Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 November 18

< Wikipedia:Files for deletion
< November 17 November 19 >

November 18

edit

File:Little Girl in the Big Ten.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little Girl in the Big Ten.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Life on the fast lane.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Life on the fast lane.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Milhousedensity.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milhousedensity.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lisasdatewithdensity.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lisasdatewithdensity.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Simpsons 8F05.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simpsons 8F05.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FABF06.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:FABF06.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marge vs. Singles, Seniors, Childless Couples and Teens, and Gays.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marge vs. Singles, Seniors, Childless Couples and Teens, and Gays.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Francisco97 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MargeGetsAJob.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MargeGetsAJob.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fr4zer (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marge Simpson in Screaming Yellow Honkers scene.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marge Simpson in Screaming Yellow Honkers scene.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Registered user 92 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marge On The Lam.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marge On The Lam.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fr4zer (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) This does make reference to other media, but is hardly necessary for understanding and is not contrasted with media which it is referencing. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Last Exit to Springfield scene.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Last Exit to Springfield scene.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Registered user 92 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Thousand Monkeys.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Thousand Monkeys.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Simpsons 5F05.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 01:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Simpsons 5F05.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep — the image appears to depict the main plot element (skeleton of angel) around which the episode revolves. As there is no non-free alternative, suggest retention, but revise caption or image description to indicate the centrality of the image to the episode's content. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:24, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lisainthefuture.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. — ξxplicit 01:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lisainthefuture.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The image in question shows the redesigns of two major characters for the episode. The redesigns are discussed at length in the article, and the image helps aid the readers' understanding of these designs. -- Scorpion0422 20:03, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "Everything in the episode had to be redesigned, which included new sets and all of the characters had to be remodeled for their age.[6] In most cases, the adults were made heavier, had a few lines added to the face and less hair. On Homer, the redesign was minimal, making him a bit heavier, removing one hair and placing an extra line under the eye.[6]" Theleftorium (talk) 17:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Nom ignored extensive discussion in article prose. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — I would support inclusion of an image related to the fortune teller incident, but the relatively generic father-of-the-bride plot-line-possible scenario does not enhance the reader's understanding beyond the title of the episode. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Escalator to Nowhere.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escalator to Nowhere.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — The "escalator to nowhere" is not mentioned in the article other than in the caption of the image. If there were a relevant passage related to this artifact in the article, I would support inclusion; in the absence of such a passage, there is not justification for retaining the image. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:31, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:9f02.gif

