| < November 7 | November 9 > |
|---|
November 8
edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphan 78.55.55.46 (talk) 06:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Erick Ungarelli.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Erick Ungarelli (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unencyclopedic 189.73.234.92 (talk) 08:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lakehurstinside1971.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jonrev (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Tagged with {{PD-Pre1978}}, but there's no evidence of pre-1978 publication without a copyright notice. This was tagged with {{npd}}, but that process is meant for allegedly freely-licensed images or intentional PD releases, not images like this that are claimed to have fallen into the public ___domain without the intention of the copyright holder. Nyttend (talk) 14:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- FWIW, I've always interpreted "evidence of permission" a little more broadly than you have described, to mean any case where it is not 100% clear that it is permissible for us to use the image freely. Thus lack of evidence that an image has actually passed into the public ___domain to me = lack of evidence of permission. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 November 18. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:20, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dale Robertson Racist Sign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by CartoonDiablo (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Speedily renominating after neutral close due to out-of-process !votes fouling the discussion after a relist, causing it to be fragmented.
Original nomination by Angus McLellan was: "Image was tagged replaceable fair use, but an objection was raised so it may as well be discussed here. Case for replaceable seemed reasonable to me. Stifle's argument for replaceability was: "Replaceable by/redundant to the free textual description in the article. Also probable violation of WP:NFCC#2." That seems right to me too: fails to meet NFCC #1 and #2." SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:21, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply] - Delete per my previous argument. Stifle (talk) 09:23, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - replaceable with text. Agree there could also be NFCC #2 concerns. PhilKnight (talk) 01:05, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.