The following discussions related to article topics are requested to have community-wide attention:
You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions of interest to you, see Wikipedia:Feedback request service (refresh)
We have existing consensus to change the lead image; however, the previous discussion on what the new image should be was scuppered by copyright concerns.
Should File:Queen Elizabeth II March 2015.jpg (right) be used as the lead image, or something else? If you have an alternate suggestion of a good-quality image without copyright concerns, please add it to the bulleted list below.
I let the discussion cool off for a bit as it was getting heated and thought of the best possible compromise that still stays within WP:NPOV. This is my proposed neutral solution, in broad terms:
Lady Gaga performed a free concert at Copacabana Beach, Rio de Janeiro, which became the most-attended concert by a female artist with an estimated audience of over 2.1 million people.[a]
Since my proposed image has been reverted multiple times now without explanation, I figured I should start this section on the talk page to discuss it.
The image I propose, a contemporary one mentioned by the Historical Society of Pennsylvania
Alternative one from the 1870s similar to the contemporary one
We have existing consensus to change the lead image; however, the previous discussion on what the new image should be was scuppered by copyright concerns.
Should File:Queen Elizabeth II March 2015.jpg (right) be used as the lead image, or something else? If you have an alternate suggestion of a good-quality image without copyright concerns, please add it to the bulleted list below.
I am opening an RFC regarding which version of the lede should be used for this article. The question is whether the film's overt racism should be foregrounded before its technical innovations, and whether editorial [dubious – discuss] tags belong in the lede. Tito Omburo (talk) 22:34, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
This RFC is a pseudo-continuation of a discussion at the Central Texas floods article. Points were brought up about the inclusion of sections relating to climate change in severe weather articles in general. However, the RFC did not find consensus for that. As a result, I am opening this RFC. Articles affected include those on specific hurricanes, flood events, tornadoes, et cetera. ✶Quxyz✶22:00, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
This RFC is a pseudo-continuation of a discussion at the Central Texas floods article. Points were brought up about the inclusion of sections relating to climate change in severe weather articles in general. However, the RFC did not find consensus for that. As a result, I am opening this RFC. Articles affected include those on specific hurricanes, flood events, tornadoes, et cetera. ✶Quxyz✶22:00, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
I am opening an RFC regarding which version of the lede should be used for this article. The question is whether the film's overt racism should be foregrounded before its technical innovations, and whether editorial [dubious – discuss] tags belong in the lede. Tito Omburo (talk) 22:34, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
I let the discussion cool off for a bit as it was getting heated and thought of the best possible compromise that still stays within WP:NPOV. This is my proposed neutral solution, in broad terms:
Lady Gaga performed a free concert at Copacabana Beach, Rio de Janeiro, which became the most-attended concert by a female artist with an estimated audience of over 2.1 million people.[b]
The lede of the article currently states that “Most critics gave it a negative review, with multiple finding it to be the worst entry in the Star Trek franchise.” There has been some contention about whether this is appropriate or accurate for the lede of the article, but discussion on the talk page ended with no clear resolution. Seeking a broader idea of what is appropriate here. I would also like a consensus to exist next time someone tries to make a change in either direction; I am not referring to the issue of whether the phrase should be in the article at all, here, though that is another relevant question. Tduk (talk) 18:15, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
On May 6, 2025, Salt Lake City Council adopted three new flags, alongside its previous flag, to circumvent Utah state law prohibiting non-federal, state or municipal flags being flown by government authorities, available to view in Flags of Salt Lake City. Should they also be included in the infobox? Coleisforeditor (talk) 18:14, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
There have been conflicting RfCs in recent years that have thrown up different results. Let's drill down and discuss a workable solution, especially considering the potential to show changes over time. Quinby (talk) 08:34, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Do the highest-quality reliable sources best describe a völkisch nationalist party that has an ethno-cultural definition of Germanness, a relatively mainstream right-wing populist and national conservative party analogous to Reform UK, or a neo-fascist party that should be described similar to Die Heimat? There is little controversy over the inclusion of euroscepticism. The results of this RFC will therefore not indicate support for removal for it.
We have existing consensus to change the lead image; however, the previous discussion on what the new image should be was scuppered by copyright concerns.
Should File:Queen Elizabeth II March 2015.jpg (right) be used as the lead image, or something else? If you have an alternate suggestion of a good-quality image without copyright concerns, please add it to the bulleted list below.