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:9f02.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CTF83! (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MilhouseNdCoastGuards.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MilhouseNdCoastGuards.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thenewmilhouse.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thenewmilhouse.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by UZiBLASTER7 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Savingsimpsons.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Savingsimpsons.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by UZiBLASTER7 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Simpsons PABF14.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Simpsons PABF14.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BSRF (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lost Our Lisa.PNG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lost Our Lisa.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chris6730 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lts2.PNG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep here (but file has no rationale for new ___location at present and will be tagged as such.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:14, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lts2.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xihix (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lts1.PNG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lts1.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xihix (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lisa's Rival Fugitive.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 01:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lisa's Rival Fugitive.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Simpsons 3G02.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Simpsons 3G02.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lisa's Rival.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lisa's Rival.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GABF05.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GABF05.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:39, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oh Brother Where Art Thou.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oh Brother Where Art Thou.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Keyser Söze (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:40, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Burns on the 19th century woodcut.JPG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burns on the 19th century woodcut.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Darth Kalwejt (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:My Mother the Carjacker.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:My Mother the Carjacker.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Keyser Söze (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New Kid On The Block.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Kid On The Block.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fr4zer (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BartMina.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BartMina.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mysistermysitter.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mysistermysitter.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mr. Sprintz.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mr. Sprintz.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Holiday56 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Milhouse of Sand and Fog scene.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milhouse of Sand and Fog scene.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sandandfog united.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sandandfog united.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by UZiBLASTER7 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ocgang simpsons.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ocgang simpsons.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by UZiBLASTER7 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oklahoma simpsons.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:14, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oklahoma simpsons.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by UZiBLASTER7 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Moe Letter Blues.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moe Letter Blues.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mohojohn (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GABF01.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GABF01.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Milhouse Doesn't Live Here Anymore.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:14, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milhouse Doesn't Live Here Anymore.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jangelt (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:44, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BenderSimpsons.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:14, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BenderSimpsons.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mountain of Madness.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mountain of Madness.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HomerTows.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HomerTows.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Teletubbies11x15.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teletubbies11x15.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:My Big Fat Geek Wedding.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:My Big Fat Geek Wedding.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:46, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Million Dollar Abie.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Million Dollar Abie.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by IRbaboon (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:47, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MoaningLisa.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MoaningLisa.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mrom (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:47, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mr plow ad.JPG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mr plow ad.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mriya (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:49, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FABF16.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:FABF16.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:49, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GABF07.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GABF07.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DaDeath.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:DaDeath.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mothersimpson.PNG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mothersimpson.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Homer and Mona.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 01:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Homer and Mona.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The image shows the redesigns of two major characters, which is discussed at length in the article. The image helps the readers' understanding of those designs. -- Scorpion0422 20:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Response Could this not be conveyed adequately with text? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"A picture is worth a thousand words." Obama's image could easily be described in text too. -- Scorpion0422 14:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Response And any images of Obama in his article are freely-licensed. I don't understand your point. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "Mona Simpson was designed in a way so that she has little bit of Homer in her face, such as the shape of her upper lip and her nose.[6] There were several design changes because the directors were trying to make her an attractive older and younger woman, but still be Simpson-esque." Theleftorium (talk) 17:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Response Then the image needs to accompany that portion of the text and it needs to be either taken out of the other article where it is used or that critical explanation needs to be applied there. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
But that's not what your deletion rationale says. Your rationale claims that the image is decorative, not that it's used in the wrong ___location. -- Scorpion0422 21:03, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. PLEASE ADD NFUR for each article where image is used! --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MotherSimpson2.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:MotherSimpson2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jjatsimpsons.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:14, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jjatsimpsons.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by UZiBLASTER7 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SpongebobSimpsons.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:15, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SpongebobSimpsons.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Selma's Choice 2.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F6 by Zscout370 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:07, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Selma's Choice 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zscout370 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Simpsons episode for wikipedia article.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:15, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simpsons episode for wikipedia article.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tellyaddict (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Simpson and Delilah.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simpson and Delilah.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Voltex115 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:She of Little Faith.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:She of Little Faith.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Postcards From The Wedge.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Postcards From The Wedge.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TEHCHUCKLEBROTHERS (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Skinner's Sense of Snow.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skinner's Sense of Snow.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1811-Simpsons.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:07, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1811-Simpsons.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sumanthjv (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SBLG War Room.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 01:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SBLG War Room.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The image illustrates a moment discussed in the text. It shows a reference to the movie Dr. Strangelove, and the image helps the reader understand this reference. -- Scorpion0422 20:05, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Response The Simpsons has dozens of spoofs and sight gags every episode and although non-free media that illustrate each of them are helpful in understanding, it must be significantly educational to pass fair use guidelines. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:19, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Nom ignored discussion of the scene in the article prose, against policy. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This image makes plain the reference to Dr. Strangelove and is thus educational for some value of "educational". Mangoe (talk) 16:26, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bob's Last Gleaming.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:07, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bob's Last Gleaming.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Realty Bites.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Realty Bites.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CTF83! (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rome-old and Juli-eh.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rome-old and Juli-eh.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SoWhy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GABF21.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GABF21.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Classtruggle.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 01:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Classtruggle.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Theleftorium (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:13, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep You're obviously mass-nominating screenshots for deletion without even bothering to see if they pass NFCC#8. This one does, as the design of Marge's dress is discussed in the article. Theleftorium (talk) 10:47, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Response Of course it's discussed, but this image is not critical for readers' understanding. If (e.g.) there was a picture of Kennedy wearing it and then one of Marge for comparison, that would be different. As it stands, we only have the one, so we can't actually compare how similar they are. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 12:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • You're ignoring this part of the article:

The show's creator, Matt Groening, was worried that such a detailed dress would look "weird" on a Simpsons character because they are "simply designed" and their clothing is "very generic".[5] He ended up liking the design, though, and Dietter thought it looked "good" on Marge. Oakley also liked the design and thought the cut on Marge was "flattering".[4] The country club women's clothes were changed in every scene, something Dietter thought was hard to do because the animators had to come up with new designs.

