Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 October 22

< October 21	October 23 >

October 22

File:Rayleigh criterion.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, last version replaceable with math template Skier Dude (talk) 00:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mark and Emily.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned user image; no other encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 00:27, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sheepshagger.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR, LQ, no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 00:27, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sam ewing2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:51, 1 November 2011 (UTC)delete - based off the deleted contributions of the user in question, it's pretty obvoiusly not the same Sam Ewing. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:07, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned .possible user pic, no target article given Skier Dude (talk) 02:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In case it is Sam Ewing. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:38, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KojiDude's dog Bailey.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned pic of user's pet, no other encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 02:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mets501TalkHeader.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:51, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned user's talk page header Skier Dude (talk) 02:33, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what the nominator means by saying that this file is orphaned. Doesn't it still appear at the top of User talk:Mets501? Newyorkbrad (talk) 20:08, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No Brad, the image you see at the top of User talk:Mets501 is File:Mets501TalkHeader.gif, not quite the same as the file nominated here. --RexxS (talk) 01:24, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Okay, fair enough. Nonetheless, I don't see much value to deleting this file simply because it has been superseded by a similar one, without at least discussing with the user. Mets501, although less active right now, has been an editor for six years (and an administrator since 2006); I don't think it's especially productive to start deleting harmless things from his userspace without talking to him first. (Note, I noticed this file from the notification on Mets501's talkpage, the same comment pertains to any other nominations in the same classification. I understand the rationale for this kind of nomination, but I would think it a little off-putting if I were away from Wiki for awhile, and I came back and the first thing I saw was a deletion nomination of something in my userspace.) Keep. Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:37, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Indeed. I agree 100% with your reasoning, Brad. The need to continually clean out unused or useless material is understandable on a project like ours, but it's a microscopic gain in resources compared to the potential offence that may be caused to long-standing editors. I'm afraid that Jimbo and the WMF may have made a fatal mistake in assuming that good editors are so easily replaceable that we can afford to ignore the consequences of discouraging our established contributors. --RexxS (talk) 02:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Any reason this stuff can't simply be moved out to Commons?~~ Ah, I see - it's orphaned and used nowhere. Even the creator doesn't want it anymore, else it would be used. I don't get the rationale for keeping...an absent user might be offended that we deleted something they didn't want? Kelly ^hi! 02:14, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're making a connection between "unused" and "unwanted" that isn't always true. Some editors (Giano is an obvious example) may produce an image that they intend to use later, and such an image may languish unused for a considerable time, but those images are by no means unwanted. After all, we all know that there is no deadline. You really need to establish whether the user intends to use the image at some point in the future and not take that decision out of their hands. An absent user might indeed be offended that we deleted something just because they didn't use it right away. There's no rush - just ask Mets501 if they want the image any longer, and respect their answer. In the meantime, Keep. --RexxS (talk) 02:31, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, at some point this gets a little silly. The user has edited his talk page to use Image:Mets501TalkHeader.gif instead of this one. It is virtually identical, personally I can't tell the difference. I'm sure that, if/when the user returns and wants the png version, he has this image saved on his computer somewhere. Alternatively, one of his friends could save it on his/her computer, or even place it a social networking site like Flickr. In the meantime, others maintain the File namespace and are trying to get rid of unused dross that nobody wants. Kelly ^hi! 03:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it does get a little silly. What I'm failing to understand is why the folks maintaining the File namespace - and there's no doubt in my mind that they do a terrific job - are in such a hurry that they can't wait until Mets501 has a chance to tell us whether it's wanted or not. As I said above, it's not conducive to maintaining good relations with our established contributors, and with all due respect it's neither your place nor mine to second-guess other editors' intentions. I'm equally sure that Mets501 will come back, spot this discussion, and sort out the file themself. There really isn't any need for anything more than drawing their attention to the file, as there is no reason to suppose that an editor of six years standing with five years tenure as an admin is unable or unwilling to deal with this issue. --RexxS (talk) 14:28, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure nobody would object to the file being undeleted should Mets return and decide that it is wanted after all. Kelly ^hi! 18:49, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm certain you're right about that, Kelly. Which only leaves the issue that Brad raised (and I agreed with) that it's the sort of thing that has the potential to cause ill-feeling, and I'm only asking that you balance that against your obvious desire to get this bit of tidying done. I know I'd prefer to err on the side of not offending long-term contributors when there is a viable alternative; naturally, I can respect your stance if you chose differently. --RexxS (talk) 21:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's freely licensed, so, in short, WP:COBWEB. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:09, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, even that essay says the image needs to have some encyclopedic use. Kelly ^hi! 18:46, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know (I wrote it!). In this case, I think there is a usefulness to the aims of the project, at least, but I wouldn't want to belabor the point. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:32, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think the tidying outweighs the theoretical concern that he might want it someday. There is no need to keep every random unused userpage header, userphoto, etc, just in the off chance that a retired user might come back and decide he wants it. On the other hand, obviously undelete if he returns and proves me wrong. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:41, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Mets501 is not a retired user. He's obviously not been very active for awhile (per his userpage, he's studying physics at Harvard, which I have to imagine takes up a good amount of his time), but he's edited within the past few weeks. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Is he the type of user who would be so upset at having to undelete an abandoned file that he would be discouraged enough to leave Wikipedia? Kelly ^hi! 00:29, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - No. However, my view is that we should interact with editors in a reasonably friendly fashion even when fear of immediately driving them away from the project is not a directly motivating factor. I am sure that the next time he edits, a note asking him whether he would like to keep or delete this currently unused userspace file would receive his attention. Newyorkbrad (talk) 12:18, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - Should we do that with all images/users? Or is there a particular threshold at which we handle things with kid gloves? If so, what is that threshold? Kelly ^hi! 02:17, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Knollwood2001.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned user image - no foreseen encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 03:13, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DavidFace.