Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User css-N (2nd nomination)

Template:User css-N

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) Techie3 (talk) 11:00, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) bibliomaniac 1 5 23:55, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The text in this userbox is almost identical to Template:User css-4, which indicates expert knowledge. The "-N" templates for programming languages have long been treated as a joke, since the "native speaker" wording is not really applicable to them. The associated categories have already been deleted multiple times — see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 January 12#c-Timrollpickering-2012-01-21T01:56:00.000Z-Category:User_pas-N. I believe the appropriate solution is to replace all uses with "User css-4" and either delete this template or reclassify it as a joke template, as an analogous ones (Template:User pas-N and similar in Category:Humorous user templates) still exist. Solidest (talk) 08:43, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment In case someone missed the title of this page, there was a previous nomination of this at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User css-N. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 02:54, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Replace all uses with Template:User css-4 and then Delete per nom; I find Black Falcon's "redirect" !vote in the 2010 discussion much more convincing than the "keep"s there. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:36, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac 1 5 23:55, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Try relisting again
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Techie3 (talk) 11:00, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; do what Pppery said. Rationale per nom.—Alalch E. 14:54, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 07:48, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]