Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cysinger/Scaje

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Tim Song (talk) 04:06, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cysinger/Scaje

This article could not pass any of the notability guidelines, and has in fact been deleted pursuant to an AfD discussion. It cannot be allowed to stay in user space indefinitely per WP:NOTWEBHOST. ^Bongo_matic 20:38, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree that the decision to userfy was the correct one - having read the AfD, there was a chance that notability could be achieved (slight, but still a chance). However, after six months, I see no evidence of improvement, and almost no evidence of any changes, so it is time to remove it. Presumably, the band name was supposed to chnage to Eternal Flame, but no update on that rumor is evident in the article.--SPhilbrick T 01:09, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE says, "While userpages and subpages can be used as a development ground for generating new content, this space is not intended to indefinitely archive your preferred version of disputed or previously deleted content or indefinitely archive permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia." (mine emphasized)
This userspace copy has been created by a single-purpose account whose sole purpose is to promote the subject of the article; no other edits outside of this topic have been made from this account. This userspace draft of a previously deleted article about a non-notable individual violates the policy WP:NOTWEBHOST and should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 07:31, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I consider the "userfy" close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scaje to be a "delete", in that it is deleted from the mainspace. Cunard (talk) 07:31, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No realistic chance of the subject becoming notable in the near future, so does not belong in userspace per WP:NOTWEBHOST. Nsk92 (talk) 02:22, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.