Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 July 16

< July 15	July 17 >

July 16

File:Aaronrisingtide.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:13, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional image of some sort. Used in a now deleted PROD. Likely copyrighted, judging by the watermark. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:49, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Selena Gomez - Love You Like a Love Song (musicvideo).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unambiguous WP:NFCC failure. As three separate images sandwiched together, it fails all tests for "minimal use": it's the equivalent of placing three separate images into the article. It also fails WP:NFCC#8: it conveys nothing to the reader that cannot be conveyed with text. —Kww(talk) 01:34, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OutsourcedCast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The non-free image File:Outsourced-TVseries.jpg already identifies the show's cast, and a second image is not needed. –Dream out loud (talk) 06:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:My Photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userphoto of a user who only ever edited eight times, 4 years ago. Only used on their userpage. Acather96 (talk) 07:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. No reason to go deleting people's userpages. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:48, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC02762.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:49, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Charli.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:49, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BW21(powderblue).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ffffffkjk.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unenctclopedic - logo for non-existent WikiProject. Acather96 (talk) 10:41, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WWxbox.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:42, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WP logo (2).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:43, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Northeastpower.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:47, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aaaaaaaaaaa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 11:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Presidencia de Tepatitlan durante las Fiestas Patrias.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:10, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Martin H. tagged this as a copyvio of a Flickr image. The images are different in color, as the Flickr image is so dark that I doubt that this one could have been produced from it (e.g. the inside of the "o" on the building on the far high left is distinguishable, while on Flickr the inside looks identical to the outside), but there are so many other similarities that I'm uncomfortable declining and leaving it alone. Opinions, please, on whether this is more likely to be a Photoshopped version of the original or simply a different-but-similar photo of the same subject? Please don't speedy delete as copyvio, since I've just declined it, and please note that there are no other problems with this image: there's no reason to delete it if it can be established as different from the Flickr image. Nyttend (talk) 11:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the television antennas, which provide a good reference for the angle of the shot. Judging from the angles and positions, the two photos were taken from precisely the same spot. Since there isn't a zoom version available, I have to assume this is a crop.—Kww(talk) 11:40, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look at any individual leaf of the trees. This file is just cropped out and changed a little bit in color, but that does not make our uploaded the author or gives him the full copyright. The same applies to the other uploads, a PUF for File:Parroquia de San Francisco de Asis en Tepatitlan.jpg should follow or included here. The uploader simply not got yet what "author" or "entirely own work" means. --Martin H. (talk) 01:28, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Riasat Ali Gudgor.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is no private photo album, this file doesn't have any educational use. — Bill william compton^Talk 13:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unencyclopedic. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:12, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jessica Lunsford.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citing precedent set at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 July 8#File:Caylee anthony.jpg, it is not necessary to show a non-free photo of the victim to understand the content of the article, per WP:NFCC#8. If this were a free photo, it would be perfectly fine to include a photo of the victim. However, since it is non-free, it must meet all ten non-free content criteria, and it would appear to fail one of them. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Autorouteexitsign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, essentially obsoleted by File:CH-Hinweissignal-Ende der Autobahn.svg on Commons. Kelly ^hi! 17:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons it's a photo of a real sign. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 06:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Autorouteentrancesign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, essentially obsoleted by File:CH-Hinweissignal-Autobahn.svg on Commons. Kelly ^hi! 17:56, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Move to commons it's a photo of a real sign. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 06:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ethnic Groups And Languages.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've tagged this dubious image file as a useless file due to the incoherent description with no applicable explanation whatsoever and is not linked to any existing article pages. Also, it was uploaded by an indefinitely blocked disruptive user/sockpuppeteer → LS C HIST (talk · contribs). --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 20:43, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Orphaned, and not useful due to no explanation as to what exactly it's supposed to be illustrating. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:10, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and burn with fire per above. Since this user is blocked. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 06:27, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Obscure as no description is provided. — Bill william compton^Talk 11:35, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Xbandscore.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:09, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does not illustrate anything in the article; use is unnecessary. Danger (talk) 21:38, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Also no fair use rationale, so we currently must delete it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Serves no purpose, also possibly copyrighted. — Bill william compton^Talk 04:29, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 06:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.