Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 25

< September 24	September 26 >

September 25

File:Messy on the Inside.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Book cover, uploader unlikely owns copyright. — ξ ^xplicit 03:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom, also image is orphaned. Sven Manguard _Talk 03:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cxfgjdjdftjdfrjfdjyfgjghdfi.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

fan art including multiple images, none sourced Skier Dude (talk 04:07, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Orphaned, crap image, no possible reasonable use. (Only the first and third reason hold weight, but the second needed to be said. Sven Manguard _Talk 03:19, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dynamo Earthquakes.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Probable copright violation. Uploader marked it as Free Art license after it was originally tagged and removed from articles. Source shows a copyright and permission states "promotional" which is questionable. If the uploader is the original author he can follow the OTRS process before this is deleted. There has not been a response over at their talk and there is a history of questionable uploads. Cptnono (talk) 04:35, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Orphan. The lisence may or may not be legit, I don't if Free Art supersedes the rights of the owners of the buildings depicted, but orphaned is enough for me. Sven Manguard _Talk 03:26, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tommie Frazier.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: the uploader claims there is no copyright on the image but there is no evidence the photographer surrendered his copyright even if the photo does not have a copyright notice on it and the uploaders possession does not negate the need for a proper copyright tag. ww2censor (talk) 05:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am making an effort to contact actual photographer of this photograph. I mailed a letter yesterday to the address of the magazine company - "Slam" - located in New York, New York in regard to requesting and seeking the right use this picture. From the magazine itself, I could find no information of a copyright attached to this particular photograph as I will find with all other pictures from other sources where copyright is attached and work is given credit to a specific photographer (I.E. - Sports Illustrated, Athlons, Streets & Smith). I think this is an exceptional picture of the Nebraska legend - and am working on the means to copyright tag this item. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rod hayes (talk • contribs) 11:30, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Absent source information, the assumption that the image is copyrighted. My guess is that Slam doesn't own the copyright, but is the licensee from a photo agency like Getty or AP, but it's a moot point. Mosmof (talk) 06:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Che at the beach.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan Sottolacqua (talk) 05:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with this photograph being deleted as it is, sadly, an orphan. CybergothiChé (talk) 06:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:On my way to the top.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan Sottolacqua (talk) 05:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with this photograph being deleted as it is, sadly, an orphan. CybergothiChé (talk) 06:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FOTOS TINO CANAL 6.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:09, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 08:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prabhudeva.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation (Source) Vssun (talk) 11:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per F9. Rehman⁽⁺⁾ 05:15, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beards5001.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image. PhilKnight (talk) 16:40, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; redundant. If we do keep for any reason, suggest we move to Commons. Rehman⁽⁺⁾ 05:13, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete orphaned and useless. "Ooh, I have a beard. Let's photograph it and upload it to Wikipedia." Wrong, get rid of it. Sven Manguard _Talk 04:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SG-1 True Science Wormhole.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image that could be replaced by a free alternative. Or in other words, it would be straightforward enough to create free diagram explaining the concept of a wormhole. PhilKnight (talk) 18:31, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GUNIT.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Picture shows two living people just to show they are associated. Doesn't meet WP:NFCC point 1 (replaceable) and point 8 (significance). Also invalid use per WP:NFC#UULP. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the rationale provided doesn't explain why a free alternative can't be created. PhilKnight (talk) 18:37, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tonyyayointerview.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image shows Tony Yayo and if he's dead our article doesn't say that. Non-free image of living person, invalid use of free content in most circumstances per WP:NFC#UULP. Since Mr Yayo gives interviews on MTV, we can assume that he's covered by that. Plainly replaceable. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.