Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 June 5

< June 4

June 6 >

June 5

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 5, 2009

Thank God (song)

The result of the discussion was Re-targeted to Mindless Self Indulgence discography#Singles. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:25, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank God (song)Thank God (song) → Mindless Self Indulgence

The disambiguation makes the redirect an implausible search term. Tavix |  Talk  20:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete per nom or weak retarget to Mindless Self Indulgence discography#Singles. The parenthetical disambiguator makes the redirect less likely as a search term for most users, but it would still be a plausible search term for anyone familiar with Wikipedia article naming conventions. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 19:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• retarget as per Black Falcon. PaulJones (talk) 10:23, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wikipedia as TomeRaider database - download instructions

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:23, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia as TomeRaider database - download instructions → Wikipedia:TomeRaider database - download instructions

Cross-namespace redirect to an obsolete historical page that nobody is likely to be looking for. Although this is an old page, there's no useful history at the redirect. — Gavia immer (talk) 19:25, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete but since the pagemove history is not preserved in the page history of the target page, it should be noted in a dummy edit to the target page or on the target page's talk page prior to deleting. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 19:35, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Unneeded CNR, shouldn't be in mainspace. American Eagle (talk) 03:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Charlton-on-Otmoor

The result of the discussion was N/A as converted to article. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:24, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Charlton-on-Otmoor → Otmoor

I propose that this redirect be deleted as it prevents the creation of a separate article about Charlton-on-Otmoor village. Otmoor is a large area of open land with considerable historic and ecological interest, and its article should be developed with relevant content. Charlton-on-Otmoor is a village on one edge of that moor, the "Otmoor" article contains almost no content about the village, and it would be confusing to add any. Charlton is the largest of the "seven towns of Otmoor", most of the seven already have their own articles and Charlton is the only one that has a redirect to "Otmoor" instead. Charlton deserves its own article like any other English village. Motacilla (talk) 12:01, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can just start the article, the redirect was there to at least point readers in the right direction. There is nothing that prevents you or anyone from changing the text of the article (currently redirect ...) to "Charlton-on-Otmoor is a village...". The redirected is not protected or otherwise edit-proof. Fram (talk) 12:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wikipedia:HISTORIC

The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete, G7 by User:Jclemens Lenticel ^(talk) 14:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Wikipedia:HISTORICWikipedia:HISTORIC → Wikipedia:Notability (buildings, structures, and landmarks) I created this redirect to a proposal that has failed and currently there may not be a good secondary ___location for it. It is linked from a single afd at this time. ZabMilenko 08:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Bypass redirect and delete. Stifle (talk) 08:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)</[reply]
• G7 If you created the redirect, and are the only substantial editor of it, just tag it for speedy deletion in good faith. Tavix |  Talk  18:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Will do. Do I just delete this block to withdraw the RfD? ZabMilenko^{How am I driving?} 06:25, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Yumi, Eri, Ayumi

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:28, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Yumi, Eri, Ayumi → List of InuYasha characters

Same as the others; an unnecessary and confusing redirect. Very minor characters that are not mentioned in the list at all. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 04:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• This was the original ___location of Yuka, Eri, Ayumi (nominated below) and the pagemove history is NOT preserved in the page history of the target article. So, if the redirect below is deleted, then delete this as well; if the other is kept, then keep this too. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 19:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Yuka, Eri, Ayumi

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Yuka, Eri, Ayumi → List of InuYasha characters

Unnecessary redirect. Very minor characters that are not mentioned in the list at all. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 04:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: The page is tagged with {{R from merge}}, however no merge seems to have taken place (see all edits on 27 September 2008, when this page was redirected). Thus, it would seem that deletion would not cause a GFDL violation. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 19:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've removed the tag since it wasn't merged, just deleted via redirect per consensus on the list talk page. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks for clarifying. Delete to avoid confusion resulting from the absence of any mention of the character in the target article. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 15:54, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Yuka (InuYasha)

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Yuka (InuYasha) → List of InuYasha characters

Unnecessary redirect. Very minor character that isn't mentioned in the list, so redirect is just confusing. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 04:48, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The character is not mentioned in the target article, so the redirect could be confusing (and has caused confusion on at least one occasion; see Talk:Yuka (InuYasha)), and the redirect has no significant edit history worth preserving. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 19:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – A minor character would be fine, but it isn't mentioned in the list. American Eagle (talk) 03:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Money Honey (Fragments)-00:05

The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete, A1 by User:Edgar181. Lenticel ^(talk) 14:24, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Money Honey (Fragments)-00:05 → Elvis Presley (album)

Very unlikely search term. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I can think of only one person who would actually take the time to type that into a search box, and it's... Um... Nevermind, it's just a highly unlikely search term. [flaminglawyer] 02:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and Flaming. By the way, the article gives a figure of 8 seconds, not 5, for the track. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 19:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh dear, we'll have to create Money Honey (Fragments)-00:08 too. *gets right on it* [flaminglawyer] 03:10, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Wow, that is very unplausible. Unhelpful redirect. American Eagle (talk) 03:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.