Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 March 24

< March 23	March 25 >

March 24

File:Img23681mj.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 00:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bàba Māma Ling.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not suitable FUR for a list of characters. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:05, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question - why do you say "visual identification of characters in question" is not a suitable FUR? Diego (talk) 11:52, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IIRC, that is acceptable in articles about particular characters, but not in "list of character" articles. Otherwise you'd end up with 50 non-free images in each such article. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:06, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't make much sense. Each image should be independently assessed for whether it satisfies the WP:NFCC. If each image is used for the valid purpose of identifying the character, it shouldn't matter that the characters are in the same or separate pages. IIRC there's nothing in the NFC limiting the use of many non-free images in the same page for different purposes. An encyclopedia is meant to be exhaustive; including only "some" of the characters would be akin to acknowledging they're included for decorative purposes. Diego (talk) 07:18, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why are images of these characters important to my understanding of the topic and why is that understanding impaired by an absence of this image? Is there something about their appearance that if I don't see it, I won't understand? Is this moment a seminal moment in the series and if I don't see a photo of this moment, I won't get it? --B (talk) 19:16, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nicolas and Cassandra Dawson.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not suitable FUR for a character list. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:06, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Irish bacon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low quality. Kelly ^hi! 01:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HIFA2015 Logo Clearer Version.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:11, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, vector version available (File:HIFA2015.svg). kashmiri 10:53, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hornbach1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Simply put: I don't trust the uploader's assurance that it is own work, given the small size of the image and the uploader's apparently bad history concerning uploaded images (have a look at his talk page). I tried a web search to find this image on a website prior to its upload here, but was not successful. On Commons, I'd propose deletion per the precautionary principle—not sure how this is handled here. Rosenzweig (talk) 13:14, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted - based on comparing this image with the user's other photos, I agree that it's unlikely the license is authentic. --B (talk) 02:06, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Listening to SBJ upon entry Mass Pike.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, but a local image description page exists. If you are wanting the image deleted, please nominate it for deletion on Commons. If you are requesting deletion of the local image description page only, use {{db-nofile}} if possible; if that is not possible, list it at WP:MFD. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:10, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image is a joke, no information, see inclusion on Sweet Baby James (song) E-Kartoffel (talk) 13:35, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep. It's not a joke. It's accurate and it's used to illustrate the article about the song, one whose most famous lines is quoted in the article. See for example this Boston Globe article: "'I really did drive the turnpike from Stockbridge to Boston,' he said, referencing a famous line in his song, 'Sweet Baby James.' I have a real connection to this place." The line is referenced in lots of other places, see for example this story or this story or this headline or this travel book and so forth. It's hard enough to find images that illustrate song articles, and this one shows signs for both destinations (one of the few places on the Pike where that happens). I don't see any reason for throwing this one out. Wasted Time R (talk) 13:46, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FFS Curie.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by File:The Royal Navy during the Second World War A18839.jpg, of better quality (ineligible for speedy deletion because it is a different crop) Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As the original uploader I have no problem with this deletion. Speedy it by all means. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 19:15, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IWM - B 5198.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by File:The British Army in Normandy 1944 B5198.jpg, of better quality (ineligible for speedy deletion because it is a different crop) Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:34, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kmart logo 2013.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:11, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

[[:File:]]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Erroneous Nomination. No image name is specified. Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:FFD or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:29, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[[:File:]] ([{{fullurl:File:|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3AFiles+for+deletion%2F2013+March+24%23File%3A%5D%5D}} delete] | [[File talk:|talk]] | [{{fullurl:File:|action=history}} history] | links | logs) – uploaded by [[User talk:User: Kvasir1814#File: listed for deletion|User: Kvasir1814]] ([{{fullurl:User talk:User: Kvasir1814|action=edit&preload=Template:Fdw_preload&editintro=Template:Fdw_editintro&section=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify] | [[Special:Contributions/User: Kvasir1814|contribs]] | [[Special:ListFiles/User: Kvasir1814|uploads]] | [[Special:Log/upload/User: Kvasir1814|upload log]]).

This image is far outdated and inaccurate. PrairieKid (talk) 20:35, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Promotional photo for Paul McCartney's "Out There! Tour".png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is essentially just a photo of Paul McCartney. It is unclear in what way its removal would be detrimental to the understanding of the article. Seems to fail WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-unplanned-mixtape-alternative.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to File:The-unplanned-mixtape-by-macklemore.jpg. Fails WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 (talk) 21:17, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. Both are distinct releases, not just a gimmick to attract public attention as one release is for the five track shorter EP, whereas the other (alternative) is for the longer 10 track album mixtape. werldwayd (talk) 21:25, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same image, just a different background. The background differences aren't discussed in the article, so they fail WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:29, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, the blue cover is actually the "official" one in almost all releases and has been adapted as "theee" version. That's the copy I do have myself. I have no objection to deleting the green cover. werldwayd (talk) 21:37, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete one of them They are substantially similar, so there is no valid FUR. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.