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Nom ignored discussion of image and image topic in article prose. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Simpsons Roasting.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simpsons Roasting.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:13, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rosebud (The Simpsons).png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosebud (The Simpsons).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:13, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Simpson Tide.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simpson Tide.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:14, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STVillage People.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:STVillage People.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:14, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reservoir Cats.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reservoir Cats.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Simpsoncalifragilisticexpiala(Annoyed Grunt)cious.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simpsoncalifragilisticexpiala(Annoyed Grunt)cious.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SmokeLisa.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SmokeLisa.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PeanutShrimp.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PeanutShrimp.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PleaseHomerDontHammerEm.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PleaseHomerDontHammerEm.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:QuimbyBobDebate.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:QuimbyBobDebate.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SimpsonsAllThePresidentsMen.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SimpsonsAllThePresidentsMen.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Regarding Margie.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Regarding Margie.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dspserpico (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rasahggitcotfh.JPG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rasahggitcotfh.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:17, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rednecks and Broomsticks.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rednecks and Broomsticks.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dungcamed2010 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:17, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Springfield Connection (Simpsons episode - screenshot).jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Springfield Connection (Simpsons episode - screenshot).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by The wub (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HABF02.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HABF02.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ginothewino (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:29, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BretHartTheSimpsons.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BretHartTheSimpsons.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by McPhail (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lisa and Burns.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lisa and Burns.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ozmodiar.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ozmodiar.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Simpsons 4F21.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Simpsons 4F21.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Simpsons 4F23.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Simpsons 4F23.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:32, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Old Man and the Key.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Old Man and the Key.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:32, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Sweetest Apu.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Sweetest Apu.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:32, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thespringfieldfiles.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thespringfieldfiles.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:33, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GABF08.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GABF08.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enyo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:33, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nelson and Bart.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nelson and Bart.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:33, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Simpsonswriters.JPG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simpsonswriters.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Simpsons 4F12.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Simpsons 4F12.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Canyonero.JPG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canyonero.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ryan Holloway (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Simpsons 5F10.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Simpsons 5F10.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Parent Rap.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Parent Rap.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Temptation of homer.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Temptation of homer.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Theleftorium (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thefrontsimpsons.PNG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thefrontsimpsons.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ryan Holloway (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thefront writers.JPG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thefront writers.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mriya (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Joy Of Sect.PNG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Joy Of Sect.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chris6730 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Barney 9x13 .png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barney 9x13 .png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Skier Dude (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HomerTheyFallPoster.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HomerTheyFallPoster.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Homer They Fall Painting.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 01:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Homer They Fall Painting.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep Illustrates the parallel to the Bellows painting and is thus educational. Mangoe (talk) 17:04, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Great Wife Hope Simpsons.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Great Wife Hope Simpsons.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SuperFlash101 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PTA Disbands!(Jasper).jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PTA Disbands!(Jasper).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fr4zer (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:S18e01.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:S18e01.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ptadisbands!.JPG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ptadisbands!.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Frying Game.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Frying Game.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Treehouse of Horror IIa.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Treehouse of Horror IIa.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CTF83! (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:39, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Today I am A Clown scene.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Today I am A Clown scene.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ief (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:39, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thirty Minutes over Tokyo.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thirty Minutes over Tokyo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:40, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Wettest Stories Ever Told.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Wettest Stories Ever Told.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by IRbaboon (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:40, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hungry are the Damned.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hungry are the Damned.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CTF83! (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) Although the drooling is mentioned, I'm not sure this is sufficiently educational (read: necessary for understanding.) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:40, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wife Aquatic.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wife Aquatic.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Barnacle Bay.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barnacle Bay.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wife Aquatic Crew.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wife Aquatic Crew.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Way We Weren't.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Way We Weren't.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CTF83! (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Treehouse of Horror IIIb.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Treehouse of Horror IIIb.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CTF83! (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bart ClockworkOrange.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:08, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bart ClockworkOrange.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChuckyDarko (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alfred Hitchcock's Silhouette.JPG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 01:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alfred Hitchcock's Silhouette.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mriya (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep The text discusses this image, and it enhances understanding to be able to see it. Mangoe (talk) 17:02, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Why is Homer's mimickry of Alfred Hitchcock silhouette not necessary to illustrate? Certainly, out of all fat jokes, omitting this image would not help readers recognize the critical moment. Text doesn't help readers imagine an actual scene, and using an image of Hitchcock won't help matters. --George Ho (talk) 19:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Trashofthetitanstruck.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trashofthetitanstruck.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thislittlewiggy2.PNG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thislittlewiggy2.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xihix (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Simpsons 5F13.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Simpsons 5F13.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Theres No Disgrace Like Home.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Theres No Disgrace Like Home.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Keyser Söze (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:44, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:They Saved Lisa's Brain.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:They Saved Lisa's Brain.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:44, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SimpsonsMPG 7G07.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SimpsonsMPG 7G07.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DChiuch (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:44, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Simpsons 5F14.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Simpsons 5F14.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Twtt2.PNG

