| < January 20 | January 22 > |
|---|
January 21
edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:J-20-1st-flight.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Terra Novus (notify | contribs | uploads).
- This is a settled matter. I saw a similar photos on this files for deletion page that have been declared non-free use. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion#January_16 , also http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_January_6&diff=prev&oldid=407584837 Madrid 2020 (talk) 19:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it has a Copyright FUR, therefore it is non-free use. It is not tagged as free, it is tagged as copyrighted. So what is your rationale for deletion? 184.144.170.159 (talk) 06:09, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, per timing of the concurrent di-replaceable tagging. Like with other fighter jets, free images will be possible, at least once the plane begins to appear at flight shows, parades and similar events. If somebody was able to take this photo, somebody else will be able to take another. The argument expressed in the "disputed" tag, that it is unreplaceable because it shows the unrepeatable moment of its historically first flight, is obviously bogus: we use the photograph to show what the plane looks like, and it will look exactly the same on later flights. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete This matter has been settled. The last image used also had NFU tag and was deleted for the reason that just because you can't easily find a free version on the internet doesn't mean you can't find one. Dozens, maybe hundreds, of photographs have been taken of the plane. Editors can contact the copyright holders and ask their permission to host the picture in the normal way or continue looking. At some point a free version will become easily accessible, even if it's hard to find one now. John Smith's (talk) 10:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:15, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jordan poses 08.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jl6822a (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused photo of this guy. —Bkell (talk) 03:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; also tagged for WP:CSD#G3, as the only purpose of this image appears to have been vandalism, but no objection to allowing this FfD to take its course. --Kinu t/c 23:28, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WildDances-NYE.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Luigi-ish (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Fails WP:NFCC#3 as multiple non-free files are being used when one would suffice. This alternate cover is not significantly different from the main cover to justify its use. — ξxplicit 06:40, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Too similar to main cover. A description of the cover already exists in the text ("The Christmas Edition has festive design"), and there is no critical commentary about the image or anything indicating the image is necessary for understanding the article (although the text about the description could use some stylistic improvement). --Kinu t/c 23:35, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Parks and recreation go big or go home.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hunter Kahn (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Yet another non-free screenshot from a TV episode. Purely decorative infobox use; random, nondescript scene, not embedded in analytical commentary, not required for understanding anything in the article. Fails NFCC8, as so often. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:47, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (see below)
Comment- I added this image, but don't oppose it getting removed. I plan on expanding this article over the next few days, and if I find there is something from that new content that calls for an image based on analytical commentary and helpful to reader understanding, I may add that instead. — Hunter Kahn 14:32, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] - Delete, no critical commentary, no evidence that image is necessary per WP:NFCC. --Kinu t/c 23:24, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment After finishing the article, I've found that this image is much more appropriate and useful, as (unlike the original picture) it addresses an area of critical commentary in the article. I've thus changed my vote above for this image to delete. — Hunter Kahn 06:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sanjay suri.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zoya677 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Likely copyright violation; possibly from [1]. The image uploaded here is larger (564 × 812) than the image on that page, but if you view the image here at full resolution you'll see that it is pixelated, which seems to indicate that it has been resized up from a smaller version. —Bkell (talk) 12:13, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, self licensing tags are dubiousl appears to be copyvio/derivative of image provided, and thus replaceable in BLP article on subject and thus unusable per WP:NFCC criterion 1. --Kinu t/c 23:37, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MortShuman.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Paradise coyote (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Way too small regardless of use. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pak lah tidur.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sturmabeislung (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused, unencyclopedic, unlikely to be uploader's own work. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:08, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.