Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Legolas2186

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Blanked and tagged. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:06, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Legolas2186

It may be a good idea to delete this user page so that new editors will not follow this user's footsteps. sst✈^(discuss) 08:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What policy does this user page violate that requires it to be deleted. -- Whpq (talk) 19:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Content that brings the project into disrepute. sst✈^(discuss) 00:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - You will need to explain further as I don't see what that content is. -- Whpq (talk) 00:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. If I remember rightly, the user engaged in an extensive pattern of hoaxing, using fabricated sources to add deceptive content to lots of articles. However, that's no reason to delete his userpage. Nyttend (talk) 14:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I see no violation of user page policy, and the nominator has not provided any specifics as to what content on the user page is bringing the project into disrepute. -- Whpq (talk) 18:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Replace entire page with {{Template:Blocked user}} (or any other similar templated text closing admin finds appropriate). We don't need to maintain shrines for indef. blocked vandals in their userpage forever. jni ^(delete)_{...just not interested} 17:00, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.