Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Distance effects in Survivalcraft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Right now, the only editors not supporting Deletion are the article creators. They will have to find another website to host their unencyclopedic content. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:09, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Distance effects in Survivalcraft

Draft:Distance effects in Survivalcraft (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​

This doesn't appear to be something that will ever become an actual article. WP:NOTWEBHOST Onorem (talk) 01:45, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Wikiuser333333323.

Soledad Mamani 2 (talk) 01:52, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is not a web host. Is a normal regular draft article Soledad Mamani 2 (talk) 01:54, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per someone who hasn't commented? How does that make sense? --Onorem (talk) 01:55, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't known about this... Bye bye. Discussion is closed. Soledad Mamani 2 (talk) 01:59, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This draft has zero chance of ever becoming an article, per WP:NOT. It looks like the only reason this draft is here is because the contributor(s) were trying to put similar content over on minecraft.wiki (See [1]) but they were reverted, the page protected, and the accounts blocked for sockpuppetry. - MrOllie (talk) 02:04, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Is my draft article but do not delete. Please keep the article. Wikiuser333333323 (talk) 02:10, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Wikiuser333333323, do not vandalize other people's comments, as you just tried to do to mine. - MrOllie (talk) 02:21, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Its 2:36 AM, now go to sleep. Wikiuser333333323 (talk) 02:35, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: The above editors (not MrOllie) appear to be meatpuppets and appear to be WP:NOTHERE. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikiuser333333323. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:11, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I am not a meatpuppet. Wikiuser333333323 (talk) 14:27, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep at this time. I have not seen a reason to delete or keep a draft:
  • Zero chance of becoming an article is not a reason to delete a draft. Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity. If we start deleting drafts for zero chance of becoming drafts, well-meaning editors will be encouraged to submit drafts for deletion and will clog MFD, as discussed in Leave Useless Drafts Alone.
  • Wikipedia is not for web hosting is the basis for U5, which applies to user space. This is a draft, and drafts are a use of the Wiki servers for a Wikipedia function.
  • Internet sockpuppetry on other systems is not normally a concern for Wikipedia. There has not been a sockpuppet investigation on Wikipedia.
  • Vandalism of this deletion discussion is a serious matter, but is a conduct issue, and MFD is a content forum.
  • I am ready to change this to Delete if a reason to delete a draft is provided. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:57, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  There has been an SPI filed, and processed. The finding that it was more likely to be meatpuppetry than socking. Tenshi! (Talk page) 12:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE apply everywhere, not just to user space. Plenty of stuff gets deleted without qualifying for speedy deletion - if we only deleted stuff that qualified for speedy there would be no need to have MFD at all. MrOllie (talk) 14:34, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  My draft article i created is not a game guide. Wikiuser333333323 (talk) 14:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Drafts aren't checked for notability or sanity, though if addition of material not compatible with our license continues, it likely should be taken to ANI . Tenshi! (Talk page) 12:51, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I don't think that the authors intend to try and publish this to mainspace seriously whatsoever, and given the disruptive edits and the persistent copyright violations, its best to Delete this here before said authors end up in a copyright & NOTHERE block. Tenshi! (Talk page) 16:12, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete appears to likely be a draft of a page for some other wiki, so WP:NOTWEBHOST may apply. This draft seems to be creator’s exclusive editing interest and a few disruptive or borderline disruptive edits, so WP:NOTHERE may also apply. TruenoCity (talk) 14:03, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Question - I have a question for the editors who are coordinating to keep this draft, especially since you are pleading to keep this draft. What is the purpose of this draft? Do you plan to add sources to it and submit it for review to become an article? If not, why do you want to keep it in draft space? Robert McClenon (talk) 16:18, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I want my draft article don't get deleted. Wikiuser333333323 (talk) 17:51, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The creator left a edit summary that is questionable in terms of civility here, I have told them about this on their talk page. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 20:37, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted my draft page. Do not remove my draft page until it publishes to Wikipedia. Wikiuser333333323 (talk) 22:45, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. OR with no chance of notability. There is hardly any chance it would even merit mention in the main article. Due to author's/authors' persistent NOTHERE/CLUE/MEAY editing, best to just delete it now. —  HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK 16:01, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Seems like a WP:NOTWEBHOST violation, WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE, and the strange editing by some editors make me think this should be deleted. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 00:34, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Draft has been rejected, user has expressed intent to quit Wikipedia as a result. I'm inclined to leave the draft and let G13 take over unless there is a case of tendatious resubmission, but I don't feel strongly enough to even !vote weak keep. — 🪫Volatile ^{📲T | ⌨️C} 21:32, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.