| < October 17 | October 19 > |
|---|
October 18
edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair-use image of a living person, used only to identify that person. Blueboy96 01:15, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it's an image of about when she won her Olympic medal, a current photo would not indicate what she looked like when she was famous. 76.66.194.183 (talk) 01:54, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Replaceable fair use image of a living person. Aspects (talk) 15:27, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Enemyslanguage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aesculapius75 (notify | contribs).
- Now available on Commons. Since I made tweaks to it, I'm unable to F8 it. ZooFari 04:37, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Decorative non-free image, with a terrible rationale explaining that pictures of dead people are fair use under US law. Damiens.rf 16:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:VaughanWilliams2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sallyrob (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image with unverifiable source information. Damiens.rf 16:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Decorative image with unclear /unverifiable copyright holder and licensing info. Damiens.rf 16:21, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Scan001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gabuandmei (notify | contribs).
- Not used. Not useful. Damiens.rf 16:22, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No license, doubt it is free. ZooFari 17:14, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Altec Lansing Logo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jovianeye (notify | contribs).
- replaced this image with PNG version Jovianeye (talk) 18:41, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Karla foxnews.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Absinthe999 (notify | contribs).
- The screenshot is used in LaVey's article to identify her without critical commentary of the television show or television network against Wikipedia:Non-free content and against "for identification and critical commentary on the station ID or program and its contents" from the licensing agreement. Also since the file is being used to identify her and she is still alive, this is a replaceable fair use image. Aspects (talk) 21:06, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Replaceable non-free content. Garion96 (talk) 21:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I wonder if being used as a source is enough for an image to pass all non-free content criteria. But since it is now sourced that she was on fox news, it really should be deleted. Garion96 (talk) 16:43, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, It is the only reference for her appearance on Fox News and is NOT replaceable. It has contextual significance. It increases the readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. I couldn't find a reference that she appeared on Fox News, and the photo serves as a visual reference. It is not used for decoration or for identification of her. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 21:32, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I added a reference for a Fox News appearance from FoxNews.com, so now the image is no longer needed to prove she appeared on Fox News. Aspects (talk) 15:26, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, per Richard Arthur Norton. Absinthe (Talk) 02:12, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G6 by Alexf (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Eden Graham.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Omega0male (notify | contribs).
- photograph of non-notable person who is about to be speedily deleted. Drmies (talk) 23:24, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom =D. Interesting, he even uploaded a picture to use in a NN article... Netalarmtalk 23:27, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It reminds me of when I was young and foolish and had hair. Drmies (talk) 23:55, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Admin notice: image deleted as "NN image uploaded by indef vandal". No sense in wasting time and resources. -- Alexf(talk) 00:20, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ha, that reminds me of me too, in another life. Drmies (talk) 01:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Admin notice: image deleted as "NN image uploaded by indef vandal". No sense in wasting time and resources. -- Alexf(talk) 00:20, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It reminds me of when I was young and foolish and had hair. Drmies (talk) 23:55, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.