Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Tenacious D

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep ^demon^{[omg plz]} 19:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tenacious D

Sorry, guys, but we really do not need an entire Wikiproject devoted to one act. Wikipedia is not a fansite or MySpace.

We already have Wikipedia:WikiProject The KLF, Wikipedia:WikiProject Pink Floyd, Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. Those wikiprojects have been very productive in getting the articles, related to corresponding groups to FA or GA status. I don't see any reason why this wikiproject should be nipped in the bud, when it can, potentially, improve Tenacious D articles significantly. Grue 12:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above. We do not have a need for this project.--James, La gloria è a dio 21:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I even had to find out what this is all about so I am not involved. There are more partcipants than on many Projects and there are quite a few articles that it covers. I see no reason to delete. If the participants need it, why not? --Bduke 01:38, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Enough articles fall under it to warrant centralized collaboration. It's not particularly active but it has only been 3 months and there are plenty of members. –Pomte 02:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The project is not being abused as a WP space fansite. As long as they're working in the Wikipedia spirit to improve the place, I can't possibly see the problem. All of the projects are collections of Wikipedians with common interests and hobbies. I see no reason to single out one or the other as improper because of the project's topic. To me, that's the absolutely wrong measuring stick to use. Vassyana 04:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Many editors on it, we have WikiProjects on other bands. Ab e g92contribs 18:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It seems fine to me, and anyway, per above "Keep" voters. Ry Guy 12:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.