Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 January 19

< Wikipedia:Files for deletion

< January 18	January 20 >

January 19

File:Newcarrara.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep for now, until the building is complete. Still not much of a discussion, but at least now with another !vote on there, I feel comfortable calling it one way or another. Image does, however, lack a proper license tag and fair use rationale and will be tagged for those problems shortly, and so it's not out of the woods yet. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Newcarrara.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mtiges (notify | contribs | uploads).

Procedural listing, file was originally tagged with {{AutoReplaceable fair use buildings}}. The uploader contested the tagging with the rationale "The image is of what the Gold Coast Stadium redevelopment will look like when the current construction process is completed. There is no equivalent replaceable photo as the stadium is currently in the process of being rebuilt from the ground up and as the current ___location is a construction site it is off limits to the public." I didn't find the rationale very convincing, so I deleted the file under F7. On my talk page, a healthy discussion regarding the deletion took place and we simply can not come to terms. So, I restored the image and decided to allow other users to view the situation and hopefully get consensus on this thing. — ξ ^xplicit 00:49, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I dont see why it cant be used as Template:Non-free fair use in but only until the building has been completed. Also needs a rationale and I would suggest should be limited to the stadium article only. If kept it should be removed from League Championship Cup (and the copy in user space) as it is only being used for decoration. MilborneOne (talk) 15:05, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

keep as per MilburneOne. What else could one use at this point of time? billinghurst sDrewth 13:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sneha-at-Anams-Store-Launch-02.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sneha-at-Anams-Store-Launch-02.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bala88 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Living Person, fair use is not applicable Kiran Gopi (talk) 03:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete No necessary for article of the person. Might have been closer if it had been to discuss the album itself. billinghurst sDrewth 13:14, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amaxus cms logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amaxus cms logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Spxdcz (notify | contribs | uploads).

unused, article was deleted at afd Terrillja _talk 04:54, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Reh man 07:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Angamoozhy04.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angamoozhy04.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SUBEESH BOSE (notify | contribs | uploads).

Formerly found at the top of an article. No encyclopedic value whatsoever. Kinu ^t/_c 05:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no educational use. Reh man 07:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete : as per Rehman DMSBel (talk) 21:07, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KORN kOVERS.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:KORN kOVERS.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jhirmer614 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Fan made cover. I is not in use and there is no info about the photo that was used to the cover. So we do not know if it is a photo taken by uploader. MGA73 (talk) 09:37, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no useful encyclopedic value, and likely derivative work based on other non-free images. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete : unencyclopedic.DMSBel (talk) 21:06, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete billinghurst sDrewth 13:15, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mortdruckerself.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. As a biography of a living person, the self-portrait fails WP:NFCC#1, and it also lacks significance per WP:NFCC#8. SchuminWeb (Talk) 12:19, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mortdruckerself.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pepso2 (notify | contribs | uploads).

This is a non-free image used in the Mort Drucker biography, which has in addition a free image File:Mort Drucker.jpg to illustrate the subject's appearance. Consequently, this image doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding of the subject. Note this was tagged as such, however I've declined the speedy and brought it here for discussion. PhilKnight (talk) 14:52, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As noted in the rationale, this illustrates the subject's self-image, not his appearance. This caricature is Mort Drucker's self-portrait. It is irreplaceable because only Drucker can draw his own self-image. A photograph or a painting or drawing by any other artist will fail in that regard. A self-caricature by a caricaturist adds to the reader's understanding of that subject. Further, one might study the subtle aspects of this self-image. As one of the leading caricaturists of the past 50 years, did Drucker draw himself with less exaggeration than that seen in his caricatures of others? This is worthy of study. Can this non-free content be replaced by a free version that has the same effect? A self-portrait cannot be replaced by the work of another artist or by a photograph. Thus, as noted in the rationale, it is irreplaceable. Pepso2 (talk) 15:42, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MediEvil Sleeping Village.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MediEvil Sleeping Village.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Robertcathles (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, possibly derivative (game diagram?). Kelly ^hi! 17:25, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Montmartre1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Montmartre1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by N.mellott (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphan, apparently was used on deleted article. Kelly ^hi! 17:29, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unused and unusable. While the assertion of PD-self is probably valid, there is no encyclopedic value for this image outside an article on the artist, which has been deleted per WP:CSD#A7. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The same also applies to this user's other uploads: File:The Riddle.jpg, File:Washington Square Arch.jpg, File:Bethesda fountain.jpg, File:Ponte milvio.jpg. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:37, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pict0423.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pict0423.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hudenson13007 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 17:33, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete billinghurst sDrewth 13:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pisay Dorm View.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pisay Dorm View.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shioan (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphan, LQ, unidentified subject. Kelly ^hi! 17:35, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, even if identifiable the quality renders it unusable. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:46, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pwf2002.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pwf2002.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jasonkrowe (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 17:38, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Slo-mother-tongue.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slo-mother-tongue.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mhus (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned graph. Kelly ^hi! 18:07, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Starleenbead.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Starleenbead.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jillannbal (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, derivative work. Kelly ^hi! 18:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sunanda Mahendra.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunanda Mahendra.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sachitramahendra (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, probably non-free. Kelly ^hi! 18:09, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Transp-VTX-web.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Transp-VTX-web.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xchoppers (notify | contribs | uploads).