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned user image; no other encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 03:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:QAG.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, can be replaced by table Skier Dude (talk) 03:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jon at The 'Shoe 006.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned user image; no other encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 03:43, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chemistry Misconceptions Table.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, no target article or encyc use supplied Skier Dude (talk) 03:47, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LKwok Penn Central.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned logo. Would otherwise move to Commons, but not entirely sure if it's encyclopedic (i.e. even worthwhile to move), as it is "based on" the Penn Central logo, which makes me think it's an original creation, which would make it unusable for anything and thus out of scope at Commons. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:28, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Golden Spike ceremony, Promontory, Utah, 10 May 1869.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. Lower resolution and overly processed duplicate of File:Golden Spike ceremony, Promontory, Utah, May 10, 1869.jpg on Commons. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alzaidi.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:07, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned user image - could be G7 given file revision history? Skier Dude (talk) 05:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coat of arms of Bijelo Polje.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This has no source and no authorship information. Public ___domain or not public ___domain, (which, without a source, author information, and/ore a date, isn't verifiable), this has to go. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:08, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Conditional Cash Transfer Nicaragua.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License dubious, likely produced by the World Bank, not created by this user or eligible for release by him. Uploader has a number of other copyvio uploads of this vein. Relisting from October 9th, where FfD failed to transclude properly. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:10, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rihanna logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned user-made logo Skier Dude (talk) 05:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bobbystanleycup.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned user image - no other encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 05:27, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Angular.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, replaceable by math template Skier Dude (talk) 05:34, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nod Obelisk.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR, LQ, no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 05:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vinteistamp.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned barnstar - superseded with SVG Skier Dude (talk) 05:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VinteiSecretPg.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned wiki screenshot - no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 05:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Barnstar-budapest.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned wiki barnstar Skier Dude (talk) 05:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Miiii.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned logo - no encyc use except on business article Skier Dude (talk) 05:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Play in Browser.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned template text/image Skier Dude (talk) 05:49, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TheWeek IndiraGandhi AwardCover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LQ Mathewkochi (talk) 06:30, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scan06-07-28 2316.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, Looks like handwritten design notes for a blog site, Without further information, encyclopaedia use looks minimal. (Re-nom as advised first listing did not appear for technical reasons.) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Teretonga Circuit.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, obseleted by File:Teretonga Circuit track map.svg a vector version with the same information. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:19, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NZL Ruapuna Long.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, obsoleted by a selection of vector versions giving the same or enhanced information. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:22, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2-2pulldown.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, obseleted by File:2-2pulldown.svg Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:12, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not orphan. In use here: Telecine. Keep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikus (talk • contribs)

No, it isn't. File:2-2pulldown.svg is the one used in that article. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:28, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hosaka-Cohen transformation.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, Equivalent content now rendered as inline math. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kudremukh10.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality, no source, no description. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:44, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete doesn't appear to ever have been inserted into article Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:42, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KOCR LUVW01.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:46, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no source, no description. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:45, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to be The King's Own Calgary Regiment (RCAC), is labeled "B Moore digital camera" below information template. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:45, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Island-of-Ireland3.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One of several proposed color schemes for an otherwise identical map. Another version was chosen, so this has served no purpose since the discussion in 2008. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:48, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Island-of-Ireland7.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One of several proposed color schemes for an otherwise identical map. Another version was chosen, so this has served no purpose since the discussion in 2008. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:48, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Island-of-Ireland3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One of several proposed color schemes for an otherwise identical map. Another version was chosen, so this has served no purpose since the discussion in 2008. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:48, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Island-of-Ireland7.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One of several proposed color schemes for an otherwise identical map. Another version was chosen, so this has served no purpose since the discussion in 2008. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:49, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beautiful view AnjumanKHAMGAON.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, twisted camera view (so not best quality), minimal description. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rocky Mountain Rocket obs.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Anomie (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image removed from article per WP:NFCC#8 and challenged. Removal rationale was, "Not nearly enough discussion to warrant multiple non-free images." The only relevant article text to support this article is, "The trains were partially articulated, however the observation cars were not articulated with the rest of the trainsets." It is not necessary to use a non-free image to understand that the observation car in the consist was not articulated like the rest of the cars. Thus this image needs to be deleted... SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geogre-7.