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Twtt2.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xihix (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thetwistedworldofmargesimpson.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thetwistedworldofmargesimpson.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Apusmotherfalls.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apusmotherfalls.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Simpsonswhiteyford.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simpsonswhiteyford.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:46, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Simpsons 5F04.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Simpsons 5F04.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mcmillin24 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:46, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Treehouse of Horror VIa.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Treehouse of Horror VIa.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:48, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Peabodyandshermansimpsons.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peabodyandshermansimpsons.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gran2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:48, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Treehouse of Horror XII.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Treehouse of Horror XII.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:48, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:THOH8Homega.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:THOH8Homega.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:49, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hugo Simpson.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hugo Simpson.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:49, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Homer Dole Clinton.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Homer Dole Clinton.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lisa Genesis Tub.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lisa Genesis Tub.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete I don't see what this picture is telling us beyond what the text says. Mangoe (talk) 16:59, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:THOH8Marge.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:THOH8Marge.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete Marge as a witch looks like, well, Marge as a witch. I don't see the added value. Mangoe (talk) 16:57, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:THOH8censor.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:THOH8censor.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep I think it is educational to see the scene that had the censorship issues. Mangoe (talk) 16:56, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kingwrong-bridezilla.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kingwrong-bridezilla.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Giantdevilfish (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The point of the upload was to show how King Kong vs Godzilla has had a pop culture influence that's felt decades after the films early 60's release. When a show like The Simpsons pays homage to the film decades after the film was originally released it just goes to show you its significance from that stand point. The picture nicely illustrates and shows readers an example of the films legacy which is why its featured in that section of the article giving a critical example of a particular films impact felt decades later, which is the point of that particular section of the article. And while the deletion won't "significantly diminish" the readers understanding of the article (I mean which picture would?), it would give readers an example and understanding of the films legacy with its inclusion.Giantdevilfish (talk) 18:22, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Response We cannot keep non-free media that are simply helpful or nice, but which are significantly important or critical for understanding. Several pieces of media fit this criterion, but by your own admission, this one doesn't. The Simpsons has sight gags about literally hundreds (possibly thousands) of public figures, pop culture trends, and other media; are you suggesting that we add screengrabs for all of them? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This goes beyond something that simply looks "nice". It illustrates an important part of the article giving an example of the films legacy. The whole point of having pictures on articles is to give the reader a better understanding of certain portions of the article complementing the text. Its the same way text books have pictures in them to help the readers better understand certain portions of the literature. In this case it will better illustrate the legacy of that film by giving a great visual reference of its legacy and using a popular show in the process. So when someone reads the legacy section they will say "Oh wow this film was even payed homaged to by the Simpsons?". How many specific Godzilla or Japanese films in general get that kind of treatment from a pop culture style show with International appeal like The Simpsons? I don't even recall any Japanese programs that have done that with this particular movie, so it shows how this foreign film has been viewed or acknowledged by an American show showcasing its International significance.Giantdevilfish (talk) 16:22, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Response Every piece of non-free media must be justified as being educational and critically important to users' understanding of the topic. You cannot justify this image on those grounds. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:57, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is critically important in that it helps in being educational to the reader by helping them get an understanding of the topic of the films pop culture legacy by using an illustrative example.Giantdevilfish (talk) 19:48, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Nom ignored discussion of image and image topic in article prose. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:When You Dish Upon a Star.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:When You Dish Upon a Star.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CTF83! (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wedding for Disaster.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wedding for Disaster.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Theleftorium (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete I don't see that this image tells me much, other than that Marge's hairdo makes a bridal veil a bit of a project. Mangoe (talk) 16:53, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HABF04.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HABF04.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fizan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete Homer and Bart annoyed at each other in the car: how often has that happened? Mangoe (talk) 16:51, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Worst Episode Ever.