Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 April 5

< April 4

April 6 >

April 5

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 5, 2009

Wikipedia:MYOB → Wikipedia:No personal attacks

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure how this relates to personal attacks, no pages link here, probably an unlikely search term. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 23:54, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• See MYOB for what it stands for. Uncle G (talk) 14:59, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Doesn't seem sufficiently relevant to warrant the link. --JaGa^talk 09:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wikipedia:MBAPAIYAEOAOSFBLTTB → Wikipedia:No personal attacks

The result of the discussion was delete. bibliomaniac15 04:30, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely and borderline nonsensical search term when looking for this policy page. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 23:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• That's fine with me. I honestly can't recall why I created it. -- Ned Scott 02:49, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, this is the edit you made immediately before. Ring any bells? --78.151.109.18 (talk) 15:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ah, now I remember. I'm still fine with deletion. -- Ned Scott 02:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Checking the history section for the redirect it stands for Might Be A Personal Attack If You Are Easily Offended And/Or Suffer From Blood Loss To The Brain which I doubt anyone would consider using the abervation of to find the page in question. Few people if any would find this useful. --76.66.184.94 (talk) 04:06, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete IP has it correct. Tavix |  Talk  22:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

!!!! → ! (disambiguation)

The result of the discussion was delete. bibliomaniac15 04:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Un-necessary page - see it's Talk page

Control-alt-delete ★ user◾talk◾contrib◾favs 22:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep A string of exclamation points can be commonly found in online chats, the funny pages, and other informal venues. The desire to determine if a string of multiple exclamation points has a different meaning than just a singular punctuation mark seems a reasonable query, making this a plausible search term. --Allen3 ^talk 11:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - unnecessary and an unlikely search string. Otto4711 (talk) 13:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• delete as unnecessary and unlikely. If this remains then perhaps there should be a !!!!! and !!!!!! too.PaulJones (talk) 15:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

A-ONE Textile & Towel industries → A1

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig. JaGa^talk 19:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

A-1 Communications, Inc. → A1

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• A-1 Communications → A1

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig. JaGa^talk 19:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

A-1 Auto Service → A1

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig. JaGa^talk 19:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

A-one noodles → A1

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig. JaGa^talk 19:50, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

A1 Motor Stores → A1

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig. JaGa^talk 19:49, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

A-1 Hotel → A1

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• A1 hotel → A1

• A-1 hotel → A1

• A-One Hotel → A1

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig. JaGa^talk 19:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

A-1 Supermarket → A1

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:23, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• A-one Supermarket → A1

• A1 Supermarket → A1

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig. JaGa^talk 19:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

A-One cotton factory → A1

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• A-1 cotton → A1

• A1 cotton → A1

• A-1 factory → A1

• A1 factory → A1

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig. JaGa^talk 19:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

A1 food → A1

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• A-1 food → A1

The closest I can find on the disambig corresponding to A1 food is the steak sauce, which makes this an unlikely redirect. JaGa^talk 19:31, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

A1 team → A1

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• A-1 team → A1

There are several A1 leagues, and some competitions, but no A1 team listed on the disambig, making this a misleading redirect. JaGa^talk 19:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Yes we can → Yes We Can

The result of the discussion was turn into a disambiguation page. bibliomaniac15 04:34, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, we can → Yes We Can

Re-target to Sí se puede. These redirects are the English translation of the Spanish political slogan that the music video they are currently redirecting to is based on. As a corollary I would argue that the slogan is more famous than the video. 78.146.29.221 (talk) 17:32, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose create a dab page instead, and target all the English language redirects there, hatnote the English titled article and the Spanish titled article. The third entry would be Obamamania. 76.66.193.69 (talk) 06:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• The fact that there are three headnotes on Yes We Can strongly indicates that disambiguation is the way to proceed. And that's not taking into account the above suggestion of a possible fourth conflicting redirect that would be here in the absence of any others. Uncle G (talk) 15:06, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• oppose and turn it into a disambiguation page. PaulJones (talk) 19:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep it exactly the way it is. Tavix |  Talk  22:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

"Business Motivation Model" → Business Motivation Model

The result of the discussion was delete. bibliomaniac15 04:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant Anshuk (talk) 08:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Redundant. — Gavia immer (talk) 13:17, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Agreed as redundant, created in error. Greyskinnedboy (talk) 23:14, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Ulitimate Edition → Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3

The result of the discussion was delete. bibliomaniac15 04:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per The original tagger's rationale on my talk page. NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 01:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete there are oh so many ultimate editions including MS Winddows and DOA 70.29.213.241 (talk) 05:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.