Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 February 3

< February 2	February 4 >

February 3

File:Zzzp.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Even though this image is in PD. High quality versions exist in Commons. See: File:Zoso.svg. Sumanch (talk) 05:24, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zzzp2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Even though this image is in PD. High quality versions exist in Commons. See: File:Zoso.svg. Sumanch (talk) 05:25, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Horse Against A South Gisborne Sunrise.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Eustress (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely picture, but just not encyclopedic. The uploader even admits it's not really encyclopedic at a picture peer review: Wikipedia:Picture_peer_review/Domestic_Horse_Against_A_Sunrise ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:58, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing wrong, this file can be used. Moving to commons Bulwersator (talk) 06:45, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Diesel logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 06:37, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The file is in Commons. It was proposed for deletion and the result was to keep. So, this should have been CSD'd F8. Sumanch (talk) 09:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wowow Logo2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 06:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Suisse geographique.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", nominated for deletion on commons, kept on commons, can be deleted as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 06:41, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TAMmercosurLogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transferred to commons, tagged here as "NotMovedToCommons", but I think that move was correct Bulwersator (talk) 12:16, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons dosen't have a statement on Paraguay's threshold of originality, and Paraguay appears to use Civil law, so it wouldn't fall under the blanket Common Law provision. In the absence of something indicating that it isn't okay under Paraguay's threshold of originality laws, I say treat it as okay for Commons. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:56, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Swem portrait.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that the painting itself is PD, and based on the timeline (subject died in the 1960s), it's unlikely. This would mean that the photo of the painting cannot be released under a free license. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:District-Arizona.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. Also on Commons under a different file format: File:District of Arizona District Court.png Stefan2 (talk) 19:19, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - you do understand that this is an animated gif, right? Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:12, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It was easy to miss the animation. It is distinct and in official use. I don't see it offering much over similar images, but that is no reason to delete. Although I do wonder why they would decide to animate their district court seal. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I see the animation now. It looks strange to see it animated, but there's no need to delete it. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:28, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mhggk.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image, lack of description makes this unencyclopedic, possible copyright problems as uploader has a history of violations. Acather96 (talk) 19:31, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment File was used in a now deleted article. "Latha Rajendran & Family with Dr. MGR and Janaki Ramachandran". --MGA73 (talk) 19:16, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So if file is free then I suggest we move to Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 19:18, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EASTER.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This has {{not moved to Commons}} with the reason being that the image isn't entirely identical to this image. It seems that the first version on Commons is identical and that it was then updated on Commons by cropping it. I think that this can be deleted here. Stefan2 (talk) 19:32, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Obvious crop is obvious. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bolender kurt ss.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A higher quality and public ___domain photograph has been submitted in its place and can be seen on the page "Kurt Bolender". Hoops gza (talk) 19:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MR-album-poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary image. Uploaded for use on My Revenge (band), which has now been deleted through AfD, so image is orphaned and does not appear to serve any function now. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:47, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MyRevenge- Spencer Crispe-003.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary image. Uploaded for use on My Revenge (band), which has now been deleted through AfD, so image is orphaned and does not appear to serve any function now. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TRMapLaraLocations.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The file has been converted into a map with markers on the Tomb Raider article. Go and see the end of this section. Thanks! TudorTulok (talk) 22:28, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Obersturmführer Christian Wirth.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A higher quality and public ___domain version of this photo has been uploaded to Wikipedia and placed on the appropriate pages. Hoops gza (talk) 22:32, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Caramel Color in a Cola.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

obsolete Skoot13 (talk) 22:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC) replaced by Caramel Color in cola.jpg in caramel color[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HarpoMarx41e.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Other free alternatives of Marx exist. Also, there is no fair-use rationale for the article A Night at the Opera (film). The Lovable Wolf (talk) 23:29, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I added the Non-free media information and use rationale for its use in A Night at the Opera (film). What suitable free alternatives are available? — Loadmaster (talk) 23:00, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article Harpo Marx: fails WP:NFCC since there are free alternatives (e.g. File:Harpo Marx playing the harp.jpeg). If you want to have a close shot of him, you could crop the harp image.
Article A Night at the Opera (film): a few unfree images are needed in the article, but there are currently more unfree images there than what usually seems to be the case in articles about unfree films. I think that some images should be removed, but I have no opinion on which ones to remove. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:57, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.