Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 October 14

< October 13	October 15 >

October 14

File:Northwest University logo .jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, superseded by File:Northwest university transparent logo.png. — ξ ^xplicit 00:44, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Useless media --Sreejith K (talk) 07:30, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The file was moved from File:NU.jpg to File:Northwest University logo .jpg by Cloudbound (talk · contribs) at 19:07, 15 October 2011 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GJ-Freddy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file with little encyclopedic value. Gobonobo ^T ^C 01:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)* Note: The file was moved from File:GJ.jpg to File:GJ-Freddy.jpg by Cloudbound (talk · contribs) at 18:57, 15 October 2011 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pomfret-angolan-baby-girl-320.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed this from the article it was in, about the town. Does not add anything of encyclopedic value to the article, can't really be used elsewhere. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:53, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PictureNamassudra.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality, can be reproduced using text. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:58, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picturepup7.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unidentified breed, intrusive watermark. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:03, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I didn't find this specific picture, but the watermark makes it clear that this is the work of Madeleine Biancon. No evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. -- Whpq (talk) 17:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alveywater.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. I would have otherwise moved the image to Commons if not for the significant concern about the license. I have no reason to think we're actually clear to use this photo, either locally or on Commons. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:55, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unidentified breed Sven Manguard Wha? 05:03, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and move to commons. reasonably high-quality dog photo, even if breed is unknown. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:33, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree this is a great photo, and might be useful for illustration purposes if it were free, but it's not clear that the photo is free. See my remarks for File:Picturepup7.jpg, and File:Picturenancy5.jpg. The style of the photo is similar to the others from Madeleine Biancon, and also uploaded by the same editor. -- Whpq (talk) 17:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Whpq makes a good case, and I think ~~it would be more difficult to identify the breed~~ than to simply create a new, free, image. --Tryptofish (talk) 15:23, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to commons. Breed is almost definitely a Koolie. I did a reverse image search and scoured Madeleine Biancon's site and didn't find any matches. Gobonobo ^T ^C 05:23, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I have severe reservations about keeping this image due to the copyright status of this image because WP:DUCK. We have two other very clearly identified images which belong to Madeleine Biancon that have been uploaded without evidence of permission. Why do we think the uploader told the truth for this image? -- Whpq (talk) 17:33, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picturenancy5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unidentified breed, intrusive watermark. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:03, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The uploader asserts they are the copyright holder but without proof. The watermark lead me to this page which indicates that the image is copyright by Madeleine Biancon. -- Whpq (talk) 17:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Whpq. Gobonobo ^T ^C 05:24, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pictureofme.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personal image of inactive user. No encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PictureofMark.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. "Mark" is not otherwise identified. Uploader is long gone. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:13, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PictureofDrHeptinstallRGS Drh.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. Dr Heptinstall's article is already illustrated with larger, color images. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pictureframe.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. Appears to be an advertisement. No apparent encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:21, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picturedigi 008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unusably low quality. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:22, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Atascocita High School front.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Generic name and has no details on the page to identify the building. This image without any useful information is impossible to be put to use. Sreejith K (talk) 07:28, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep now identified. To nominator: please look at user contribs before nominating for deletion on the grounds that an image is unidentifiable. Usually the uploader's contributions will show what the image is of. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The file was moved from File:AHS front.jpg to File:Atascocita High School front.jpg by Sreejithk2000 (talk · contribs) at 18:08, 14 October 2011 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:08, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Copycoder panel decoding some copycoded text.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article about Copycoder was deleted. This image does not really provide any information about Copycoder Sreejith K (talk) 07:35, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AhRPathway.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a screenshot. Also, the page has little information to put this media to use. Sreejith K (talk) 07:37, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Clearly intended to replace File:AhRSignaling_colour.png at Aryl hydrocarbon receptor, the former having a dubious copyright status, claiming to be reprinted with permission and copyrighted on the the article page, yet also marked as self-made on the file page. — trlkly 18:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ahsan-mumbai-architects-new-delhi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image. Subject does not have an article here, so might not be a useful image. Sreejith K (talk) 07:38, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Augusta High School 1923WWing&1926gym.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No valid information for the image in the image page. Cannot be put to use. Sreejith K (talk) 13:26, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep not the best image ever, but now identified. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:16, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The file was moved from File:AHS1923WWing&1926gym.jpg to File:Augusta High School 1923WWing&1926gym.jpg by Sreejithk2000 (talk · contribs) at 18:10, 14 October 2011 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AHSBand1986AHSStor1999.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Random click + No useful information in the page. No possible use. Sreejith K (talk) 13:35, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete also Augusta High School (Kentucky), but not a useful photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:16, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ai team thumb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low resolution image. Possibly web copyright infringement Sreejith K (talk) 13:48, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 1994.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reproduction of copyrighted statue, derivative work. "Freedom of Panorama" does not apply to sculptures in the U.S. – Quadell ^(talk) 18:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 2017 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, bad title, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 18:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, we have better toolbar images – Quadell ^(talk) 18:53, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, bad title, random person, unsure copyright status – Quadell ^(talk) 18:54, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image02619.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, bad title, blurry image, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 18:55, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image013.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, bad title, bad sketch, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 18:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image017.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, bad title, mostly text, odd original research – Quadell ^(talk) 18:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image02424.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, bad title, no description, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 18:57, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image02521.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, bad title, no description, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 18:57, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image02717.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, bad title, no description, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 18:57, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image028.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, bad title, no description, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 18:57, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image136.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, bad title, no description, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 18:58, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image143VADIM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, non-notable musician – Quadell ^(talk) 18:58, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image158 La Vita E Una Fontana at De Anza College.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A photo of a copyrighted sculpture is a derivative work. "Freedom of Panorama" does not cover sculptures in the U.S. – Quadell ^(talk) 19:00, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image1CamilleDavila.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 19:00, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image161 Longevity Turtle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A photo of a copyrighted sculpture is a derivative work. "Freedom of Panorama" does not cover sculptures in the U.S. – Quadell ^(talk) 19:00, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image163 Time Graffiti.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A photo of a copyrighted sculpture is a derivative work. "Freedom of Panorama" does not cover sculptures in the U.S. – Quadell ^(talk) 19:01, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sculpture on the C2C cycle route at Rowrah.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A photo of a copyrighted sculpture is a derivative work. "Freedom of Panorama" does not cover sculptures in the U.S. – Quadell ^(talk) 19:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This sculpture is not in the U.S. - it's near Rowrah, England. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:33, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oops! You're right, and UK law allows photography like this. Keep. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:43, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sculpture in Akureyri.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete - photo is on Commons, where further discussion should take place. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A photo of a copyrighted sculpture is a derivative work. "Freedom of Panorama" does not cover sculptures in Iceland – Quadell ^(talk) 19:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chavez at military school.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary decorative non-free image. We don't need to see an young Hugo Chavez to read and understand about his early years. damiens.rf 19:38, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hugo Chávez (1992 Coup Surrender).jpg

