Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 October 12

< October 11	October 13 >

October 12

File:Canada Current Parliament.SVG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value. I'm not sure exactly what this image is representing, given that File:Canada 2006 Federal Election seats.svg is in the article as the composition immediately after the 2006 elections (and is different). if this is from some other time in 2006, the exact date should be specified. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:37, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CaliforniaCrimeIndex.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, removed from article based on original research/POV concerns: Talk:Three_strikes_law#Misleading_Crime_Rates_Graph_.28POV.29 Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Central Toronto (39th Parl).PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, does not seem to be useful. used to be used in a navbox and/or draft navbox.[1]. appears to be a somewhat arbitrary grouping of districts as of an unclear date. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:01, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:St04.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, does not seem to be useful. used to be used in a navbox and/or draft navbox.[2]. appears to be a somewhat arbitrary grouping of districts as of an unclear date. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:01, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:My Family Wiki.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:37, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DPPT 067.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no description or target article Skier Dude (talk) 05:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dpmsamtg.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no description or target article Skier Dude (talk) 05:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HAOMAN 17 Jerusalem(1).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, low quality, no foreseeable encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 05:25, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Haoman(2).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, low quality, no foreseeable encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 05:25, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MeronLagBaomer2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR, UE, no target article or encyc use foreseen Skier Dude (talk) 05:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JagjitSinghYoung.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We have a freely licensed image of Singh, so a non-free image fails WP:NFCC#1. The file also lacks a valid non-free-use rationale. Hekerui (talk) 07:43, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hart County High School, Hartwell, GA logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Claim of copyright ownership is incorrect. Possibally non-free logo, used only in the userspace of a long inactive user. Sven Manguard Wha? 09:14, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dublin's General Post office.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unusably bad quality. (Usurpation in the middle has no copyright or source information, so cannot be saved) Sven Manguard Wha? 10:20, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we have better images.[3] Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:29, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Solomon Grundy (Justice League Unlimited).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not particularly different from the main infobox art, therefore I contend that it fails NFCC 3a. May also fail NFCC 8. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Solomon Grundy (The Batman).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not particularly different from the main infobox art, therefore I contend that it fails NFCC 3a. May also fail NFCC 8. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AgResearch logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A non-free logo, obsoleted by File:AgResearch.svg +mt 11:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I am the uploader of the orig. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 18:30, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:House Of Flora logo.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned logo. I personally would contest the PD-text tag here, so this is quite possibally an orphaned non-free image. Sven Manguard Wha? 11:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently superseded by File:House Of Flora logo 2.JPG. Mangoe (talk) 21:19, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ZebraTourLogoemail.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. —Bkell (talk) 11:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Portico, National Gallery London.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, bad title, description is "This is my village". Where is this? Users two contributions shed no light. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:40, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep? This is the National Gallery, London. It's a good image, but I'm a little confused about where it came from. Based on the user's edits to the sandbox, it looks like he's probably from Sindh. Which would make it somewhat unusual that he uploaded photo of London (and labeled it "my village"). But the EXIF data is there, and it's high-res, so I'm guessing self-taken. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:25, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The file was moved from File:Img 0673 gs.jpg to File:Portico, National Gallery London.jpg by Cloudbound (talk · contribs) at 19:00, 15 October 2011 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and move to Commons. TinEye finds a few matches, but examination of the clouds in the background shows they are different photos taken from the same angle. PleaseStand (talk) 22:14, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0692.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, bad title, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 12:46, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0756.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, bad title, no description, unidentified people, bad pic – Quadell ^(talk) 12:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0775.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, bad title, partial duplication of copyrighted content – Quadell ^(talk) 12:55, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0824.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, bad title, no description, probable duplication of copyrighted content – Quadell ^(talk) 12:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Archer Freestyle Marked Fita Field.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete - replaced by Archer Freestyle Marked Fita Field cropped.jpg Mr Barndoor 12:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0839c.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of text, probable copyvio. (Also bad title, not used in any articles) – Quadell ^(talk) 13:02, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 087332.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, bad title, description is "Shot with my camera", random people, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 13:05, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete along with the user's other uploads as attack pages. Note that another of the user's uploads was used as part of vandalism, and yet another has a disparaging description. PleaseStand (talk) 22:41, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Those other two uploads are now deleted; however, it is obvious that this image likely never had any encyclopedic purpose. PleaseStand (talk) 23:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0850.