Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 9

< December 8	December 10 >

December 9

File:EventDiagram.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does not appear to have any encyclopedic value. Eeekster (talk) 02:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tiers of data.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No encyclopedic value. Eeekster (talk) 02:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Omelette&fruit.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LQ, orphan. I was the original uploader but forgot it was still around. It appears not to have been used in ages, and is not likely to be of use. Jonathunder (talk) 03:13, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Swadeshabhimani RPillai.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This would appear to be a derivative work of some sort. The subject apparently died in 1916, the framing is clearly much later and the quality of the facial image suggests that it may have been taken from a book cover etc. Is it really a photograph or an artist's impression based on a photo? Sitush (talk) 07:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seal of Kerala greyscale.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Questions about copyright exist (see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seal of Kerala.jpg); discussion should take place at Commons (no need to have it here); fair use version already exists at File:Seal of Kerala fair use.svg. Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:29, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Happy Hunt lores.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdraw nomination until the Talk:Allen_Tupper_True#Three_images_in_Work_section discussion decides which image should remain on the article. (NAC) Armbrust ^{Talk to me about my edits}_review 22:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Armbrust ^{Talk to me about my edits}_review 12:37, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is an image of artwork by the artist who is the subject of the page. Removing the image would hamper the reader's ability to understand what the artist's work was like. The nomination argument is simply WP:DECORATIVE. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That rationale justifies the use of one of the artist's works. However, under the non-free content criteria, it does not justify the use of three of the artist's works. The current rationale doesn't really have a convincing argument for compliance with NFCC criterion #8. Using three images to give examples of the person's work would potentially violate NFCC 3a. Perhaps one of the three images may be kept, and the rationale can be expanded. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 22:55, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You make a very good point. I'd be uncomfortable, though, with using this discussion to decide which one to keep. That should really be decided at the page talk. Alternatively, the nominator could withdraw one of the nominations, I suppose. --Tryptofish (talk) 00:00, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But which one? I'm not qualified to make the decision, which of this pictures is the more typical work of this artist. Armbrust ^{Talk to me about my edits}_review 05:24, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Me neither. I guess the options would include: raising the question on the page talk page, raising the question there in the form of an RfC if the page has low activity, or leaving queries on the user talk pages of editors who have recently edited the page. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:36, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to withdraw all three for now, if somebody initiates the discussion. Armbrust ^{Talk to me about my edits}_review 04:22, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[1], for a start. (I don't know how many editors are paying attention, of course.) --Tryptofish (talk) 20:46, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[2], for, I hope, more eyes. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:55, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you withdraw the nominations I will initiate the talk page discussion...Modernist (talk) 21:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss here: [3]...Modernist (talk) 21:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WY Homesteaders.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdraw nomination until the Talk:Allen_Tupper_True#Three_images_in_Work_section discussion decides which image should remain on the article. (NAC) Armbrust ^{Talk to me about my edits}_review 22:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Armbrust ^{Talk to me about my edits}_review 12:38, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is an image of artwork by the artist who is the subject of the page. Removing the image would hamper the reader's ability to understand what the artist's work was like. The nomination argument is simply WP:DECORATIVE. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Airplane Travel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdraw nomination until the Talk:Allen_Tupper_True#Three_images_in_Work_section discussion decides which image should remain on the article. (NAC) Armbrust ^{Talk to me about my edits}_review 22:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Armbrust ^{Talk to me about my edits}_review 12:38, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is an image of artwork by the artist who is the subject of the page. Removing the image would hamper the reader's ability to understand what the artist's work was like. The nomination argument is simply WP:DECORATIVE. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:23, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FEquations 1,2,3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not able to find copyright licence Akavvada (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Equation 5.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not able to find copyright licence Akavvada (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Equation 4.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not able to find copyright licence Akavvada (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Definitions.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not able to find copyright licence Akavvada (talk) 16:02, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tartaric acid.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, only used in user's galley, user long gone. WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:42, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Potassium metabisulfite.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, only used in user's galley, user long gone. WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ro4-1539 structure.png + 24 others

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:59, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, some used in userspace, some with svg versions now in use, WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:52, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean, uploader long gone, as in I haven't edited in 3 days ;-) don't see anything here I'd object to deletion providing they have all been replaced by better images, I might just check to see if any particularly ugly svg's have been used to replace any of them though... Meodipt (talk) 19:58, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected that bit about the uploader, before you replied :-). If you wish to keep any then please move them to commons, or ask me to do so. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:11, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nokia C6 black.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should be possible to take a photo from Commons:Category:Nokia C6 or for someone to take a photo of the phone. MGA73 (talk) 20:07, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dideoxyadenosine meed hring.jpg + 3 others

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, uploader long gone, WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bromochlorodifluoromethane.png = 3 others

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:03, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, uploader long gone, WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:26, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hydrogen isocyanide molecular formula.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, not the normal way of displaying item, File:Hydrogen-isocyanide-2D.png has replaced it. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:33, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cimetropium-trans.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, user long gone, WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:35, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mebeverine-trans.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, user long gone, WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:35, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Milverine-trans.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, user long gone, WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:35, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 3007blog.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user photo. No encyclopedic value. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 21:34, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 3252 Hamilton 1860 p 180 long Euler.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned book scan. No encyclopedic value. As it is just a single page scan, WikiSource probably wouldn't have much use for the image either. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 22:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OperationEarlyBird.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot from a website used in describing the marketing strategy of an upcoming movie. Fails WP:NFCC#8, because the item is already adequately described in text: "a map showing all available theaters that will be screening the film's prologue", and nothing in the visual details over and above what this simple description conveys is relevant for the further discussion. Also has a nonsensical boilerplate FUR that was blindly copied from somewhere (claiming this is a "character" from a comic, which is obviously false). Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 3267 Venn example.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image. No encyclopedic value. As it is just a single page scan, Wikisource probably wouldn't have much use for the image either. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 23:30, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 3269 Couturat's Venn diagram.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image. No encyclopedic value. Image is just a simple Venn diagram. As it is just a single page scan, Wikisource probably wouldn't have much use for the image either. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 23:32, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 3373.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user photo. No encyclopedic value. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 23:40, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In use in article Camp Interlaken JCC (at least at the moment) --MGA73 (talk) 08:05, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.