Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 March 11

< March 10	March 12 >

March 11

File:KCAllIEverWantedSingle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

there is no official source for an album cover, one has yet to be released, this is a fan-made image using photoshop (as per file information) source of file is an non-working url (site does not exist) possibly blatent hoaxAlan - talk 01:20, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, aside from everything else, this is an orphaned nonfree image. Nyttend (talk) 15:08, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TCA.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:17, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A better image has been created and has superceded the need for this diagram. I'm it's creator and I see no reason to keep this around. Adenosine ^talk 01:34, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OJCL logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another version of this logo image exists at File:JCL Seal transparent.png. Those images are better because this image uses an incorrect color scheme (i.e. this image uses various shades of gray while it should use just black and white). Also, this image is no longer used in any Wikipedia page (it has been replaced with the aforementioned image on the article Ohio Junior Classical League). Oxguy the 3rd (talk) 02:12, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep User:Oxguy3 (who also identifies him/herself as Oxguy the 3rd) is responsible for removing the image under discussion from Ohio Junior Classical League (OJCL). I consider this edit unconstructive as the image not only is from an official OJCL source, but is also properly cited-- moreover, the image used as a replacement (used for National Junior Classical League article) is neither properly sourced nor properly cited. User:Oxguy3 apparently removed the first image solely for aesthetic reasons-- nowhere in the the organization's by-laws (cited in the OJCL article here) does it specify any characteristics not found in the first image or found in the replacement image. The two images are also nearly identical. Whether the background is grey or white -- which seems to be Oxguy the 3rd's main issue -- is irrelevant. Restoring first image to OJCL article ~~and removing its deletion tag.~~ MisterE2123two (talk) 21:11, 11 March 2010 (UTC) Further, slightly different images helps to differentiate between OJCL and NJCL MisterE2123two (talk) 21:29, 11 March 2010 (UTC) Restoring deletion tag until issue officially resolved.MisterE2123two (talk) 22:53, 11 March 2010 (UTC) Indifferent. MisterE2123two (talk) 04:23, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Elkhart County Road shields

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Redundant. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:01, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong typeface, incorrect shield specs, no source/license information. Correct replacements are being uploaded to Commons to replace them. Imzadi1979 (talk) 02:17, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong typeface, incorrect shield specs, no source/license information. Correct replacements are being uploaded to Commons to replace them. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 03:14, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- A set of correct shields has been uploaded to Commons at commons:Category:Indiana County Route shields using the correct typefaces, consistent typesetting (some of the shields nominated here have "Elkhart" instead of "ELKHART" at the top) and a consistent naming scheme. They also have correct image information allowing for a clear determination of the correct copyright status, source information and creator. Imzadi1979 (talk) 15:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as superseded by the Commons images. Nyttend (talk) 15:08, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Canadageeseatlake.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:33, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copy to Commons. It's a fine, freely licensed picture of Canada geese. —Bkell (talk) 09:59, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, nothing wrong with this image. Nyttend (talk) 15:01, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Deathvalleywildflowers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:34, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copy to Commons. —Bkell (talk) 10:00, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, a fine image that's great for Death Valley. Nyttend (talk) 15:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coot on Lake.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:34, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mgsgntre.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 08:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:3ssgntre.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 21:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 08:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, used on userpage; I've just added this to the userpage, but it appears that the user intended to add it some months ago. Nyttend (talk) 15:06, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gordonfilingpresidency.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use, possible copyvio. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 08:24, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but only because we have a better picture at Richard Gordon (politician). I can't imagine this being a copyvio, as it's poor enough quality that there's virtually no chance that someone would have copied this from somewhere else. Nyttend (talk) 15:02, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:818hangtag copy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; no context provided for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 09:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, useless. Nyttend (talk) 15:06, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:818hangtagback copy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; no context provided for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 09:10, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, useless. Nyttend (talk) 15:06, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ftdemo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; no context provided for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 09:12, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, useless. Nyttend (talk) 15:06, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bitchy.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G10 by Luna Santin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:17, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no educational purpose, likely a personal attack. Hekerui (talk) 13:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Happened to notice this in a "badwords" bot's feed.) Speedy deleted per WP:CSD#G10 for attack pages. – Luna Santin (talk) 13:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Altec lansing iPod Speakers.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A FU image is wholly unjustifiable, as it is replaceable. ÷seresin 19:34, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, while I'm not a good enough photographer to replace it, there are plenty of people who are good enough. Nyttend (talk) 15:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rbocs.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#1. Replaceable with text. Rettetast (talk) 20:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vulcan pharmacy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LQ. Too dark, date stamp. BC _{talk to me} 23:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Noentry.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Noentry.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Woodysee (notify|).

Superior quality exists in the form of a png file File:Noentry sing.png. FASTILY_sock^{13:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Height.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Height.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Woodysee (notify|).

Superior quality exists in the form of a png file File:Sing heightrestriction.png. FASTILY_sock^{13:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Weight.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weight.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Woodysee

Superior quality exists in the form of a png file File:Sing heightrestriction.png. FASTILY_sock13:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.