Contents
- 1 March 7
- 1.1 File:Republican Party presidential primaries results, 2012 (protanopia-friendly).png
- 1.2 File:Car bomb.jpg
- 1.3 File:Gurustill.jpg
- 1.4 File:JustDanceLady Gaga.jpg
- 1.5 File:Song of David 1952.jpg
- 1.6 File:VietKhangMovementQRCode4WPLink.png
- 1.7 File:EpidermisPainted.jpg
- 1.8 File:Fracture Rates.jpg
- 1.9 File:2000px-Quicken Loans.png
- 1.10 File:Project Contrecoeur.jpg
- 1.11 File:Mercier-est neighbourhood.JPG
- 1.12 File:RSCSolutionBriefWhitepaper.pdf
- 1.13 File:Daily Mirror printing plate 10.10.74 .JPG
.png){kind=link}
March 7
edit.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Republican Party presidential primaries results, 2012 (protanopia-friendly).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SaveATreeEatAVegan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
.png&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3AFiles+for+deletion%2F2012+March+7%23File%3ARepublican+Party+presidential+primaries+results%2C+2012+%28protanopia-friendly%29.png%5D%5D){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=history){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
unnecessary; File:Republican Party presidential primaries results, 2012.svg has now been made color-blind friendly anyway. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:52, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Car bomb.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pacerlaser (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Useless photos. One of them without source and licence. Stefan2 (talk) 13:22, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gurustill.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hariharan91 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Two FUR images are using on a single article. Kiran Gopi (talk) 13:33, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:JustDanceLady Gaga.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Berbah (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
WP:NFCC#8 - no critical commentary Mosmof (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Inappropriate for fair use. Ridiculous Crown Copyright tag. Uploaded by a serial copyright violator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:37, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Song of David 1952.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikiwatcher1 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
no proof of copyright non-renewal. we have several PD portraits of marc chagall, so this cannot be kept by adding a fair use rationale. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:41, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no copyright renewal found from an online search of copyright. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 19:39, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:VietKhangMovementQRCode4WPLink.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tnguyen (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Why is this relevant? I've never seen QR codes in articles about other movements. Stefan2 (talk) 16:15, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:EpidermisPainted.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DRosenbach (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, replaced by File:EpidermisPainted.svg. No need to keep. Stefan2 (talk) 16:31, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the SVG has an invalid license. It is a derivative image of something that isn't PD (it's CC/GFDL), so even though the attribution path is indicated in the Commons SVG image, the license is wrong, since it has to be CC/GFDL and not PD. 70.24.251.71 (talk) 05:38, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the Commons SVG image has been nominated for deletion as a copyright violation. See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/2012/03/10 . 70.24.251.71 (talk) 05:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, I didn't notice the different licences. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:09, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fracture Rates.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DRosenbach (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Replaced by File:Clinical Fracture Rates for Nonvital teeth.svg. No need to keep. Stefan2 (talk) 16:34, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:2000px-Quicken Loans.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Clayc313 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused. Replaced in use by current logo. Cloudbound (talk) 18:29, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Project Contrecoeur.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mars2mogwai (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Invalid fair use, I'd say. Looks like a map but it could be replaced by a different map. The file has a fair use rationale but it is not written for the article in which the file is used but for a different file. Stefan2 (talk) 19:41, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mercier-est neighbourhood.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mars2mogwai (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Very blurry, but it might be the only free image we have of Mercier-Est. What do you say, keep or delete? Stefan2 (talk) 19:42, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to commons, but remove from the article. I could see it maybe in a commons gallery, but not in the article. It's a fairly generic cityscape image for Montreal, and could be of many places there, if we didn't know that it was actually Tetraultville. 70.24.251.71 (talk) 05:35, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RSCSolutionBriefWhitepaper.pdf (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tjohnston1978 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This is a white paper published by SAP. Page 4 of the document clearly asserts copyright with "all rights reserved". The uploader does not appear to have the authority to release this SAP document to the public ___domain. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:55, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Daily Mirror printing plate 10.10.74 .JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Boislands (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unclear if {{PD-text}} or {{PD-shape}}. Orphaned. Might not be useful. Stefan2 (talk) 21:14, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it looks like a copyright violation. The text in the image is itself copyrighted, since it's the coverpage of a newspaper. 70.24.251.71 (talk) 05:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The page is certainly copyrighted as an artistic work in the country of origin, and maybe also as a literary work. However, I'm not sure if it is copyrighted in the United States, which is why I wrote that it is unclear if any of those tags applies. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:05, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It is definitely copyrighted as a textual work, since it is the frontpage of a commercial newspaper, and properly attributed as such, and the paper isn't especially old, so the copyright has not expired yet. If you photograph a page from a book (or its plate) it still carries the copyright of the book, this is just a reproduction of a newspaper frontpage, as such it is a verbatim copy. 70.24.251.71 (talk) 16:05, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The page is certainly copyrighted as an artistic work in the country of origin, and maybe also as a literary work. However, I'm not sure if it is copyrighted in the United States, which is why I wrote that it is unclear if any of those tags applies. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:05, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.