Sorry for the poor title, its the best i could think of and have no issue with someone making a better one.
IP 69.156.104.108 and me + JJNITO are at an impasse regarding 3 sources used for the claim in the ideology section in the infobox that the SSNP adheres to fascist ideology. I removed 3 sources used in the section because I believe they did not actually adquietly explain why they are fascist and merely used it a pejorative term and/or just as a truism, you can see my arguments above.
I cannot convince 69.156.104.108 that the sources are flawed and they are stating that I am Sealioning and missunderstanding what makes something a reliable source. this argument has gone in circle for days and we need an outside opinion. AssanEcho (talk) 22:06, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Can we include the following paragraph on the page?
"On 4 June 2024, it was reported by the website DeSmog that Reform UK had accepted "more than £2.3 million from oil and gas interests, highly polluting industries, and climate science deniers since December 2019".[11]"
Should the lead provide context that states have rescinded their recognition of the SADR? Possible wordings with/without context include:
Option A: The Polisario Front is primarily supported by Algeria and has won formal recognition for the SADR from 46 UN member states and South Ossetia, and membership in the African Union.
Option B: The Polisario Front is primarily supported by Algeria has won formal recognition for the SADR from 84 UN member states and membership in the African Union.
Option C: The Polisario Front is primarily supported by Algeria and has won limited international recognition for the SADR and membership in the African Union.
Option D: The Polisario Front is primarily supported by Algeria and has won formal recognition for the SADR from 84 UN member states—38 of which have cancelled, frozen, or suspended their recognition—and membership in the African Union.
Version A[1], While additional funding was made available for the county through the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, it was not used for flood warning and monitoring systems. It is unclear whether county officials were aware they could have used the funding for upgrades to their flood warning system. The area is very conservative politically, and many residents were opposed to using the funds for anything at all. Source.
Version B[2] While additional funding was made available for the county through the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, it was not used for flood warning and monitoring systems. At the time, some residents were opposed to using the funds for anything as they opposed the requirements attached to federal funds. It is unclear whether county officials were aware they could have used the funding for such upgrades.Source
Questions in dispute are
1) Should this mention political conservatism?
2) Should it include It is unclear whether county officials were aware they could have used the funding for upgrades to their flood warning system.
3) Is "some residents" or "many residents" more accurate.
Are you agree about having templates for indirect elections, with indirect elections entries are not included into templates which are part of Category:Election and referendum year templates?
On May 6, 2025, Salt Lake City Council adopted three new flags, alongside its previous flag, to circumvent Utah state law prohibiting non-federal, state or municipal flags being flown by government authorities, available to view in Flags of Salt Lake City. Should they also be included in the infobox? Coleisforeditor (talk) 18:14, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
^Local authorities and government figures, including the Mayor of Rio Eduardo Paes, estimated an audience of 2.1 to 2.2 million.[1][2]
However, Pollstar, Billboard, Rolling Stone, and multiple other reliable sources have reported an audience of 2.5 million.
[3][4][5]
^Local authorities and government figures, including the Mayor of Rio Eduardo Paes, estimated an audience of 2.1 to 2.2 million.[6][7]
However, Pollstar, Billboard, Rolling Stone, and multiple other reliable sources have reported an audience of 2.5 million.
[8][9][10]
^Torres, Mauricio; Ulloa, Christopher (2025-05-04). "2.1 million person crowd estimated at free Lady Gaga concert on Rio's Copacabana beach". CNN. Retrieved 2025-08-10. Guests started queuing from early Saturday morning to secure a good spot for the show, which is paid for by local authorities. Organizers said about 2.1 million revelers were estimated to have been in the crowd.
^Torres, Mauricio; Ulloa, Christopher (2025-05-04). "2.1 million person crowd estimated at free Lady Gaga concert on Rio's Copacabana beach". CNN. Retrieved 2025-08-10. Guests started queuing from early Saturday morning to secure a good spot for the show, which is paid for by local authorities. Organizers said about 2.1 million revelers were estimated to have been in the crowd.
Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
18th century illustration currently in use. GrandDuchyConti 💜(talk) 17:48, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
The image I propose, a contemporary one mentioned by the Historical Society of Pennsylvania
_(14598261899).jpg)
Alternative one from the 1870s similar to the contemporary one
18th century illustration currently in use. GrandDuchyConti 💜(talk) 17:48, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