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Worst Episode Ever.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:52, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete I don't see how this tells us something that the text doesn't already say. Mangoe (talk) 16:50, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BurnsShot.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BurnsShot.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:52, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete I don't see that there's anything about this image that tells me something I don't see from the text. Mangoe (talk) 16:48, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Viva Ned Flanders.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viva Ned Flanders.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Queenieacoustic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:52, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • weak delete I don't see how this image tells us much that the narrative doesn't. Mangoe (talk) 16:46, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Weekend at Burnsie's.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weekend at Burnsie's.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thardin12 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wild Barts Can't Be Broken.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wild Barts Can't Be Broken.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Registered user 92 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scorpio with Bont.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 01:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scorpio with Bont.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:54, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The image helps illustrate a key moment and concept of the episode which is discussed at length in the article (that Homer is always ignorant of Scorpio's actions), and the image does help with the readers' understanding. -- Scorpion0422 20:14, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Response There is nothing about Bont's design in the article and the passage about Scorpio's design simply says that he wasn't designed to look like Richard Branson. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:51, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "It is a common misconception that Scorpio's design was modeled after Richard Branson, which it was not.[4] The final design, which underwent an overhaul, was hailed by the writers as "the perfect madman".[9]" Theleftorium (talk) 17:13, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Response Then this image should be moved to that portion of the text and a freely-licensed photo of Branson should be applied for comparison. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:51, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If it's that simple, then why did you bother nominating this image in the first place? Oh right, you didn't bother checking before you did that. -- Scorpion0422 20:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Nom ignored discussion of image and image topic in article prose. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep OK< this time I can see which Bond movie is being spoofed even without the text. It's educational. Mangoe (talk) 16:44, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Norman&Goodthighs.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norman&Goodthighs.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scorpion0422 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:54, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Game of Pool.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Game of Pool.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--this image is used decoratively rather than critically and readers' understanding would not be significantly diminished with its deletion. Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. (NFCC#8) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:56, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "It's decorative" is not a valid argument. The editor must specify why this image specifically does not belong in the article. --Maitch (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Subhasree Ganguly.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Subhasree Ganguly.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bhaskarwp (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Image of BLP with unclear source information and a watermark in the image. Tito Dutta (talk) 09:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Checkmark.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Checkmark.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fishman343 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File recently went through PUF due to uncertain copyright status, and was closed as no consensus. I am now submitting it for outright deletion due to its uncertain copyright status, and also since, if we lose this image, it won't be any major loss due to lots of other green checkmarks available to us. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:27, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RAW Test - small - Nikon D300.png

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Can't move this to Commons because of the copyrighted labels on the containers, and can't use it here for the same reason. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:14, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RAW Test - small - Nikon D300.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gcardinal (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value. Image is a photo of some video games and some food/beverage products with no correlation. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution, not a lot of foreseeable use. If you want to move it go ahead, I still think it has no use here and aught to be deleted. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:54, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, if they want to upload useless junk to WMC so be it. As long as it's not copyrighted, that's fine. --Nathan2055talk - contribs 04:27, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:McLachlan Talent Agency.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:McLachlan Talent Agency.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scott57 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image is a logo for an non-notable talent agency. Image possibly falls under PD-text but has no encyclopedic calue. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:27, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ricky Dominguez.jpg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ricky Dominguez.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scott57 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image of non-notable person. No encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:28, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2012_November_18&oldid=1088114833"