Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bathroom emergency pullstring
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was keep. BencherliteTalk 11:33, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bathroom emergency pullstring (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Tinton5 (talk) 03:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- On what grounds do you want the AFD page deleted? --Jayron32 04:38, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- This looks like a G7 deletion author requests deletion of their own creation. When nominated no one else had edited, but they have now, so all we can do is a speedy close and not delete. I would suggest that Tinton5 puts on a note at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bathroom emergency pullstring that the AFD is withdrawn. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Actually it is a double G7 case, wrote Bathroom emergency pullstring then nominated Bathroom emergency pullstring for deletion and then changed his mind, and nominated the (nomination for deletion) for deleton and removed link from article. Yes so we should keep the AFD and hopefully speedy close it as withdrawn. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- This looks like a G7 deletion author requests deletion of their own creation. When nominated no one else had edited, but they have now, so all we can do is a speedy close and not delete. I would suggest that Tinton5 puts on a note at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bathroom emergency pullstring that the AFD is withdrawn. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- The AfD should be kept as a record of the discussion that happened, however brief that discussion was. Achowat (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep because this is too meta. Also, per this discussion, nobody filled out an RFP for this, so we need to close it. --NYKevin @910, i.e. 20:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep no compelling reason given; talk/discussion pages are rarely if ever deleted. OSborn arfcontribs. 23:17, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.