Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 March 4

< March 3	March 5 >

March 4

File:DalrympleWilliam20070629.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source unclear. OTRS confirmation required. Vssun (talk) 05:36, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~How does one get an OTRS confirmation?--PremKudva^Talk 05:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)~~[reply]

Hang on I have asked copyright holder to send permission details as per WP:OTRS.--PremKudva^Talk 04:59, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This file is relisted in order to extend the process long enough to get a confirmation on the request put in at OTRS so that we can make educated comments following confirmation. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note that copy right holder had sent OTRS e-mail on 26 February to commons@wikimedia.org instead of permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Requested holder to send to the correct address.--PremKudva^Talk 04:13, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tianamen protests 1989.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Has fair-use tag, but no fair-use rationale template. There are existing non-free fair-use images of the 1989 protests on Wikipedia; why do we need another one? Wikipedia is not an image gallery. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 10:02, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with you. There is only one-related photo on the protests article, so adding more photos to illustrate the protests is needed. -- from Andyso^{(talk page)} 11:17, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Loksabha.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free photograph of the interior of the parliament of India (Lok Sabha). Uploader claims irreplaceability because photography is not freely permitted [1]. However, it appears [2] that photography from the visitors galleries may well be possible, albeit only with special permission. As long as there is no evidence that such permission is never given, we must assume free replacements are possible in principle. (A total ban on photography would be rather surprising, since press reports and TV recordings of parliament sessions are routinely published.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ingrid-Bucholtz Halle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:11, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic and Privately owned image and not wished to be publicly distributed Nickyip a55 (talk) 13:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's not quite clear to me what you mean. You just uploaded this image yourself a few minutes ago. Did you upload it in error, regarding its copyright status, or what else made you change your mind? Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wordplay Game Board.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary in-game screenshot of a game show. This image could be replaced by a free mock-up of the layout (with our own words inserted). RJaguar3 | u | t 18:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Whew gameshow.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. A shame, too, because that is the one and only late but great Randy Amasia right there. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:22, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In-show screenshot of a game show. The pertinent details about the game play could be replaced with a free screenshot or table representation of the game board of a hypothetical game. RJaguar3 | u | t 19:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—Unnecessary to describe gameplay. Sottolacqua (talk) 19:10, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bearatross.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 21:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Definitely a new species. Reh man 11:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pikeplacemarketlowellssign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete Zsinj^Talk 14:30, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned sign image. Kelly ^hi! 21:44, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no forseeable use. Reh man 11:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SHJmainpage.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete Zsinj^Talk 14:31, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned Wikipedia screenshot. Kelly ^hi! 22:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.