Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 September 16

< Wikipedia:Files for deletion

< September 15	September 17 >

September 16

File:Sabarubicin.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sabarubicin.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Louisajb (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned to the Commons SVG File:Sabarubicin.svg. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:18, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Enalaprilat2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enalaprilat2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Louisajb (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned to Commons SVG File:Enalaprilat.svg Sven Manguard Wha? 02:35, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Deadliest-catch-captains.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:18, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deadliest-catch-captains.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kitch (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 02:35, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It comes to if communicating what the cast looks like is important to understanding a show. We try to limit the number of NF images in an article and a group picture like this is clearly better than individual images. I tend to believe that in fact it helps to know what the folks in the show look like when trying to understand a show. If we decide that we should only have one NF image in the article, I'd remove the title screenshot which has much less relevance. Hobit (talk) 00:40, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Strictly speaking, WP:NFCC#8 requires only that the image adds significantly to the reader's understanding of the topic of the page (not that it be the subject of critical commentary). This image passes that criterion. See also: WP:DECORATIVE. --Tryptofish (talk) 16:52, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UST colors.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:UST colors.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wiki0508 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned, low quality Sven Manguard Wha? 02:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brac-logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brac-logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned, I do not believe that the new logo qualifies as PD-shape. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:47, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EKV - Kompanii.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:EKV - Kompanii.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Karabinier (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No foreseeable use, these are not things that are typically illustrated in articles. Also, no source given for where the information came from or who made the image. Sven Manguard Wha? 09:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SydneyMetro.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:22, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SydneyMetro.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Damaster98 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is not PD-shape, it is non-free. Currently not used in any articles, so would be deleted after seven days whether I changed the license or whether I listed it here. Sven Manguard Wha? 09:44, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AdMetTramTransAdelaide.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:22, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:AdMetTramTransAdelaide.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Normangerman (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is not PD-shape, it is non-free. Currently not used in any articles, so would be deleted after seven days whether I changed the license or whether I listed it here. Sven Manguard Wha? 09:45, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Moonstone owc.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Moonstone owc.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Oupuk (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

As the free covers of the book, like File:The Moonstone.djvu are available, usage of non-free image is not fair use. Vssun (talk) 14:52, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VickyTermy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:VickyTermy.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nikkul (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused. Source is Flickr [1], which states that the image is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic license; the "non-commercial" and "no derivatives" parts of that license are not free enough for Wikipedia. Uploader claims that the author has given permission for this image to be used on Wikipedia, but "Wikipedia-only" permission is not free enough either. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. —Bkell (talk) 17:13, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Teterin-Victor-Quince-new348bw.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 17 September 2011 (UTC) No prove that the image is listed with the proper licence. I asked the person who submitted it, but there was no proper reply. SuperMarioWoman (talk) 17:29, 16 September 2011 (UTC) {{Permission OTRS|2010032110008071}}[reply]

Leningradartist (talk) 21:52, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Skidmarks.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:29, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skidmarks.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ekin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unencyclopedic orphan image. Image had formerly illustrated the Tire article claiming to be a skid mark; but skid marks do not feature tread marks in the way shown in this image. As the image illustrates nothing in the real world, it's unencyclopedic and should be deleted. Comet Tuttle (talk) 18:15, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and change the name to tread mark or tire track. There's nothing unencyclopedic about it; the description is just wrong. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vmware logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vmware logo.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dubrie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Replaced with Vmware.svg JetBlast (talk) 18:36, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JudBirza.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:JudBirza.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Spacedub (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Source page on Flickr [2] says this photo is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0); "non-commercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia. No evidence that the copyright holder has agreed to release this under a freer license. —Bkell (talk) 21:02, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TW S4.1 The New World.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:15, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:TW S4.1 The New World.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sfxprefects (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Beautiful image, but replaceable by text and inessential to readers' understanding of the episode. ╟─Treasury Tag►directorate─╢ 21:23, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mrs KM Mathew Travelogue.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mrs KM Mathew Travelogue.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sreejithk2000 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free book cover used to illustrate the article about the person whose photo is on the cover. I assume this person is the author, but the book itself is not the subject of sourced discussion in the article. See the examples of unacceptable use of non-free images, number 9, which says, "A magazine or book cover, to illustrate the article on the person whose photograph is on the cover. …" —Bkell (talk) 22:53, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WM logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:WM logo.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Asusundevil23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused logo. The corresponding article, Wonderful Machine, was speedily deleted under WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#G11. No other encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 23:23, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_September_16&oldid=1211576056"