Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 December 5

December 5

Wheel of Fortune (disambiguation) → Wheel of Fortune

The result of the debate was speedy keep. --Gh87 06:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After switching their titles, this redirect page is useless as of right now. Does anyone want to type its title, anyways? --Gh87 07:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Redirects like this facilitate disambiguation by separating the intentional and unintentional links to the disambiguation page. Khatru2 20:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Khatru2 -- Renesis (talk) 02:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Dekimasu 01:28, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

wandering log → log-structured file system

The result of the debate was retargeted to journaling file system. --Gh87 07:46, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wandering logs (as in file system journaling) is unrelated to log-structured file systems -- intgr 22:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revoked: I'm redirecting the page to journaling file system instead.

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Socianism → Psilanthropism

The result of the debate was The redirect was deleted to be conducive to expansion. —Centrx→talk • 07:15, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is not necessary, as there is a page on socianism that is more complete than that on Psilanthropism.Amity150 22:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re-target to Socinianism. -- JLaTondre 19:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Expand. The article on Socinianism says to compare Socianism. This would imply that they are closely related topics, but apparently not identical; perhaps the difference is extremely subtle, but nevertheless merits a full article. Furthermore, if you re-target to socinianism you generate a self-referential redirect. 69.140.173.15 01:58, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Re-target to Socinianism and create a subsection on Socianism. If there is enough information added to the section, it can become its own article, but it can't be its own yet because there currently isn't any information on Socianism at all. Dar-Ape 04:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. More useful as a redlink. Really better to give it its own page than to redirect it anywhere. --- RockMFR 04:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Expand Expand both. These are apparently related concepts, but there is some substantial difference. The two terms are not used interchangeably. It would not be appropriate to merge Arianism and Unitarianism into one article either, or to redirect from one to the other. They are two different, but related, types of thought separated by almost 2000 years. Amity150 15:40, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.