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:49, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 19:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - In use. Are we running short of server space? --RexxS (talk) 20:08, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How many userphotos of a now-departed user should we keep? The person didn't even use them on his own userpage. Kelly ^hi! 00:26, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think I'd like to keep at least a couple of the handful that we have - as a reminder of Geogre. There's my reason for wanting to keep some of them. Now, may I just ask why you want to delete them all? --RexxS (talk) 01:40, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is in use because someone who is not the uploader decided to place them on his userpage specifically to prevent the deletion. In a month or so, when he removes the images, they will, yet again, be orphaned userphotos of inactive user. They have no encyclopedic value, RexxS is just prolonging the process needlessly. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You really need to get out of the habit of making those sort of bad faith allegations, Sven, it does not suit you. I've made around 50 edits to my userpage in almost four years, and not once have I removed content from it. I thought I had made it clear that I view Geogre as a valued contributor who deserves to be remembered. Those images will not be orphaned as long as I'm drawing breath, and you have my word on that. So face it: the images are properly licensed and in use. That complies with image policy and my "keep" is founded on policy. Now just examine what your "delete" is based on. Cheers --RexxS (talk) 15:27, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as borderline creepy. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:19, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Move this and all related photos to a milk carton. --Tryptofish (talk) 14:05, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the reason for this nomination was that the photo was orphaned; the photo is no longer orphaned, and thus that reason is no longer valid. Unless another valid, policy-based reason for deletion is proffered, the image should be kept. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:09, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 02:15, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Images of users are considered appropriate for use in userspace. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:28, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Images of one's self, sure. But a shrine to another user? That's really pushing it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:42, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'm not at all sure that Wikipedians will want to make a pilgrimage to my userpage to worship the blessed, departed Geogre. He's only been gone two years; surely it is too soon to start the campaign for his canonisation? Nevertheless, Geogre was a very significant contributor, and his treatment by ArbCom was an object lesson in not how to deal with valued editors. I will naturally refrain from making the comparison with being "martyred at the hands of the Inquisition". It seems to me though, that there ought to be a tiny bit of server space free to allow those of us who value content above all else to remember him, although I do understand why many people would want to forget. --RexxS (talk) 16:32, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geogre-5.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 19:26, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Orphaned userphoto of inactive user. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:24, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --RexxS (talk) 16:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:20, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geogre-6.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 19:26, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Orphaned userphoto of inactive user. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:24, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --RexxS (talk) 16:18, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:20, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geogre-4.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:53, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 19:27, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - In use. Are we running short of server space? --RexxS (talk) 20:07, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is in use because someone who is not the uploader decided to place them on his userpage specifically to prevent the deletion. In a month or so, when he removes the images, they will, yet again, be orphaned userphotos of inactive user. They have no encyclopedic value, RexxS is just prolonging the process needlessly. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:24, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Borderline creepy. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:20, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the reason for this nomination was that the photo was orphaned; the photo is no longer orphaned, and thus that reason is no longer valid. Unless another valid, policy-based reason for deletion is proffered, the image should be kept. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:09, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 02:15, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geogre-3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 19:28, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - In use. Are we running short of server space? --RexxS (talk) 20:07, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is in use because someone who is not the uploader decided to place them on his userpage specifically to prevent the deletion. In a month or so, when he removes the images, they will, yet again, be orphaned userphotos of inactive user. They have no encyclopedic value, RexxS is just prolonging the process needlessly. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:25, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Bordering on creepy. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:21, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the reason for this nomination was that the photo was orphaned; the photo is no longer orphaned, and thus that reason is no longer valid. Unless another valid, policy-based reason for deletion is proffered, the image should be kept. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:10, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 02:15, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geogre2111.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 19:29, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geogre edit distribution.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user graph. Kelly ^hi! 19:30, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nose cone elliptical.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, Obsoleted by Vector version. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:47, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hundred Years War family tree.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan file, completely redundant to File:Hundred Years War family tree.svg. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 21:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hundred Years War family tree.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan file, completely redundant to File:Hundred Years War family tree.svg. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 21:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HadyMirza.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan file. According to the image "© HapyHadys Fanclub" and no evidence of permission. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 21:55, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hadymirza.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File from an internet site without any evidence of permission. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 21:58, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flow bench schematic.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan media, incorrect version of File:Flow bench schematic.jpg. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 21:59, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beyonce music videos explosions.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incorporates two fair use images in one frame. | ^help _dןǝɥ | 22:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was done that way to show the similarity between the two scenes. Not only, the explosion is similar but they were shot at the same place, one in 2003 and the other one in 2008. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 04:20, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Krystal-vs-whitecastle-locations-map.svg.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PNG image extracted from SVG; not useful. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:29, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.