Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 June 28

< June 27	June 29 >

June 28

File:Espaillat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, a coat of arms that is either non-notable or a copyvio B (talk) 01:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:05, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:San Juan de la Maguana.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, a coat of arms that is either non-notable or a copyvio B (talk) 01:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:239-3909 windowworld IMG.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use B (talk) 01:56, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cronkiteschoollogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, current version is File:Cronkiteschool.jpg, wrong format anyway B (talk) 01:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I think we could use this to illustrate the former logo of the school. Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 02:11, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per Kiteinthewind. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:08, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wiki-Cats.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned from deleted article. Kelly ^hi! 06:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wiki-Chels.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned from deleted article. Kelly ^hi! 06:52, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rail-duck-western-engine.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 06:53, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Could be used on Thomas the Tank Engine or something. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sl2-m3-300.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low-quality picture. Kelly ^hi! 07:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lead Belly publicity shot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:31, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no evidence that copyright was not renewed Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:02, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The photograph is a publicity shot from the 1920s. Therefore, I'm fairly certain that the photograph is now in the public ___domain.Hoops gza (talk) 18:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep pending proof otherwise, as publicity shots didn't regularly carry copyright notices at this time. Also, this should be kept for fair use regardless, so it probably should have been listed at WP:PUF. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01619.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Useless picture of someone called 'Harris Hedge', orphaned and unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 16:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom, and file name is against rules too. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:12, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daniel Mercado Molina AKA Tianguis (selfportrait).JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image of a user who's only edit was the upload of this file 5 years ago. Unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 16:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01657.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry photo of someone with no apparent encyclopedic value, possible copyright problem as the description reads 'Private stock'. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 16:41, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom, and the file name is against rules too. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:12, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01664.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bad quality makes this unencyclopedic, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 16:45, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom, and the file name is against rules too. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:13, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01675.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a holiday photo, no apparent encyclopedic value (no desc.). Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 16:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom, and the file name is against rules too. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dahi puri.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry photo with content near-indistinguishable. A perfectly good image of the same thing is already available at File:Dahi Puri.JPG. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 17:32, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01656.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR,subject(s) not identified, no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spartacusmap.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low-quality unused map Skier Dude (talk) 19:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:3c.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-encyclopedic unused image. I can't even recognize what this image is showing. Fleet Command (talk) 20:58, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom. I think it's a train or something. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:16, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Babar Iqbal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, possible hoax Acather96 (talk) 21:12, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom. Rcsprinter (talk) 20:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pirate Party of Canada.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to File:Pirate Party of Canada signet.svg, which is of higher quality, albeit of a different format. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:43, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete under WP:CFSD#G7, WP:CFSD#F5, and WP:CFSD#F8 (I didn't think this had to be opened to discussion). The discussion for Commons inclusion can be found at commons:Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2011-06#File:Pirate Party of Canada signet.svg. 117Avenue (talk) 23:53, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not F5, as it is free, and it is not F8, as it's a different file format.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:09, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was non-free when I uploaded it. 117Avenue (talk) 00:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rickdankolastwaltzstill.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CV. The file was uploaded because no free images of Rick Danko could be found. Since then, a number of free images have been found and added to the article. - tSR - Nth Man (talk) 00:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.