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bad title, orphan, random person, not needed – Quadell ^(talk) 13:08, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0865.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a sculpture by Fritz Røed (1928-2002), and therefore this photo is a derivative of a non-free work. (Freedom of Panorama in Norway covers only buildings.) – Quadell ^(talk) 13:11, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently supposed to be used for Sverd i fjell to replace another image which was moved to Commons and then deleted as incorrectly tagged. I've recreated the missing file File:Sverd-i-fjell.jpg as a much lower resolution version of this file. Mangoe (talk) 20:20, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That looks perfect. – Quadell ^(talk) 14:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wikipedia images 006.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not good quality for a generic pencil image Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:34, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wikipedia images 013.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not good quality for a generic calculator image Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:35, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wikipedia images 005.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, not good quality for generic marker image Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:35, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pete-of-apes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, probably is a derivative work of a copyrighted image Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:36, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Saadatawantabla1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, permission unclear. uploaded by someone with the same username as the person pictured in the file (a musician), but credited to someone else. low-res, border makes me think it's downloaded from the web. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MA-2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:09, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by Massachusetts Route 2.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think you intended to refer to File:Massachusetts Route 2.png. Since the two images are different -- MA-2.png shows the road on the overlay of a map of counties and Massachusetts Route 2.png shows it on a state highway map, I'm not convinced that the new version makes the old one totally unnecessary. Also, I see that MA-2.png has been tagged for transfer to Commons for more than one month. Wouldn't it make sense to let it go to Commons and then delete it? --Orlady (talk) 17:00, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2010 United States Senate elections.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:2010 Senate election results map.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:40, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Puyo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:41, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Turkey Districts.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, says it's a revision of File:Turkey districts.png, but considering that one is the one that's in the article, i'm not sure whether the revisions were an improvement Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0961.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, bad title, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 17:17, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0962.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, bad title, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 17:17, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 1036.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, bad title, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 17:26, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 1048.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, bad title, random person, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 17:27, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 1206.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Commons. It is now located at File:Glines Canyon Dam.jpg. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, no description, bad title, very poor contrast, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 17:36, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and move to commons Not a great image, but we don't have many images of the Glines Canyon Dam. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:14, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Img 1209 vc5 450x360.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete as unambiguous copyright violation. Blurpeace 18:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged GFDL, but the uploader says "I found it on Lime wire downloading images" – Quadell ^(talk) 17:37, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Also, an orphan). – Quadell ^(talk) 17:37, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 1361.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, bad title, no description, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 17:46, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 1376.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, bad title, no description, some people, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 17:47, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Davethomas.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Way too small to be of use. I can't even see the damn thing. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not in line with site non-free content criteria anyway. Blurpeace 18:23, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree it's too small to be of much educational value, but the guy is deceased so I'm not sure why the file doesn't meet the NFCC. /ƒETCH COMMS / 03:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can't be used in the lead unless there are extenuating circumstances. Blurpeace 20:37, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tearsofgriefbayonne.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, licensing cleaned up. Blurpeace 20:56, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in the United States, and I could find no clear indication that the rights to the work have been formally released. Blurpeace 18:20, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the licensing and rationale and reduced the usage of the image as best I could. Mangoe (talk) 21:16, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It also needs to be at a reduced resolution. /ƒETCH COMMS / 03:51, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've been trying to do that but for some reason the software keeps returning the largest size version. Mangoe (talk) 13:43, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unknown Beetle 2007.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image, too fuzzy for reliable identification. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:23, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete must be the worst photo of an insect I have ever seen. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:15, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.