October 3
edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:37, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RTSAM2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Brotherreuse (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
essentially equivalent to the Commons image of the same name (commons:File:RTSAM2.jpg); ineligible for F8 as there are minor retouching differences. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:52, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:37, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Never Mind The Bollocks, Warner Bros.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hellobeatle (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Pink variant of the yellow album-cover of Never Mind the Bollocks, Here's the Sex Pistols. Does not meet WP:NFCC #3a —indopug (talk) 08:48, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:37, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Grey's Anatomy 4x1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
A television screenshot of three characters staring at each other - does not at all help me understand the article. — M.Mario (T/C) 15:55, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Archimedes pi.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Leszek Krupinski (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This does not show Archimedes' method for finding Pi. Archimedes method is described at http://www.delphiforfun.org/programs/Math_Topics/Archimedes_PI.htm. It involved using regular hexagons and doubling the number of sides each, it did not involve a sucession of regular pentagon, hexagon, octagon Sceptic1954 (talk) 20:21, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.