Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 June 26

June 26

File:Josh Duggar mugshot.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate use of mugshot photo that fails WP:NFC#UUI for living persons. But they discussed at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 73#Non-free images of still living persons convicted of a crime yet only incarcerated for a comparatively short period of time. Absolutiva 08:07, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; the image fails WP:NFCC #1; the subject is still alive, not incarcerated for life, and a free license image of him already exists (File:Joshua Duggar 2007 cropped and retouched.jpg) on the article of the subject at Josh Duggar. Unless this booking photo was the subject of discussion by reliable, secondary sources, there just isn't any reason to retain this image. The source noted for the image claims the image is in the public ___domain but that is provably false, as this discussion on Commons noted, and that discussion closed as delete. The image is not the property of the Encyclopedia of Arkansas (EoA), but the property of the Washington County Sheriff's Office, which does not have the image available under a free license. A mugshot is not public ___domain by default, as the EoA seems to think. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:08, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hailey Baldwin Bieber.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very very simple. No proof that it is copyright free. Evidence is needed that this is copyright free. If copyright free, I would suggest Keep, if it is not, then just Speedy Delete in discussion to get in done. P.S., I was quite tired at time of nominating this for deletion, so if I said anything wrong, that is probably why. Anyways, back to the point I made. Let's find evidence and either Keep or Speedy Delete. Servite et contribuere (talk) 14:05, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hailey Bieber.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very very simple. No proof that it is copyright free. Evidence is needed that this is copyright free. If copyright free, I would suggest Keep, if it is not, then just Speedy Delete in discussion to get in done. P.S., I was quite tired at time of nominating this for deletion, so if I said anything wrong, that is probably why. Anyways, back to the point I made. Let's find evidence and either Keep or Speedy Delete. (And yes, I did copy and paste what I said in proposed deletion of another file) Servite et contribuere (talk) 14:06, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rina Sawayama - Hold the Girl (1st Anniversary Edition).jpeg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:22, 5 July 2025 (UTC) This is a duplicate of File:Rina Sawayama - Hold the Girl (song).png. For the first anniversary of the album, Rina replaced the original Hold the Girl artwork on streaming platforms with that of the title track, which had been released as a single prior to the album. It is important that this artwork be on the album's article because it has been the primary digital artwork since 2023. Considering that the file is non-free, it seems inappropriate in my opinion to have two versions of it on Wikipedia. Furthermore, it is my understanding that PNG files are preferred for album covers. Though it is not required, the fact is that a PNG version is available in this specific case. I am aware that duplicates are typically not within the scope of this page, but the reason I am bringing the situation here is because I tried to change the artwork on the Hold the Girl article from Hold the Girl (1st Anniversary Edition).jpeg to Hold the Girl (song).png. I figured it would simply allow the former to expire after some time due to not being used in an article, but it was reverted by a bot due to "lack of rationale for non-free file". Assuming that Hold the Girl (1st Anniversary Edition).jpeg is deleted for duplicate reasons, what would be the correct way to make the bot understand that Hold the Girl (song).png can also be used for the article about the album? Thank you. Bizarre Bizarre^{Talk modern to me} 21:18, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and do not add File:Rina Sawayama - Hold the Girl (song).png to the album article. Per WP:NFC#UUI#6, if a non-free image is already present in another article, simply link to it. A caption can be added to the song article and explain this the single cover was later used as the album cover. ✗plicit 00:25, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The file was not tagged until now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:22, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Times front page, 24 September 2012.jpeg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:43, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFC#UUI, criterion 15: An image of a newspaper article or other publication that contains long legible sections of copyrighted text. If the text is important as a source or quotation, it should be worked into the Wikipedia article in textual form, with a citation to the newspaper article. Absolutiva 23:38, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kimberly Potter jail booking photo December 23 2021.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Pppery (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:06, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFC#UUI, criterion 1: Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. However, it does not affect life sentence for mugshots. Absolutiva 23:43, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - she's already out of prison. PARAKANYAA (talk) 11:56, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Derek Chauvin mugshot April 2021.webp

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:42, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFC#UUI, criterion 1: Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. However, it does not affect life sentence for mugshots. Absolutiva 23:44, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the last time I tried to FfD this. If someone has a life sentence it is reasonable to expect we cannot get a free image in their lifetime - Chauvin will mostly likely get out while he is alive. He is not a lifer. PARAKANYAA (talk) 11:50, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.