Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 March 2

< March 1	March 3 >

March 2

File:Taiwan map.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The 2003 revision has neither source nor licence. The other two revisions are unused and already exist as GIF on Commons and could probably be deleted. Stefan2 (talk) 00:41, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Couscous.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2004 revision is unfree. The other revisions might be useless. Stefan2 (talk) 00:46, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cushing Hall 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be from http://hcap.artstor.org/cgi-bin/library?a=d&d=p758 Mosmof (talk) 02:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, copyvio. De728631 (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cushing Hall Back.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be from: http://hcap.artstor.org/cgi-bin/library?a=d&d=p758 Mosmof (talk) 02:09, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, copyvio. De728631 (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SwamiRama.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely to be a personal photo - is found all over the internet, including in versions that are less tightly cropped[1] Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:45, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SwamiRamaSitting.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

uploader lied about the source of another similar photo, first saying it was a press photo then reuploading it and calling it a "personal photo". this image is found all over the internet including here. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:57, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Saxman.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

db-g3 144.173.5.196 (talk) 03:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. DB-G3 is vandalism/hoax and no evidence has been offered that those apply. The IP address raising this FfD proposal is registered to the University of Exeter. I would expect someone at a university to be able to communicate more coherently. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment See also File talk:Saxman.JPG where the same person has placed an unsigned comment about the same photo. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Transfer to Commons:Category:Saxophonists. The deletion rationale is nonsense. De728631 (talk) 15:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned and very low quality so it may be good to delete it. However, I agree that the nominator didn't give any good reason. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as low quality Bulwersator (talk) 18:45, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This article is indeed a hoax as it is about my little brother and was posted as a joke, hence it being an orphaned article and no linking or referencing. Rather confused as to what possible value some of the contributors to this thread may think such a poor quality image may have to wikipedia to warrant its retention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.182.135.158 (talk) 00:34, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Saxman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{db-g3}} 144.173.5.196 (talk) 03:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:View of Saturn from Polydeuces.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Random orphaned screenshoot from Celestia Bulwersator (talk) 09:09, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I used to use it as a sample image for my "celestial objects workshop" where I uploaded Celestia screenshots for requested celestial objects. This workshop no longer exists and so the image isn't needed anymore. Double sharp (talk) 13:25, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vijaya.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Bulwersator (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vijay1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Bulwersator (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vik1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Bulwersator (talk) 09:11, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vik3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Bulwersator (talk) 09:11, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vikapose.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Bulwersator (talk) 09:11, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vikas.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Bulwersator (talk) 09:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vikassharma.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Bulwersator (talk) 09:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vikedal-smrifle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Bulwersator (talk) 09:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vikki Richards.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Bulwersator (talk) 09:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VikkiAS.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Bulwersator (talk) 09:13, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vinotemp Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo Bulwersator (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Violet bar txt.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Useless, unused Bulwersator (talk) 09:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MS Viking Princess.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free photograph of a cruise ship, FUR argues that it no longer exists "in this condition". However, free alternative photographs of the same ship a few years later exist; changes are merely trivial modifications of livery. Picture is being used merely in an image gallery, without further commentary. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:52, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If at all this image should be shown in Palm Beach Princess, the article on the very ship, not the cruise line. However, the quality of this image is really bad and there is already another image in the ship's article. De728631 (talk) 16:23, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ciaran Farrell - Howth - Dublin, Ireland.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Person still alive. OTRS permission but it says that it is copyrighted, so I would guess that the permission only is for Wikipedia, unless an OTRS person can tell otherwise. If only for Wikipedia, it fails WP:NFCC#1. Stefan2 (talk) 13:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriate Creative Commons licenses are to be applied to images at http://www.ciaranfarrell.com/downloads.php in the coming days, including this one. Pook2000 11:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pook2000 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:McChrystalOgden - PluckBlow - Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in a discography. Fails WP:NFCC#8 because of WP:NFC#UUI §2. Stefan2 (talk) 13:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ciaran Farrell Around and About.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in a discography. Fails WP:NFCC#8 because of WP:NFC#UUI §2. Stefan2 (talk) 13:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NFC#UUI does not apply to sound files. Critical commentary giving contextual significance in accompanying article. Appropriate FUR provided. Thincat (talk) 17:31, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- OK then, WP:NFCC#3a: no need for two sound files. WP:NFCC#8: the individual songs are not critically discussed and would at most be mentioned by title in a discography. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:14, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Although the section heading is "Discography", both songs are critically discussed (see Ciarán Farrell). 3a says "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information" and it it not clear how one clip can give information about two works and discussions. However, we are here to discuss such matters. Thincat (talk) 09:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Contemporary Music from Ireland - Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in a discography. Fails WP:NFCC#8 because of WP:NFC#UUI §2. Stefan2 (talk) 13:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ciaran Farrell - Perfect State - Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in a discography. Fails WP:NFCC#8 because of WP:NFC#UUI §2. Stefan2 (talk) 13:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NFC#UUI does not apply to sound files. Critical commentary giving contextual significance in accompanying article. Appropriate FUR provided. Although the section heading is "Discography", this work and File:Ciaran_Farrell_Around_and_About.ogg are critically discussed (see Ciarán Farrell). 3a says "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information" and it it not clear how one clip can give information about two works and discussions. However, we are here to discuss such matters. Thincat (talk) 09:53, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Katie McMahon - Shine - Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in a discography. Fails WP:NFCC#8 because of WP:NFC#UUI §2. Stefan2 (talk) 13:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ciaran Farrell - Jolt - Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in a discography. Fails WP:NFCC#8 because of WP:NFC#UUI §2. Stefan2 (talk) 13:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ciaran Farrell Perfect State.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in a discography. Fails WP:NFCC#8 because of WP:NFC#UUI §2. Stefan2 (talk) 13:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NFC#UUI does not apply to sound files. Critical commentary giving contextual significance in accompanying article. Appropriate FUR provided. Thincat (talk) 17:26, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- OK then, WP:NFCC#3a: no need for two sound files. WP:NFCC#8: the individual songs are not critically discussed and would at most be mentioned by title in a discography. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:14, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JohnFeeley - E-Motion - Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in a discography. Fails WP:NFCC#8 because of WP:NFC#UUI §2. Stefan2 (talk) 13:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vinozito 111.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely and completely useless file Bulwersator (talk) 16:17, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The file was uploaded for userbox, for the Macedonian Rainbow (political party) in Greece. If it is not used, it may be deleted.--MacedonianBoy (talk) 16:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Derek Ridgers - skinhead backdrop1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non free image. The person in question is still alive and I don't see a great deal of critical commentary about the image. So I initially tagged it as "di-replaceable fair use" because we have a living person. Uploader claims his image is valid, I think it's better to have a full consensus on this one, rather than a pseudo speedy, so I'm changing it to FfD. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:52, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Copy of uploader's original response) There is NO comparable free image available of both singer AND backdrop. IMPORTANT NOTE - the subject of this image is a combination of two things: the photographic backdrop utilising the Skinhead Girls photo by Derek Ridgers in relation to its use by the singer Morrissey at this particular concert; the subject is NOT just Morrissey and NOT just the backdrop, it is a combination of both - and there is no other free image available of this subject combination, which is why permission was sought and granted by the original author of the image Affable Familiar (talk) 12:37, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. As I say, the image in question is a very specific portrait of something discussed in depth in the entry 'Derek Ridgers', relating to the use of a Derek Ridgers photograph as the backdrop during the concert portrayed in the image; so the image is not of Morrissey per se, but of him in relation to a Derek Ridgers photograph - the backstory of which is a significant and well-known part of Derek Ridgers ouvre. There is no other comparable image that could be used here, and I think it makes a fair and valuable illustrative point regarding this part of the subject's history. Thanks. Affable Familiar (talk) 14:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Person still alive. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The image meets all ten criteria listed in the 'Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria' page; and I can't see that there is any mention among the 10 criteria that a person featured in the image must not be alive. 109.170.220.22 (talk) 20:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- See WP:NFC#UUI §1 & wmf:Resolution:Licensing policy §3. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If it does stay, it needs reducing in size - 502px for the smaller dimension is about 2 times too big. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 15:07, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: 'See WP:NFC#UUI'.
(1) Under Unacceptable Use it says: 'Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopaedic purpose as the non-free image.

