Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 February 18

< February 17	February 19 >

February 18

File:Larrrry David.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan & Unencyclopedic SkyMachine ⁽⁺⁺⁾ 08:50, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Léon Bertrand.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like replaceable fair use to me since the person is still alive. The text "One is freely allowed to reproduce this image, under the condition that 'the photographic service of the French PM' is mentioned" might not be free enough: it is not clear if derivative works are allowed. Besides, there is no source for this statement. Stefan2 (talk) 11:00, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as being replaceable. The policy on photographs by the photographic service of the prime minister can be found here (in French). It says that such images should be used solely for personal, associative or professional purposes. Any dissemination or use for commercial or advertising purposes are prohibited. So this needs a fair-use rationale. De728631 (talk) 14:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LysiasBareheaded.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of an old coin with an unidentified photographer. Can be replaced by a free photo by an identified photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 11:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The source page states that "any copyright remains with the original holders." De728631 (talk) 14:39, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lysias-with-spear.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of an old coin with an unidentified photographer. Can be replaced by a free photo by an identified photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 11:02, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The source page states that "any copyright remains with the original holders." De728631 (talk) 14:39, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Giant Gift Card Giveaway.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This looks way too detailed to be a logo (as stated in the fair use rationale). Besides, it seems to fail WP:NFCC completely as the article doesn't need any fair use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:00, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. That's not a logo but a poster of some promotional campaign. Not needed to identify the company and thus not needed in the article. De728631 (talk) 14:42, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Golden Film Liever verliefd 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File is copyrighted: the source says (translated): Nothing of this website may be used for puclication without prior permission. All pictures and texts are copyrighted. Romaine (talk) 16:10, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2009 Jeffersonville Flood 002.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned local copy of a Commons file. Kelly ^hi! 16:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: What part of "The uploader or another editor requests that the local copy of this file be kept." do you not understand?--King Bedford I ^{Seek his grace} 08:43, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question - why would we keep a file here that's not being used? Kelly ^hi! 08:47, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment According to WP:DEL-REASON, it seems that any unused file may be deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2762167600081871316SijvSA fs.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, likely a derivative work. Kelly ^hi! 16:39, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2molga.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 16:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:44-barrel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unidentified subject. Kelly ^hi! 16:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:500 Block Wabash Avenue.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned local version of Commons file. Kelly ^hi! 17:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC) Oppose: What part of "The uploader or another editor requests that the local copy of this file be kept." do you not understand?--King Bedford I ^{Seek his grace} 08:42, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question - why would we keep a file here that's not being used? Kelly ^hi! 08:47, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Samesexmarriagepolls.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; gross violation of WP:NFCC. Why are we even discussing this?? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:22, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use claim based on inability to create free image. It's a graph. Of course one could make a graph of the same data. Nat Gertler (talk) 18:40, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This line graph was professionally made and plots information from various polling sources. Anyone could make a line graph on paint but it would not adequately or accurately convey the same information. A supporter could show a higher increase of support in their's, and an opponent could show that support has not yet passed the 50% mark. This is an accurate and neutral graph made by the New York Times who collected information from polling sources that the average person could not access so please keep it. Cadiomals (talk) 18:50, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Obviously invalid fair use. No one would make a line plot in Paintbrush, but software normally used for making line plots could be used instead. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:10, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No one ever has or ever will bother to take the time to do something like that. This file is being properly, relevantly and acceptably used in the only two articles it is currently or ever will be in: same-sex marriage in the united states and Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States. Cadiomals (talk) 02:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"No one ever has or ever will bother to take the time to do something like that." - and how it changes that "software normally used for making line plots could be used"? Bulwersator (talk) 19:34, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[The Google seems to disagree with the claim that no one else would or could graph public response to same-sex marriage. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:48, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFCC#1. Kelly ^hi! 02:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Evgenior (talk) 12:57, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Under what rationale? Kelly ^hi! 19:20, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The graph is based on data from neutral authoritative sources. It is very concise and and it portrays the tendencies very obviously. --Evgenior (talk) 18:35, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
But it is replaceable by a free graph made from the same data. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:43, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if the text can support a fair use rationale. I've edited the article on Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States in that direction, noting the widespread media coverage of the many polls, and attributing the graph to the New York Times. Fair use of an image generally requires sufficient text about the image, so the article needs to have enough text about the media coverage and probably about the specific graph.TVC 15 (talk) 14:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think changing the text just so we have an excuse to borrow someone else's creative property stretches what's appropriate. The specific graph (as opposed to the data it presents) didn't become relevant until it might be deleted, and it was supported by adding material to the intro of an article that was well off of the core of the topic. (I've removed it.) --Nat Gertler (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uk bond.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is part of the board game Imperial. The act of photographing it does not remove the game designer/publisher's copyright. Therefore this is non-free, and I don't think it meets NFCC #8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:42, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Investor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is part of the board game Imperial. The act of photographing it does not remove the game designer/publisher's copyright. Therefore this is non-free, and I don't think it meets NFCC #8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:42, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rondel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is part of the board game Imperial. The act of photographing it does not remove the game designer/publisher's copyright. Therefore this is non-free, and I don't think it meets NFCC #8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Imperial pieces.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is part of the board game Imperial. The act of photographing it does not remove the game designer/publisher's copyright. Therefore this is non-free, and I don't think it meets NFCC #8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Imperial bank notes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is part of the board game Imperial. The act of photographing it does not remove the game designer/publisher's copyright. Therefore this is non-free, and I don't think it meets NFCC #8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Imperial flags.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is part of the board game Imperial. The act of photographing it does not remove the game designer/publisher's copyright. Therefore this is non-free, and I don't think it meets NFCC #8 Sven Manguard Wha? 19:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dhearthlogo2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Useless, as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DragonHearth resulted in deletion of DragonHearth. Unused. Bulwersator (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Also no proof of permission. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:21, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AirTerrorTimeMag.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, possibly non-free. Kelly ^hi! 20:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bradley Parker.jp.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Bulwersator (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Andrew Demcak headshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 21:13, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arrosaurer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 21:44, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And unfree (derivative work of a toy). --Stefan2 (talk) 23:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ASignFromTheSky.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 22:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ask the Shulgins PRINT.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 22:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HillaryHoward.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free screenshot that is only used in an infobox on Hillary Howard (although she does host It's Academic, it is not essential for the purposes of an infobox picture that she be depicted hosting It's Academic). As Howard is a living person, the presumption is that a free photo could be taken of her (perhaps hosting It's Academic, because, as I understand it, Altman Prods. is less strict about a no-camera policy than other producers). In any event, the use of this image violates WP:NFCC criterion #1 (replaceability). RJaguar3 | u | t 22:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Orleans County ny seal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the official seal of Orleans County, New York, although it claims to be. I have uploaded the correct seal here. This may be a candidate for speedy, but I wanted to nominate it here just in case. Andrew (User:90) (talk) 22:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ZenCopian.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Bulwersator (talk) 23:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Enblem of the United Kingdom of America.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused fictional coat of arms. Editor retired Bulwersator (talk) 23:28, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oldest people in the world.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused useless file (outdated) Bulwersator (talk) 23:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Listofsuperpowers.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused useless OR (without sources) Bulwersator (talk) 23:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wealthy Historical PhotoCaption.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo Bulwersator (talk) 23:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.