Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Editing Under the Influence
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was No consensus. Althugh it occurs to me that the perceived problems could be fixed through editing. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:44, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
This page has got a little out of hand. Perhaps time to start afresh? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 03:05, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Agree it's time to start over. Hydnjo's little fun essay has become ridiculous now. And of course if it doesn't have the_undertow's classic contribution to the art File:Anxietyonwiki.jpg it will always be editorially lacking. Franamax (talk) 03:18, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Userfy - Per the WP:ESSAYS policy, essays are the opinion or advice of an editor or group of editors. Since Editing Under the Influence has (or does not have enough) opinion or advise and has moved far away from either, userfy to a subpage of a user that wouldn't mind hosting the page (perhaps ask significant contributors to the page, such as User:hydnjo or User:AstroHurricane001). -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:08, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Reasonable start to a very important essay. In some ways it is too serious to be funny. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:17, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. WP gone wild! Contributions have gone waaay beyond the intent of the originator as a result of his invitation to do so. The original (and succinct) essay is maintained here. hydnjo (talk) 15:48, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.