Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 February 10

< February 9	February 11 >

February 10

File:Soul Calibur DC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; there doesn't seem to be an issue with the fur at the moment. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:03, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it's a game, one would expect an illustration of gameplay would be necessary to show what the game is. So correct the FUR. 70.24.247.54 (talk) 06:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What's the alleged problem with the FUR? Salvidrim! 00:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:File name.ext

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "File_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put the name of the uploader just after "Uploader=", and your reason for deletion just after "Reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:FFD or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Waama (talk) 10:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tupac Amaru Shakur.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete because a free alternative has been provided Guerillero | My Talk 18:16, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural nomination: contested WP:NFCC#1 nomination using {{di-replaceable fair use}} FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 11:46, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Strong delete~~ per the simple reason of criterion number 1 at WP:NFCC. "Can this non-free content be replaced by a free version that has the same effect?" Yes, it can. With the amount of images of him on the internet, there should be at least one of Tupac that is free to use. It is replaceable, so its use cannot be classed as fair use, so it should be deleted. --andy4789 ★ · (talk? contribs?) 16:12, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Per the comment below, I have changed to weak delete, but there has to be a free image somewhere.~~ --andy4789 ★ · (talk? contribs?) 00:39, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I have looked for photos fairly extensively, but there are no free photos (or non-professional non-free photos we could request permission for) that I have found. Look at this search: all images over 600x800 (normally self-taken photos are a decent resolution, as opposed to images snagged from the internet) mentioning tupac or 2pac on flickr.com. There are only a few, and none are relevant. I say neutral as opposed to keep because it's possible that someone out there has a physical photo of Tupac (from a concert etc.) they could scan, and need to be made aware that there is a need for the photo to upload it. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The subject is dead and no "free" images have appeared in the last 15 years. Does not appear to be "replaceable". Gimmetoo (talk) 15:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A free image File:Tupac Live.jpg has just been uploaded. DrKiernan (talk) 10:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because a free replacement has been found. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete again because now there's a replacement, there's no need for this image. --andy4789 ★ · (talk? contribs?) 12:36, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Allegedly free image was deleted as a copyright violation. Gimmetoo (talk) 13:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eric Lindstrom.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user photo. Stefan2 (talk) 14:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oxamyl.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused except for User:Multichill/Free uploads/2012-01-30. Chem files should be svg and we have File:Oxamyl.svg. MGA73 (talk) 15:28, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CSDG. --Leyo 16:21, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PreityZintakank.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free screenshot in the actress's article, does not add significantly to the understanding of the actress. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:11, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep - it adds a lot in accordance with the rationale. And it was already discussed on the talk page and agreed upon. Additionally, the image is used on the article as a fair use image, and there's absolutely no problem with that. The rationale gives one hell of an explanation for that (detailing why exactly the image is essential and ending with "The image thus adds depth to the article by providing a visual representation that illustrates pertinent points in the article, in a clearer manner than could be achieved with prose alone."). In short, the image is a perfect representation of a modern Indian woman, you can't get it with prose alone. Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:59, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The role is not such a complex one, so as to represent it using a copyrighted image. Relevant points could be added in prose. X.One ^SOS 07:09, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That the role is "not such a complex one" is purely your POV. The thing is the image represents something that prose alone couldn't. Shahid • ^Talk2me 08:03, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete That image is just a generic portrait of her (her in-character role is basically indistinguishable from how she looks in normal public appearances) and does not add significantly to the article. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above 2 comments. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:55, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: A paragraph in her article describes the apperance the actress had in the film. Hence image is needed. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 15:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the opposite is true. If something can be described wholly using text, a non-free image cannot be justified (per the NFCC). Sven Manguard Wha? 16:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The description states how the subject said that this role was "an attempt to shed her vivacious public image". We also are using a critic quoting "all those who are in search of the peppy Preity, well guys you've dialed the wrong number this time." We are not describing how her hair were straight, below shoulder length, brown with dark roots or something. That kinda description whould have gone without image. But the present one needs image for understanding. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 09:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : The role can be described in prose clearly enough and it is not so complex to the extent of having a non-free image to represent it. X.One ^SOS 07:09, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Replaceable by a textual version of the image. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keeo The image is beneficial and has an adequate rationale.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
comment - maybe people who support the deletion would be more forgiving towards another image from the film? Shahid • ^Talk2me 08:11, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What happened? Someone just deleted it while we were still talking? -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 08:50, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I expected this lack of consideration from the closing admin, Fastily. I would turn to them, but they probably would not reply and let someone else do it for them. Never mind, we'll discuss it elsewhere. Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sheykh morteza ansari3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Low-quality reproduction of a drawing/painting of a 19th-century personality. Unlikely to be contemporary with the person shown. No source info given to substantiate claim of PD-old – depiction could be quite recent. Also serves no legitimate encyclopedic purpose, in the absence of any clarification whether it is in fact an authentic contemporary portrait or merely a modern artist's imaginary depiction. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:47, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:G R-Iamasurebet-1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

credited to Alberta Quarter Horse Racing Association here Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:27, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:G R-Dirty Dancing Stud.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low-res, looks like it could be a professional photo, no affirmative statement of a source, user appears to have uploaded at least one confirmed copyvio (File:G R-Iamasurebet-1.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Galla Placidia.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned crop of File:ValentinianIIIfamily.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fabian.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is of low quality and no description. Therefore it has no purpose on Wikipedia -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fabio003.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image has no encyclopedic value. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:25, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Faceex.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image has no encyclopedic value. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:27, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Facebook cairn.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution orphaned image does not have much encyclopedic value. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fabo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal image. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FaceBryan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned Personal Image -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:33, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me & me.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low quality personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me - Bryan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low quality personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me 003.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low quality personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:35, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me 01.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:35, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me 020.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low quality personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:36, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ME 2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low resolution personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:36, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ME 92.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:36, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me @ buet.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low resolution personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me @ Patti.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me age 9.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low quality personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me alone copy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me and Assie.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low quality & low resolution personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me and Bruce2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low resolution personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me and Bruce.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ME AND JEFF STRYKER.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low quality personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete as a duplicate of File:Jeff stryker 1986 polaroid.jpg. note: i am the uploader. -badmachine 23:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me and jim.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me And Larry Sparks.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned seemlingly personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me and sem.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me and the females.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low quality personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete upload is user's only contribution to wikipedia, and it's not a constructive one. Wikipedia is not Flickr. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me and the hero.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low quality personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me and the Legend.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me As The Flash.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low quality personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and WTF? Sven Manguard Wha? 16:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not more strange than File:Me Cow.jpg, is it? ;-) --Stefan2 (talk) 18:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Me at ben.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low quality personal image of no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.