Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:OpenCart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. (NACArmbrust The Homunculus 05:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:OpenCart (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

[NOTE]: Article has been deleted five times already. JustBerry (talk) 21:45, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Pro-forma. JustBerry, AFC's purpose is to help submissions get to the point that they can be promoted to mainspace, of course the submission is going to be needing more improvement. WP:G13 is the CSD that revolves around AFC stale submissions. Please review the purpose of WP:DRAFT and WP:AFC. I don't see any of the other CSD rationale as appicable, so it makes sense to give this article space Hasteur (talk) 00:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - The first three deletes were of a couple of unsourced sentences. The fourth try was a copy of another company's article, and the last was a cut-down version of the fourth. This draft is an improvement, and I have added a number of software reviews and comparisons, which I found without difficulty on the web. —Anne Delong (talk) 03:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep In this particular case, since Anne Delong is working on it, there is no possible rationale for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 23:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.