Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Flaming Pie/1

< Wikipedia:Good article reassessment

Flaming Pie

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:49, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The entire "Archive Collection reissue" section is uncited, as well as other uncited statements in the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:57, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I volunteer to help fix this. The original nominator is a friend of mine, but he is on vacation and thus not willing to come out of retirement to fix it. mftp dan oops 16:18, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Aside from this brief statement: "the critical reaction to Flaming Pie was strong, with McCartney achieving his best reviews since 1982's Tug of War", the article lacks actual critical reviews too (aside from scores). – zmbro (talk) (cont) 20:31, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd also integrate "Album title" into another section, as per MOS:OVERSECTION. Additionally, the Personnel section there doesn't specify track duties (see WP:PERSONNEL), although I know for sure those are in the liner notes. I'll volunteer to help with that one, as it's something I routinely do anyway. The Keymaster (talk) 02:07, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There's been a lot of debate recently about whether or not the inclusion of deluxe editions and copious bonus tracks is warranted in most cases, so an argument could be made that that section should just be removed, which would fix that problem. The Keymaster (talk) 02:10, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Heads up to everyone, I intend to fix this article tonight. When I'm finished, let me know if there's anything else I need to address or if I need additional refinement. mftp dan oops 20:48, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, are you fixing this article? Newtatoryd222 (talk) 14:58, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have been busier than expected, but by morning it should be close, if not completely repaired. mftp dan oops 02:03, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have now added a substantial amount to reception. There is a little more to be done, and some re-organizing, but that should not be difficult. I am going to get some sleep and will resume in the daylight. mftp dan oops 05:43, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So, before I proceed with the Archive Collection heading, I need clarification. Are these tracklists even pertinent? I know how alternate tracklists, especially for reissues, have been covered on Wikipedia has recently come under scrutiny and some changes have been made, but I've not kept up and would like some explanation on just how much I have to source, or if there's any I ought to remove. mftp dan oops 05:18, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Z1720, could you please answer the query, thanks. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:32, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • @MFTP Dan: Sorry that I did not respond to this sooner. This is a tough one for me to answer, as I think most albums have track listings and extra additions usually do not have so many extra songs. I think the information about the different editions might be too detailed and promotional. As for listing all the tracks, that might be a good question for WP:WPMUSIC or WP:ALBUM. Z1720 (talk) 13:11, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Flaming_Pie/1&oldid=1306949687"