Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 March 2

< March 1	March 3 >

March 2

File:ZubirSaid-YusofIshak-SijilKemuliaan-19630316.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary non-free image: We don't need to see an image of a guy receiving a certificate of honour to understand that the guy received the certificate of honour. Damiens.rf 03:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd forgotten that I uploaded this image. I was not very familiar with image use policies then. I have no objections to it being deleted for the reasons stated. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 04:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ben daniels cuttingit.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decorative non-free headshot of a character. Damiens.rf 03:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Definitely fails the policy. As this is nothing more than a very small frame grab/head shot of a living person it fails for its use in the Ben Daniels article via number 1: No free equivalent. As there is no critical commentary for it's use in the Cutting It article (And that is already using File:Cutting.gif) it fails number 8 - Contextual significance. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NFCC#8 for both articles, replaceable for both articles as well. Swarm ^X 02:28, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ResurgamIIbanner.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not used. Not useful. Damiens.rf 03:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daryl hayott webcast.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daryl hayott webcast 2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Daryl hayott webcast 3.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Daryl hayott webcast 4.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

I want to stress that this nom is not about the images themselves but rather the fact they are all uploaded by a publicist for the label *and* they all contain the labels logo. As such they come off a bit spammy. As an option: they are all free of copyright they can all be re-purposed if anyone wanted to take the time to do that. Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all Took a decent head photo from the first image, don't see any further use for them. They do come off as spammy. Swarm ^X 02:56, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag of the Peoples Republic of Australia.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural nomination on behalf of Crusoe8181 (talk · contribs), who prodded this file with the rationale "a ridiculous and offensive parody which is not used in any articles". Since files cannot be prodded I am bringing it here.

You're sure as hell you haven't a sense of humour and you really need a life. Do you constantly troll around Wikipedia waving your little "delete stick" like you are some sort of deputy sheriff. I am sure that you will come back sprouting out various of Wikipedia rules and regulations but guess what, Wikipedia will never be an authoritative text that can be used a proper research. What are you going to do next... delete my user account for having a sense of humour that doesn't play your little games. --Throttler (talk) 23:02, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For my part, I am neutral. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:52, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:MYSPACE ("Please upload only files that are used (or will be used) in encyclopedia articles or project pages; anything else will be deleted.") Swarm ^X 01:14, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There you go...I rest my case. --Throttler (talk) 06:01, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Boisepre2006entrance.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Author admits that image was a copyrighted image that isn't his own. G7 declined for no particular reason. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 17:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as a blatant copvio: There was no good reason for not deleting that image. How much more obvious could this conversation be:

Question: is this picture indeed your work

Answer: It's not, I never realized I uploaded it claiming it was mine.

Reply: You can tag it for {{db-author}} then

Reason for the decline: Tagger isn't the copyright holder, and anyway this has been here long enough that it shouldn't be G7 deleted

One of the more bogus reasons for declining a speedy. Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A New Day in the Old Town.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free TV episode screenshot. Shows a stunt scene in which a character is ejected through her car's windscreen in a car accident. FUR correctly explains how that event is a key element in the plot. But the image is not needed to understand the element. Nothing in the visual detail of the event, rather than the sheer fact of the event, is crucial to understanding the article. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. I'll have to find something that better illustrates the episode. Feel free to delete :/ Ruby2010 talk 18:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kantportrait.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, banned uploader. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 18:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if the wersion here is better that this one: File:Immanuel Kant (portrait).jpg. If yes we should move to Commons - if no we should just delete. --MGA73 (talk) 22:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's scaled down with slightly different color. --B (talk) 03:53, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jawad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File was deleted on Commons (Commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Jawad.jpg) and uploader has been blocked on enwiki. So perhaps we should delete here too. MGA73 (talk) 22:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.