Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Expewikiwriter/Test Page

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. — ξ ^xplicit 00:55, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Expewikiwriter/Test Page

One of the promotional pages created by User:Expewikiwriter, who is now known to be a sockmaster paid group account. I'd actually suggest we delete all pages undder http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=prefix%3AUser%3AExpewikiwriter%2F&title=Special%3ASearch - but this is the only one with significant content.

This page looks to be a mix of article content and not ready to go live, and as such is a sandbox.[1] Since it was only editted recently, I would say keep in case user managed to become unblocked in the next year. In any case blanking would suite our purposes, in hiding any promotion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is it even slightly likely for a paid group account sockmaster to get unblocked? 86.** IP (talk) 13:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blank at least. Do we usually delete it sockmaster-paid-group-account subpages? I don't know, but am leaning to say "Delete all". I have asked the blocking admin at User_talk:JamesBWatson#User:Expewikiwriter_subpages. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:16, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not to be used for promotion. And yes, it is highly unlikely this user will be unblocked. MER-C 02:46, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.