitus (Talk) 21:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

WSVN_ANCHORS2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete is the consensus here, as this doesn't significantly expand the reader's understanding of the subject. NFCC#8 is also a concern here, and in practice we simply don't do this with the hundreds (thousands?) of such news broadcast articles. rootology (C)(T) 01:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WSVN_ANCHORS2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fredler_Brave (notify | contribs).

Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 19:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For this picture to fulfill its intended purpose, we would need a picture of every single staff member (which probably counts somewhere into the 40s). An individual article of certain staff would work somewhat better, but that isn't exactly necessary or needed as of today. Elm-39 - T/C 19:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The intended purpose of this image is to show how the newscast looks when the anchors are at the desk, this includes what parts of the studio are visible and what graphics are overlaid. It is unnecessary to have pictures of all the anchors to fill this purpose. Lorax (talk) 02:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Vivi_gonzo_Weasvn.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete is the consensus here, as this doesn't significantly expand the reader's understanding of the subject. NFCC#8 is also a concern here, and in practice we simply don't do this with the hundreds (thousands?) of such news broadcast articles. rootology (C)(T) 01:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vivi_gonzo_Weasvn.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fredler_Brave (notify | contribs).

Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 19:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For this picture to fulfill its intended purpose, we would need a picture of every single staff member (which probably counts somewhere into the 40s). An individual article of certain staff would work somewhat better, but that isn't exactly necessary or needed as of today. Elm-39 - T/C 19:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The intended purpose of this image is to show how the newscast looks during the weather report, this includes what parts of the studio are visible, or even if parts of the studio are visible. It is unnecessary to have pictures of all the Meteorologists to fill this purpose. Lorax (talk) 02:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

WSVN_reporterMB.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete is the consensus here, as this doesn't significantly expand the reader's understanding of the subject. NFCC#8 is also a concern here, and in practice we simply don't do this with the hundreds (thousands?) of such news broadcast articles. rootology (C)(T) 01:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WSVN_reporterMB.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fredler_Brave (notify | contribs).

Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 19:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For this picture to fulfill its intended purpose, we would need a picture of every single staff member (which probably counts somewhere into the 40s). An individual article of certain staff would work somewhat better, but that isn't exactly necessary or needed as of today. Elm-39 - T/C 19:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The intended purpose of this image is to show how the newscast looks during an on-___location shot, this includes what graphics are overlaid on the newscast. It is unnecessary to have pictures of all the reporters to fill this purpose. Lorax (talk) 02:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As a reader I don't need to see photos of TV news screenshots to understand an article on a TV station or the news content they provide. For me this image adds nothing useful and fails the significance requirement - Peripitus (Talk) 02:50, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Donovan_campbell324.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete is the consensus here, as this doesn't significantly expand the reader's understanding of the subject. NFCC#8 is also a concern here, and in practice we simply don't do this with the hundreds (thousands?) of such news broadcast articles. rootology (C)(T) 01:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Donovan_campbell324.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fredler_Brave (notify | contribs).

Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 19:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For this picture to fulfill its intended purpose, we would need a picture of every single staff member (which probably counts somewhere into the 40s). An individual article of certain staff would work somewhat better, but that isn't exactly necessary or needed as of today. Elm-39 - T/C
Keep. The intended purpose of this image is to show how the newscast looks during the sports report, this includes what parts of the studio are visible, or even if parts of the studio are visible. It is unnecessary to have pictures of the entire sports team to fill this purpose. Lorax (talk) 02:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Arse,_Elton.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arse,_Elton.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Notle (notify | contribs).

Orphan, not ensyclopedic, absent uploader. Sherool (talk) 20:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I concur. Speedy delete as per WP:NOTMYSPACE. --Marianian (talk) 19:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Archer282.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Archer282.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Archer282 (notify | contribs).

Unused "personal logo" (user blanked his userpage). Sherool (talk) 20:24, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Aselsan logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aselsan logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jedi-gman (notify | contribs).

Orphaned. I don't know if the PD-self licence could also be problematic, but I think there's no treshold of originality in this logo, so the main reason is still "Orphaned". DavidDCM (talk) 20:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Garbage-garbage.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted, per nomination. The alternate cover is not itself notable, or helpful to the understanding of the album. Alternate covers are exceptionally common and typical, and not particularly notable for the extra fair use under NFCC. If this one was talked about and discussed in it's own right, I would close as Keep, but that's not the case here. rootology (C)(T) 01:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garbage-garbage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Avala (notify | contribs).

Alternate release album cover for a cd release. The image is, at thumbnail size, identical (except possibly for some shade differences) to the headline non-free image. As a close to identical image it does not significantly add to reader's understanding (fails WP:NFCC#8), could be described with text "the re-release used the same artwork" (fails WP:NFCC#1) and is excessive and unneccesary use of copyrighted work (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 23:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MinistryWorkForLove.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted, per nomination. The alternate cover is not itself notable, or helpful to the understanding of the album. Alternate covers are exceptionally common and typical, and not particularly notable for the extra fair use under NFCC. If this one was talked about and discussed in it's own right, I would close as Keep, but that's not the case here. rootology (C)(T) 01:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MinistryWorkForLove.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ph0en1x Mayhem (notify | contribs).

Alternate release album cover for With Sympathy by the band Ministry. The image is, at thumbnail size, identical (except for some shade differences and a single piece of text) to the headline non-free image. As a close to identical image it does not significantly add to reader's understanding (fails WP:NFCC#8), could be described with free text "for the Europoean release the title was changed to Work for Love but the original artwork was kept" (fails WP:NFCC#1) and is excessive and unneccesary use of copyrighted work (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 23:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.