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 December 1.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary decorative non-free image. We don't need to a headshot still of tv coverage of some event to read about and understand that event. The image of a man talking to microphones is too trivial to justify the use of non-free content on the text about the event. damiens.rf 19:39, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Kelly ^hi! 19:46, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep image depicting one of the most significant political events in recent Venezuelan history. Impossible to reproduce.Caracas1830 (talk)
  - WP:ITSHISTORIC (2nd example). --damiens.rf 15:20, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'd be hard pressed to make a case that the file could pass NFCC#8. (Hey damiens, thanks for quoting Historic!) --Tryptofish (talk) 15:27, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just a generic guy at a mic. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:13, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article's text directly describes the event that this still illustrates as well as the national television broadcast itself. No free equivalent could reasonably be obtained or created to replace this image. As far as NFCC#8, the image contains a wealth of information not described in the text, illustrating what Chávez looked like during the ordeal and the fact that he did indeed wear his uniform for the broadcast (as per his insistence). Further, the broadcast itself brought a hitherto unknown Chávez national notoriety and as such was pivotal in Venezuelan history. Gobonobo ^T ^C 05:07, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Who needs to see an image to get the point that the man wore his uniform at the event? And why do we need to know what exactly looked like at the time? He was not much different from his look on the free images and, nevertheless, his look played no role in the events. It was not a fashion parade. --damiens.rf 10:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pyramid Tea Bag.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable by image that doesn't incorporate copyrighted product packaging. Kelly ^hi! 23:11, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:El Rey.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. This image is the uploader's sole contribution. — ξ ^xplicit 23:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.