Advertisement, uncertain copyright status. Kelly ^hi! 18:30, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Us senate result 2002.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Us senate result 2002.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Willhsmit (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphan, obsoleted by File:2002 Senate election map.svg Kelly ^hi! 18:42, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:West University Place Sales 2002-2007.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:West University Place Sales 2002-2007.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mpbro (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned graph. Kelly ^hi! 18:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kathleen Slater EE.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. The delete arguments were based on policy, while the keep arguments were based on the claim that the character's difference over time are essential to the understand to the article. I saw no evidence or support to these claims, so naturally, the delete arguments held more weight here. — ξ ^xplicit 00:41, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kathleen Slater EE.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gungadin (notify | contribs | uploads).

Disputed speedy. Redundant to the lead image, not at all clear why we need two images of the same character. The slight change in appearance is not important. J Milburn (talk) 20:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this file was not uploaded by me as the nominator has stated, please see User:GSorby for that. Nevertheless, the image is being used to portray the visual differences in the chasracter over the course of a decade. Infobox images get updated all the time and depicting a character in it's current representation gives it undue weight and ignores the original visual representation and the changing appearance over the course of a substantial period of time. It is not purely decorative. That the change in appearance is unimportant is subjective and many readers would disagree.GunGagdin ^Moan 21:01, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If the change in appearance is important, where are the reliable sources discussing it? J Milburn (talk) 23:55, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If the character's change in appearance is important to document, then the fair use justification needs to address that and needs to be based on reliable sources that indicate the change in appearance is encyclopedic. Otherwise, it's nothing more than an obvious it's been ten years and she's gotten older, which does not justify using two non-free images in the article. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It shows the characters differences over a long period of time and helps the reader to understand the appearances of the characters. --GSorby ^{Chat with Me!} 21:23, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Given the non-free content policy, can you show how the second image is necessary for the article? Note that helps is not the same as is necessary for; one can understand the article just fine without the second image. Again, as indicated above, if showing the aging of the character is the rationale to keep, then there needs to be sourced critical commentary specifically discussing the character's aging in the article. Otherwise, it contravenes policy (specifically, WP:NFCC bullet points 3 and 8). To make an off-hand comparison: William Shatner played James T. Kirk for the better part of thirty years. As he got older, so too did his character, obviously, and there is significantly greater difference there than between the two images shown here. However, there only needs to be (and indeed, there only is) one image of Shatner in character, as the argument that more than one image is necessary to understand an article about the character is not supported. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:01, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the change in appearance is quite minor, and not the object of sourced commentary. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WitlessAdams.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:WitlessAdams.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Aja2104 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Unused crop of File:Witless Protection0.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 21:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wwetitleattitude.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wwetitleattitude.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Socks 01 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphan, derivative work. Kelly ^hi! 21:22, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ACD.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ACD.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Downsuki (notify | contribs | uploads).

Source at Commons deleted as copyvio.[1] Kelly ^hi! 21:37, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete File originally came from http://www.flickr.com/photos/gustavosal/369212552/ and there license is All rights reserved. --MGA73 (talk) 20:27, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abdirahman ali rooble.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abdirahman ali rooble.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mohamedx (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 21:47, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ajs Nigrutin.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ajs Nigrutin.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Edesimuh (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphan, unidentified subject. Kelly ^hi! 21:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alija.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alija.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Abushahin (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphan, possibly non-free. Kelly ^hi! 22:07, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unidentifiable subject, likely a crop of possibly copyrighted image. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jzl184 2structures.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jzl184 2structures.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jzlong (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, low quality file (compression artifacts); replaced by high quality PNG file (JPG original converted into lossless PNG format). Leyo 22:40, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beanato in New York City.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beanato in New York City.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Damifb (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphan, unidentified subject. Kelly ^hi! 23:33, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, appears to be COI image used in a no-longer existing autobiographical article by an editor who has been blocked. No usefulness. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:50, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bigsky press.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bigsky press.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mggtours (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphan, probably from a deleted band article. Kelly ^hi! 23:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bill Gainer at Center for the Arts 2003.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by MGA73 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bill Gainer at Center for the Arts 2003.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wsgainer (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 23:37, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blahman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:14, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blahman.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Blahman (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 23:38, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no encyclopedic value, only use has been vandalism. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SBLNet1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SBLNet1.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sblnet (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphan file originally used on deleted article from 2006 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sblnet MilborneOne (talk) 23:42, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SBLNet2.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SBLNet2.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sblnet (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphan file originally used on deleted article from 2006 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sblnet MilborneOne (talk) 23:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_January_19&oldid=1138517533"