Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Shivprasad1966/sandbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete as promotional content under WP:G11. RL0919 (talk) 04:41, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shivprasad1966/sandbox

Business promotional draft relying mainly on self-sourcing, passing mentions, and Wikipedia links. No indication of notability. Blue Riband► 16:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - It's a draft. Notability is not an issue in draft space. Nominator appears to be ragpicking. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Some of the content appears to be copyright-infringing: [1]. However, since the whole draft is not blatant copy-paste from one (or several) links, G12 would not apply. Once the infringing content is removed and revdeleted, I'd go with a weak keep as well – either it will be improved or G13 will eventually take care of it. ComplexRational (talk) 18:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Infringing content removed and RD1 requested. ComplexRational (talk) 19:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, possibly speedy per G11/G12. Spam article full of copyvios. Even with the copyrevdels completed the article is still full of copyvio material, e.g. the first remaining sentence of the "Products" section is copied from another website. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 15:30, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Copyvio concerns have been addressed. Notability / promotional tone etc. concerns don't apply to drafts. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 03:00, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
These can apply if there are more problemic contents within drafts, and just, this particular one is an example. Just image if someone created a draft contain a lot of pro-Putin contents, then it's highly possible that a random user supports Putin Huilo will saw it full of unacceptable and more than nonsense+gibberish, but if we call that user "Hey notability-related SD tags can't apply to drafts", then what else we can help the later user to avoid their hurt-like-hell? Be smart and be bold to nominate SD for drafts. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PerfectSoundWhatever Concerns about spam apply everywhere, G11 is a general criteria that applies to every page in the project, regardless of namespace. The copyvio concerns also haven't been resolved, huge chunks of this article have been copied from the companies website, just with "we" swapped for "they" [2]. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 10:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the copyvio was addressed when I wrote my !vote, but the editor reinstated it. I've removed it again and added redvel. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 20:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
it's still full of copyvio material [3]. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 11:36, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Even though G12 or G13 won't apply, {{db-G11}} applies. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:11, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a G11. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 00:34, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - drafts don't need to be notable, as pointed out, but it should indeed qualify for G11 — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.