So this image falls into the category of those that it would NOT be considered possible to replace with a new image even though the subject is alive because it would be impossible to recreate the circumstance of the image utilising Deerek Ridgers background photograph.

(2) Unnacceptable Use also says: 'However, for some retired or disbanded groups, or retired individuals whose notability rests in large part on their earlier visual appearance, a new picture may not serve the same purpose as an image taken during their career, in which case the use would be acceptable.'

This image effectively represents a part of the subjct's career that is in the past and that cannot be replicated or updated, and so no replacement photograph could be taken that would serve the same purpose as this image taken during that part of their career.

NOTE: Morrissey has also announced in interviews that it seems unlikely he will record again, which would move him closer to the defintion of 'retired individuals'; The Guardian quotes, 'A new Morrissey album is growing "less and less likely", the singer has revealed... "I now no longer expect to live long enough to experience an offer to record for a grownup label," he wrote this week.' - http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2011/dec/23/morrissey-chances-new-album-receding
Affable Familiar (talk) 17:33, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Re: image size - in preview the image is only 160 x 239 and on the page entry it is only 220 x 329. If it is larger on full resolution then by all means reduce the full resolution size. Thanks.

: The image now seems to have been deleted but without further debate on the 'Files for Deletion' page. So, after the image being there for two years without dispute, enhancing the page in the way it illustrated an event that no other available image could comparably do, the image is now removed, leaving the entry less interesting and less well illustrated as a result. Well done. It seems more of a defeat than a victory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Affable Familiar (talk • contribs) 21:14, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Green Line branches.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Green Line branches.jpg; ineligible for fair use so discussion should happen at Commons. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:55, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.